Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Miller »

I wonder how the Defiant would have performed if they had got rid of the turret and 2nd crewman and gave it wing guns? At least as good as the hurricane perhaps? was only 20 mph or so slower as designed.
Big B
Posts: 4638
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: Miller

I wonder how the Defiant would have performed if they had got rid of the turret and 2nd crewman and gave it wing guns? At least as good as the hurricane perhaps? was only 20 mph or so slower as designed.
You mean the version below [:)]
From what I have read - it wasn't quite up to the Hurricane..

http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/uk/bo ... efiant.htm


Image
Attachments
defiantbpa4.jpg
defiantbpa4.jpg (57.03 KiB) Viewed 183 times
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Reg »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Oh....I can think of one....

Bristol F-2B Brisfit

It was probably the success of this aircraft that inspired the concept of the turreted fighter in the first place.

Unfortunately the designers appeared to have overlooked the fact that the Bristol Fighter DID have a forward firing gun and it probably was a factor in its success. The weight of the turret most likely eliminated this option on the later aircraft!!
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Reg »

ORIGINAL: bbbf

The RAAF had quite a number of Battles as trainers - but never looked at as a combat plane.

It must have really sucked seeing they sent poor bastards up in Wirraways as fighters in desperation.

The use of EATS training aircraft in a combat role was problematic at best. A bunch of pilots and a few aircraft do not make an (effective) combat squadron. There are instances of combat squadrons working up very quickly (75 Squadron RAAF in 1942 being a good example) but these were usually the result of a conscious decision to do so and required a priority on resources. The key positions 75 Squadron were filled with combat veterans from the Middle East.

Another issue was the disruption to the EATS training itself. The training program was very ambitious and Australia was barely able to make the quotas as it was. Australia took its EATS obligations very seriously (sending aircrew overseas whilst Australia itself was under threat) and would not have diverted EATS resources except as an absolute last resort.

Additionally, as I said previously, the aircraft themselves were British assets and would not have been released except under extenuating circumstances.
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by m10bob »

Attachments
fair-battle.jpg
fair-battle.jpg (8.36 KiB) Viewed 183 times
Image

User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Reg »

Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6428
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by JeffroK »

I wonder how the Defiant would have performed if they had got rid of the turret and 2nd crewman and gave it wing guns? At least as good as the hurricane perhaps? was only 20 mph or so slower as designed.
If it had 4 engines it would make a great Lancaster.

I would rather see the engines and airframes (plus those wasted on the Battle) turned into the Hawker Henley and more Hurris & Spits.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6428
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by JeffroK »

Bristol F-2B Brisfit
Dick Doll's Bristol F.2B Brisfit The Bristol Fighter was the most successful two-seat fighter of World War I, and was buiIt to the extent of 4,470 aircraft between 1916 and 1926. It's included in the World's Smallest Air Museum collection because of that importance. Take care to understand the wing joining at the fuselage.
n 1917, the Bristol Fighter was a very misunderstood aeroplane. On 5 April, six Bristol two-seater fighters of No 48 Squadron took off on the aircraft's first operational mission. Only two returned. Near Douai the Bristol Fighters had been attacked by five Albatros DIlls, the aircraft they had been designed to fight against. But conventional two-seater tactics were hopelessly inadequate against the hard-hitting ...




After this, The RFC/RAF learned to fly them as fighters and they were very effective.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by ilovestrategy »

How the heck do you guys know all this stuff? I'm impressed!
[&o][&o][&o][&o][&o][&o]
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Reg »


A lot of reading my friend, a lot of reading...
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy

How the heck do you guys know all this stuff? I'm impressed!
[&o][&o][&o][&o][&o][&o]


Some READ history...some are old enough it is still a recent memory.[;)]
Image

User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by ilovestrategy »

I'm always reading history so I know a lot of what you guys are talking about but I still cannot compare. I'm always very careful about what I say in this forum. [:-]
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Reg »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Some READ history...some are old enough it is still a recent memory.[;)]

You remember Bristol Fighters??? Now I'M impressed!!! [:D] [:D]

But seriously, I know what you mean. I now have TWO serious history books on my bookshelf that I have personal recollections of the described events. The really scary bit is that they weren't even in the last chapter!! Crikey they were only 20 years ago....

