CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Andrew Brown »

Nikademus has kindly revised the "Nikmod" versions of CHS 2.08 to be compatible with Nikmod 9.1. This should prevent the problem seen with the earlier (8.0) scenarios in which aircraft could take too long to repair once damaged.

I have uploaded the scenarios to my WitP website, where they can be downloaded from the CHS Download web page.

A big thanks to Nikademus for providing these scenarios. If there are any problems with them, please let me and/or Nikademus know.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
rockmedic109
Posts: 2442
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by rockmedic109 »

I think I have found two errors in the database. F4U-1 DUR is 108. Ki-83 DUR is 88. I am assuming that these are double what they should be {at least F4U-1 would be close at 54 compared to the others}.

It looks like the Huge torp load on Shiratsuyu was fixed.

If anyone is playing the AI, they might want to drop the Fortifications at Hong Kong to 2 or 3. With the unmodded value of 4, the AI never takes Hong Kong....and that is with No Replacements set on Hong Kong LCUs. I started scen 157 with 0 Forts and it fell on Dec 8 {oops}. I am going to restart with 158b and set it for 2 and see how that works.

Thanks for the great work. I appreciate it, though I think my wife may be hiring Guido the Leg-Breaker.
rockmedic109
Posts: 2442
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by rockmedic109 »

Maybe another error.  P-36A has Device 161 Browning .50 MG.  Shouldn't it be Device 160 Nose mounted Broning .50 MG?
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

P-36A in NM never had it though technically I suppose it should since it does have a centerline. (Didn't bother for P-26 either since both planes exit so fast)

User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

I think I have found two errors in the database. F4U-1 DUR is 108. Ki-83 DUR is 88. I am assuming that these are double what they should be {at least F4U-1 would be close at 54 compared to the others}.

It looks like the Huge torp load on Shiratsuyu was fixed.

If anyone is playing the AI, they might want to drop the Fortifications at Hong Kong to 2 or 3. With the unmodded value of 4, the AI never takes Hong Kong....and that is with No Replacements set on Hong Kong LCUs. I started scen 157 with 0 Forts and it fell on Dec 8 {oops}. I am going to restart with 158b and set it for 2 and see how that works.

Thanks for the great work. I appreciate it, though I think my wife may be hiring Guido the Leg-Breaker.

F4U DUR should be 54, Ki-83 not in NM so i'll have to take a look.


rockmedic109
Posts: 2442
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by rockmedic109 »

DUR 88 would give the Ki-83 the same DUR as a B-29.  Doesn't seem right so I halved it to 44 based on the Corsair being doubled. 
 
And I can't recall ever having the P-36A in battle, so I guess it really doesn't matter too much about it's armament.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

most likely its an error though 44 seems low for a twin engine fighter in NM. Bomber and fighter DUR are modified seperately for 9.1
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

Corrections made and sent to Andrew for uploading:

1) F4U-1 DUR not corrected from 108 to 54

2) Ki-83 given proper 9.1 NM DUR calculation - 57 (was 88)

User avatar
Fletcher
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:26 pm
Location: Jerez, Spain, EU

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Fletcher »

Can I update this Nikmod variant in a game in progress ? (Refer :Scen 158 -Soviet Fleet+NikMod 8.0)
thanks in advance !
 
Image

WITP-AE, WITE
DD696
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 12:57 pm
Location: near Savannah, Ga

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by DD696 »

Don't we wish!!
USMC: 1970-1977. A United States Marine.
We don't take kindly to idjits.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

afraid not. [:(]
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Your mod sucks![:'(]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Your mod sucks![:'(]

I've heard CHS is quite popular actually.... [:'(]
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Darrrr... Maybe I was talking about your so-called Nok-Mod...[:'(]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

I'm detecting a hostile attitude on your part. Regardless....this thread is not about NM. It's about CHS, with NM A2A only added in.

[:)]
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Prove it! Show me at least three proper sources![:'(]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Nikademus »

prove what? that your the infamous SPAM KING....recently aprehended?

www.cnn.com

www.msnbc.com

www.foxnews.com
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15786
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Helpless »

Good news! Thanks Andrew and Nik! [&o]
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

Corrections made and sent to Andrew for uploading:

1) F4U-1 DUR not corrected from 108 to 54

2) Ki-83 given proper 9.1 NM DUR calculation - 57 (was 88)


The corrected scenarios are now available from my website.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
rockmedic109
Posts: 2442
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated

Post by rockmedic109 »

Thanks Nik.  I will change Ki-83 to 57. 
 
Good job to Andrew and Nik.  You don't get paid and still provide quicker support of you products than multi-million dollar companies whose job it is to provide support for their products.
 
 
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”