Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
landlubber
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Switzerland

Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by landlubber »

My present version of WitP is 1.804 and I got the following Combat Report which mentions that "Mogami" has been sunk. However, this report stays in contradiction with the "Intelligence Report" which notes that no Japanes ships were sent to the bottom of the sea.
Is this simply a bug of WitP or can this problem be fixed?

Image
Attachments
Clip0001a.jpg
Clip0001a.jpg (197.45 KiB) Viewed 233 times
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Is this a PBEM game or a game vs. the AI?
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
landlubber
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Switzerland

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by landlubber »

A game versus the AI.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by DuckofTindalos »

I assume you're not playing the Japanese? It's perfectly normal for enemy ships to take a while to show up in the Intel reports. Not a bug.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by saj42 »

Do you have Fog-of-War set to ON?

Does the air losses screen show the loss of the Jake and Dave floatplanes?
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
landlubber
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Switzerland

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by landlubber »

Yes, you are correct; I play agaiinst the Japaneses. However, does it make sense to hide the result for a while although the ship was sunk during the battle?
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by DuckofTindalos »

ORIGINAL: landlubber

Yes, you are correct; I play agaiinst the Japaneses. However, does it make sense to hide the result for a while although the ship was sunk during the battle?

That's what Fog of War means... Your RN sailors might not know anything other than the fact that they've sunk a Jap CA, much less the Mogami...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
landlubber
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Switzerland

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by landlubber »

Fog-of-war is set on and both aircraft are reported as "lost".
landlubber
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Switzerland

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by landlubber »

Yes indeed, your explanation makes sense. But the fact remains, one ship was sunk whether this was Mogami or any other vessel.
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: Erroneous reports in Version 1.804

Post by saj42 »

FOW might show some hits during a combat replay that didn't happen. Being a night action you might 'think' you sank a ship in the smoke and heat of battle.
More often a ship that sinks a day or so later might not be reported for up to 60 days.

The a/c losses screen is always correct so if you see floatplane losses you know for definate that a CA went down. This loophole spoils the FOW but is not a game-breaker.
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”