Has anyone else seen this?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
shangrila
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:24 am

Has anyone else seen this?

Post by shangrila »

Hi all,
I have been running in to a problem with the latest patch, stock game. Wanted to know if anyone else has seen this.

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.
My opponent is seeing the same thing and it's giving him headaches.[:@]

Our current hypothesis is that it has something to do with TF's being disbanded and possibly information regarding that TF number not being cleared from the program. When a new TF gets that number, something happens and it starts leaking men back to it's base.

Thanks in advance!
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8272
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by jwilkerson »

There is one problem we know about that is addressed in the current up comming patch. Though the symtoms sound a bit different. In the problem we know about, you disband one TF in a port and others stop loading.
There is also a movement glitch that is being addressed with uncleared fields in the TF needing to be cleared.
But your problem does sound a bit different than either of these.
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
shangrila
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:24 am

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by shangrila »

yes it is different and have experienced those and work around them.
related to TF disband bug, possible, but not it's not just the symptoms of stopping other TFs from loading.

We have seen this since around December or January. And have restarted our game and reinstalled/repatched once in that time frame.Because it was such a headache for my Japanese opponent at the beginning of the war (Imagine loading your invasion forces, going every direction, to start seeing men magically back at port...and in some cases no men left on the ship given a week or two on board...no men lost mind you...just all beamed back to port.)
I have seen happen to me as the Allies as well. And we make sure the unit is fully loaded, leaving nothing back at port before we set sail.
Thanks
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: shangrila

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.
@#%! desserters...they should be shot. [;)]
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by saj42 »

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005
ORIGINAL: shangrila

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.
@#%! desserters...they should be shot. [;)]

consciencious objectors more like [:D]
At least they're not infected with a virus and defecting to the enemy like their leaders are prone to do [X(]
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by RevRick »

ORIGINAL: Tallyho!
ORIGINAL: niceguy2005
ORIGINAL: shangrila

Ships leave port full of men, or Air Groups...as the TF proceeds men bleed out back to their base over days.
@#%! desserters...they should be shot. [;)]

consciencious objectors more like [:D]
At least they're not infected with a virus and defecting to the enemy like their leaders are prone to do [X(]

Off topic, and probably in bad taste - but it occured to me. Would the US be accused of germ warfare if we gave that virus to Al Quaeda? Maybe we ought to just give it to their computers.
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
panda124c
Posts: 1517
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by panda124c »

Hey can we get the inverse of this bug installed where men teleport to ships at sea? [:-]
User avatar
Rafael Warsaw
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:45 am

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by Rafael Warsaw »

Shangrila:

Not every unit starts game with its structure in 100% ready and in place.
Only part of LBU arrive as a reinforcement on turn they supposed to arrive.
It usually takes some time for a LBU to be at full strenght with all detachments in place.

ie: You load Inf div wich just have arrive only to find that part of this unit is sitting in a port.
Its not a leakage from TF :) Just a new elements of this div have arrived.
Nothing happends fast in this game. everything takes time :)

get used to it.

OR all of this [font="Verdana"]talkings [/font] about THE dark side actually works.....

R.

IJArmy: 10% of Planning, 90% of Faith. BANZAI!
"A long and studied assessment of your situation, fabertong leads me to reach the unescapable conclusion that your fcuked mate. Hope this helps." by Raverdave.
histgamer
Posts: 1458
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:28 am

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by histgamer »

How do you know when a unit is fully completed building?
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by RevRick »

Check the TOE button... It shows what the unit is supposed to have - which is sometimes not doing it a favor..
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Has anyone else seen this?

Post by USSAmerica »

The part of this issue that I think a few folks have missed is that the troops already loaded on ships, at sea, slowly disappear from the ships...and seem to rejoin their parent unit back where they boarded.  I'm quite curious if anyone else has input on this issue.  I think I've seen it happen, but I wasn't sure what was going on.  Against the AI, I was evacuating some fragments from the PI to Darwin.  When they got to Darwin, the units unloaded from the ships, but the fragment units were not at Darwin, or anywhere else in Oz, the next turn.  I thought I might be seeing some type of attrition loss to the fragments, but I never checked the actual number of squads, etc while they were still aboard their transporting ships.
 
Ideas, anyone?
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”