Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Icedawg »

Do recon aircraft improve the effectiveness of naval bombardment and/or land unit attacks? It seems like they should, but I thought the manual said recon only improves attacks by aircraft.

Can anyone offer some input here?
Kapten Q
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:03 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Kapten Q »

Yes it does. Detecton levels have quite an impact on combat. Recon as much as you can.

Q
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Icedawg »

Thanks. This is going to greatly change my tactics. I had been using recon solely for locations that were going to be targets of airstrikes. Now I'll use them for everything else too.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Nikademus »

reconning the base doubles effectiveness*

* if using dedicated recon aircraft. You can recon with non recon planes but i don't believe they'll raise the DL (Detection Level) as high.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Icedawg »

Yeah, I read that in the manual, but for some reason, it stuck in my head that this was only for air strikes.

Its good to know now that recon also improves other attacks.

Thanks.
Xargun
Posts: 4447
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

Thanks. This is going to greatly change my tactics. I had been using recon solely for locations that were going to be targets of airstrikes. Now I'll use them for everything else too.

Also recon bases you will not be attacking so as not to give your targets away.

Xargun
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7205
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Feinder »

Using dedicated recon aircraft makes a HUGE difference.

Every wonder where those "nuke" bombardments come from...

Use -real- recon aircraft as often as you can.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
Knavey
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 4:25 am
Location: Valrico, Florida

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Knavey »

Yup, as allies, use all of the 10 squadrons that you get for the entire war.  They are a bit under represented in the game I might add.
x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"
Wolfie1
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Blackpool, England

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Wolfie1 »

ORIGINAL: Knavey

Yup, as allies, use all of the 10 squadrons that you get for the entire war. They are a bit under represented in the game I might add.

Does that include the Dutch Sqdn's that you get at the start?
Image


Teamwork is essential - it gives the enemy someone else to shoot at.....
Knavey
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 4:25 am
Location: Valrico, Florida

RE: Recon and Bombardment/Land Combat

Post by Knavey »

It probably does...being a bit sarcastic in the earlier remark, but it is not far from accurate.  I just checked the game itself and the Japanese get 29 units to start with 6 reinforcements.  Allies get 6 to start, with 14 reinforcements (most of which appear after 1943).  I am betting that there were a lot more allied recon sqadrons that 20 total during the war.
 
 
x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”