*** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
CJMello63
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Raynham, Massachusetts
Contact:

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by CJMello63 »

ORIGINAL: dexbox

i havent heard anything about it, what's it about??

Multi part mini series based on the PTO. Focusing on I think 4 marines and their various battles throughout the Pacific.

IMDB Link

http://www.beyondhollywood.com/hanks-and-spielbergs-pacific-mini-series-lands-its-three-leads/
dexbox
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:08 pm

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by dexbox »

that looks like it has alot of potential (sorry i didnt realize it was earlier in the thread, im terribly lazy, next time i'll check better haha)
Image
Image
User avatar
Arctic Blast
Posts: 1157
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:58 am
Contact:

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by Arctic Blast »

If it's got the same kind of production values associated with it as BoB did, it should be pretty good.
Meditation on inevitable death should be performed daily.
User avatar
Mad Cow
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 4:25 am
Contact:

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by Mad Cow »

wow, this is the first I've ever heard of this one! Thanks for the tip. [8|]

[:D]
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Arctic Blast
Posts: 1157
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:58 am
Contact:

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by Arctic Blast »

Well, finally got the BoB box set for my birthday. Watched the first 7 parts last night, leaving the last 3, and the special features disc, for this evening. Outstanding stuff. My favorite part is probably still Part 6 : Bastogne, which is the one that really focuses on Eugene Coe, the medic. I can't really put my finger on why I like that one so much, there's just something there that works for me, I guess.
Meditation on inevitable death should be performed daily.
User avatar
Bloodybucket28th
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:18 am

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by Bloodybucket28th »

ORIGINAL: Gil R.

...You know, this thread reminds me: a few weeks ago I was on another forum and saw some posts by people complaining that the story told was somewhat inaccurate, in that Ambrose pretty much highlighted the performance of one unit and thus minimized the roles played by other units in the same battles and theaters. Does anyone out there think there's something to this?

I think there is something to that. In general, certain units (the Airborne divisions, the Marine Corps, Third Army) get more film and ink spilled over them because of the perception that they are elite. To some extent, this is true, but you could make a strong case that the popular perception that the 101st "saved Bastogne" ignores the sacrifices made by the regular infantry divisions that faced the initial German assault against fantastic odds and performed magnificently before being overwhelmed. In BoB, the only picture that we get of this is of shell shocked, retreating GIs handing over ammo to our Airborne heroes.

Did that happen? Sure, but that's only part of the story. Part of it is the fact that the 101st did a great job while surrounded (a surrounded force is always a popular one in the media if they win out, and the "Nuts!" line is a classic sound bite), part of it is because the division in that sector, the 28th ID, was so badly demolished that most of the stories of heroics were witnessed by dead men and POWs, and the US Army was more comfortable praising "the cavalry that came in the nick of time and survived" than the division that was smashed buying that time because of bad Intel and poor army planning.

Read "Alamo in the Ardennes" for a pretty good picture of what the 28th did in front of Bastogne, and why so few people know about it.

BoB is an outstanding series, but anytime a particular unit or fighting man gets the media limelight, I think that taking care not to underestimate the contributions of others is in order.

In fact, I think that a major production about some non glamorous units like the 106th ID in the Bulge, the terrible waste of men in the Huertgen Forest that was perpetuated by inept leadership, the Marines paying such a high toll in blood for Tarawa when Betio island was used for squat afterwords, etc. would be a nice change from the usual focus on the upside of what the US armed forces did in WWII.


User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by ilovestrategy »

My wife was so sick of me watching it over and over and over on HBO on demand [:D]
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
JudgeDredd
Posts: 8362
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
Location: Scotland

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by JudgeDredd »

I really liked the medic one as well. Like you, I can't put my finger on it...but it was the very best out of the best series ever.
Alba gu' brath
User avatar
Plodder
Posts: 977
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 3:56 pm
Location: New Zealand

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by Plodder »

[align=left]I've always thought the next one in the series(the one that concentrates on Lipton) was the best one.
[/align][align=right] [/align]
Gen. Montgomery: "Your men don't salute much."
Gen. Freyberg: "Well, if you wave at them they'll usually wave back."
User avatar
JudgeDredd
Posts: 8362
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
Location: Scotland

RE: *** Band of Brothers - Revisited ***

Post by JudgeDredd »

See...there you go reminding me!! I like that one also...still prefer the medic one, but it goes to show how quality the program was!
Alba gu' brath
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”