B17@Midway

Carriers At War is Strategic Studies Group famed simulation of Fleet Carrier Air and Naval Operations in the Pacific from 1941 - 1945.

Moderators: Gregor_SSG, alexs

Post Reply
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

B17@Midway

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

The game has B-17D deployed to Midway.

It should be B17E

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

Image
Attachments
MidwayB17.jpg
MidwayB17.jpg (31.68 KiB) Viewed 217 times
Government is the opiate of the masses.
User avatar
blastpop
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:30 pm
Location: Connecticut

RE: B17@Midway

Post by blastpop »

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

The game has B-17D deployed to Midway.

It should be B17E

Maybe so, but they still won't hit a darn thing! [:@]
Mark
jazman
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Crush Depth

RE: B17@Midway

Post by jazman »

I was wondering about that.

There are some US marking anomalies, as well. Those B-17Ds have the early-war markings, and then the PBY Catalinas have the late-war Star-and-Bars. Hmm.
BS, MS, PhD, WitP:AE, WitE, WitW
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

[font="default sans serif,verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"] I really didn't pay much attention to the model number until I was examining some post mortem data, and discovered that the Japanese CAP was reported as having destroyed virtually all the Allied B-17, so I figured the victims must have been the "D" model (without tail guns, as depicted in the game's art). Even the earlier model was hard for Zeros to shoot down, BTW. The fighter's twin 20mm cannon had a low muzzle velocity and the shells dropped like rocks. They worked well enough in close, but their effectiveness declined precipitiously as the range opened, as was the attackers preferred stance when engaging anything with tailguns. Throw in the fact that the A6M2 only carried 60 rounds of cannon ammo, and you've got a truly anemic bomber-killer. I've often thought that the best thing to have done with a B-17 at Midway was to simply go bombless, load up with extra ammo, and then fly back and forth across the KB in formation, meting out futility to the approaching samurai/incendiaries. Would've made a heck of a show.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)
[/font]
Government is the opiate of the masses.
User avatar
blastpop
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:30 pm
Location: Connecticut

RE: B17@Midway

Post by blastpop »

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

[font="default sans serif,verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"] I really didn't pay much attention to the model number until I was examining some post mortem data, and discovered that the Japanese CAP was reported as having destroyed virtually all the Allied B-17, so I figured the victims must have been the "D" model (without tail guns, as depicted in the game's art). Even the earlier model was hard for Zeros to shoot down, BTW. The fighter's twin 20mm cannon had a low muzzle velocity and the shells dropped like rocks. They worked well enough in close, but their effectiveness declined precipitiously as the range opened, as was the attackers preferred stance when engaging anything with tailguns. Throw in the fact that the A6M2 only carried 60 rounds of cannon ammo, and you've got a truly anemic bomber-killer. I've often thought that the best thing to have done with a B-17 at Midway was to simply go bombless, load up with extra ammo, and then fly back and forth across the KB in formation, meting out futility to the approaching samurai/incendiaries. Would've made a heck of a show.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)
[/font]

Same thing happened to me to with my game of Midway. The B17's can't hit anything and make juicy targets as the scenario stands. Might be better to send them off against surface forces to increase survivability if such a force has been spotted and in range.
Mark
NimitsTexan
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:51 am
Location: United States

RE: B17@Midway

Post by NimitsTexan »

There should be a mix of B-17Ds and B-17Es (mostly Es) at Midway. But that is not the only error. The Wake Island Scenario has G4Ms, when in reality they should be G3Ms.
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

There was, indeed, a B-17D at Midway, belonging to the 349th Bomb Squadron. Records indicate the presence of sixteen B-17E.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)
Government is the opiate of the masses.
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

This is paining me mightily.

I went to try and edit the Midway scenario with an eye toward upgrading this bird, and found that the B17D is the only model included in the game.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

Oh, the horror...the horror.

Image
Attachments
nob17e.jpg
nob17e.jpg (4.73 KiB) Viewed 207 times
Government is the opiate of the masses.
Unhappy
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:38 pm

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Unhappy »

Here is a screen capture of a B-17E I made a resource file for. I'd post the .srf file if I could figure out how to do so. It doesn't look as good as the graphics included with the game but it is functional.



Image
Attachments
capB17E.jpg
capB17E.jpg (29.42 KiB) Viewed 206 times
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

Hey, the art's awesome, particularly when compared to my Colonel Kurtz. [&o]

Now just give it a tail-gun, power-turrets, self-sealing fuel tanks and the USAAF shall rule!

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

Edit: As was the case IRL, it doesn't really have to hit anything. Still, it'll scare the **** out of those little, gnat thingies.


Government is the opiate of the masses.
Kiwi Red One
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:47 pm

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Kiwi Red One »

Nice work Unhappy, looks very nice.

Any chance of sharing the steps you went through to create your B-17E file? Really appreciate it if you could [:)]

Cheers
KRO

ORIGINAL: Unhappy

Here is a screen capture of a B-17E I made a resource file for. I'd post the .srf file if I could figure out how to do so. It doesn't look as good as the graphics included with the game but it is functional.



Image
User avatar
Marcus Caelius
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:27 pm
Location: 44:57:19N, 73:16:18W
Contact:

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Marcus Caelius »

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

I went to try and edit the Midway scenario with an eye toward upgrading this bird, and found that the B17D is the only model included in the game.

IIRC from the original editor, you could add in your own aircraft. Come to think of it, I remember adding PT boats to the database in CAW.
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of anything is almost always the most boring one imaginable."
Unhappy
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:38 pm

RE: B17@Midway

Post by Unhappy »

I will post the steps I went through to create the resource file in the modding forum.
Post Reply

Return to “Carriers At War”