AGC/Amphib Force Question

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by dtravel »

I know some time back it was stated that an Amphibious Force onboard an AGC only needs to be in the same hex to reduce off-loading casualties. Has anyone confirmed this via testing? How certain are we that it doesn't have to be in the actual Task Force?

(Someday I'll be able to turn my brain off. But it obviously isn't today.)
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
rogueusmc
Posts: 4583
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:21 pm
Location: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Contact:

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by rogueusmc »

The Amphibious Force is supposed to stay on the AGC during the invasion...
There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

Image
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by dtravel »

Which doesn't answer my question.
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by saj42 »

If the AGC is in the same TF as your landing force - then it will unload as well - this is a bad thing.

Irrespective of the TF it is in, does the Amph Force HQ have to be prepped for the correct target for the bonus to count ???? or is it's presence in the hex enough ????
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by Nikademus »

appears to working. Also saw the adjustment to the AV level.
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by dtravel »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

appears to working.

I'm starting to have a flashback to trying to get an answer out of Frag. Working when? When in the same hex? Or when in the same TF?
Also saw the adjustment to the AV level.

Doesn't have anything to do with what I asked, but nice to know.
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: dtravel
Also saw the adjustment to the AV level.

Doesn't have anything to do with what I asked, but nice to know.

you missed the part about "Appears to be working"[period ending sentence] Also (as in "additionally") saw the adjustment to the AV level.

In other words, It helped reduce casualties on landing and adjusted the final AV when attacking. Take or discard as you see fit.

User avatar
tanksone
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:30 am
Location: St Paul, Mn.

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by tanksone »

ORIGINAL: Tallyho!

If the AGC is in the same TF as your landing force - then it will unload as well - this is a bad thing.

Irrespective of the TF it is in, does the Amph Force HQ have to be prepped for the correct target for the bonus to count ???? or is it's presence in the hex enough ????


Hi, I have mine in a well protected transport TF set to do not unload following the main amphibious TF(s). The Amph HQ is also prepped to 100 and while I've never tested it the out come sure seems to lesson casualties.





User avatar
stldiver
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:08 am
Location: West Palm Beach, USA

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by stldiver »

I have two AGC's in action (with HQ force), and have preformed 3 different landings. The first landing with over a division landed against opposition and the units suffered very little disruption and attacked well the day of the landing so it did work.

The other two landings, where not as significant as to the opposition so I could not tell if the AGC helped or not, again disruption was lower then a normal landing.

To work, I have the AGC set with a DD as escort, and do not unload. They are in the same hex, but seperated TF.
Showa rules!
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: dtravel

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

appears to working.

I'm starting to have a flashback to trying to get an answer out of Frag. Working when? When in the same hex? Or when in the same TF?
I believe it does if you take it with the above statement that it can't be in the same TF unless it also unloads with the invasion. There is no way that I know of to have some ships unload in a TF and some not.

I haven't run an isolated test, but in games with the AI, got far better results with the amphib HQ on an AGC in the hex, but in a seperate TF.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by dtravel »

I was not assuming that because one programmer wrote code to require the AmphibForce to be on an AGC to give the bonus, another programmer did not write code to require it to be in the same TF.
 
However, people have now indicated that they appear to have gotten the benefit from it just being in the same hex.  So the answer is "as far as anyone can tell", which is the best I expected.
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
KDonovan
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:52 am
Location: New Jersey

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by KDonovan »

from my experience it appears that AGC/Amphib Force HQ does lessen the amount of disruption...whether its in the same TF or not.

also if the AGC is in the same TF as the invasion forces...i've never seen it unload on an enemy beach....
Image
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by Nikademus »

you don't want the AGC in an invasion TF anyway because the game doesn't like unloading the HQ onto the target beach. I had a devil of a time getting it to unload after i took the base and it ended up splitting into two parts with the name suffix changing or corrupting.
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by saj42 »

A supplimentary question.

The force HQ has a larger load capacity than an AGC, yet it all fits in.
do players :
1. load HQ into a single AGC ? or
2. split across 2 AGCs (in same TF separate from assualt forces of course)
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by Nikademus »

one Amphib HQ is designed to load onto one AGC.
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by saj42 »

Thanks Nik.

now what do I do with all those spare AGCs [&:][:D]
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: AGC/Amphib Force Question

Post by Nikademus »

keep em handy for when plans go awry like what usually happens with me. (scratch one ACG)
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”