By the way ilovestrategy, don't be afraid to contribute. We really aren't that bad a bunch (unless you catch m10bob around feeding time...[:'(]).
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Reg

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Some READ history...some are old enough it is still a recent memory.[;)]

You remember Bristol Fighters??? Now I'M impressed!!! [:D] [:D]

But seriously, I know what you mean. I now have TWO serious history books on my bookshelf that I have personal recollections of the described events. The really scary bit is that they weren't even in the last chapter!! Crikey they were only 20 years ago....

By the way ilovestrategy, don't be afraid to contribute. We really aren't that bad a bunch (unless you catch m10bob around feeding time...[:'(]).
[8D]
Image

User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by ilovestrategy »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

ORIGINAL: Reg

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Some READ history...some are old enough it is still a recent memory.[;)]

You remember Bristol Fighters??? Now I'M impressed!!! [:D] [:D]

But seriously, I know what you mean. I now have TWO serious history books on my bookshelf that I have personal recollections of the described events. The really scary bit is that they weren't even in the last chapter!! Crikey they were only 20 years ago....

By the way ilovestrategy, don't be afraid to contribute. We really aren't that bad a bunch (unless you catch m10bob around feeding time...[:'(]).
[8D]


After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by m10bob »

Not off topic...I strongly recommend the asquisition of Martin Caiden's old book, RAGGED, RUGGED WARRIORS....It can be had on Amazon.com for as little as 24 cents, IIRC..Long out of print, it is valuable as a primer and narrative of the early air war in China, Burma, Pacific theatres, involving tales by the folks who were there, as told to Caiden, somewhat of a writing legend of this genre,(historical/military aviation)..

This book is where ya' start, and from it, you can figure out where to go next.
Anybody without this book should just go back to eating banana pudding and leave the rest of us alone.[:D]

(My opinion here is far more credible than Nik's threat against that poor duck, which likely did nothing against NIk, though I can't be sure.)
Image

User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Hard Sarge »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Not off topic...I strongly recommend the asquisition of Martin Caiden's old book, RAGGED, RUGGED WARRIORS....It can be had on Amazon.com for as little as 24 cents, IIRC..Long out of print, it is valuable as a primer and narrative of the early air war in China, Burma, Pacific theatres, involving tales by the folks who were there, as told to Caiden, somewhat of a writing legend of this genre,(historical/military aviation)..

This book is where ya' start, and from it, you can figure out where to go next.
Anybody without this book should just go back to eating banana pudding and leave the rest of us alone.[:D]

(My opinion here is far more credible than Nik's threat against that poor duck, which likely did nothing against NIk, though I can't be sure.)

Great book, I remember reading it when I was in school, found it later and have it at work

(hmmm, been out of the Marines for almost 30 years now, so, that is a old book :)

Image
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Not off topic...I strongly recommend the asquisition of Martin Caiden's old book, RAGGED, RUGGED WARRIORS....It can be had on Amazon.com for as little as 24 cents, IIRC..Long out of print, it is valuable as a primer and narrative of the early air war in China, Burma, Pacific theatres, involving tales by the folks who were there, as told to Caiden, somewhat of a writing legend of this genre,(historical/military aviation)..

This book is where ya' start, and from it, you can figure out where to go next.
Anybody without this book should just go back to eating banana pudding and leave the rest of us alone.[:D]

(My opinion here is far more credible than Nik's threat against that poor duck, which likely did nothing against NIk, though I can't be sure.)

Great book, I remember reading it when I was in school, found it later and have it at work

(hmmm, been out of the Marines for almost 30 years now, so, that is a old book :)


Indeed, partner, an old book, that is why it was written while those pilots were still alive..
Not any of this recent revisionist crap being propogated on another thread???[;)]

If anybody wants to read the book without buying it, go here and it will list a library near you with the book:

http://worldcatlibraries.org/search?qt= ... mit=Search

(Yeah, you can thank me later).[8D]


Image

User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: m10bob
Anybody without this book should just go back to eating banana pudding and leave the rest of us alone.[:D]
[:D] I need to steal this as my new sig quote. I love it.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Fairey Battles and Boulton Paul Defiants

Post by Feinder »

Mmmmm.  Bananna puddin'...
 
-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”