Considering new game vs experienced allied player "closed"

[Freedom205]

I have a Nik Mod grand campaign 1st turn that I could have ready to play in about 1 day, and am considering starting a new game against a very good allied player. (or maybe buying Battlefront or CaW and learnign a new game if I get no takers) I have played witp since the beginning, (UV even before that) and while I an not the best out there, I will give the allied player enough headaches that he needs to be a dedicated witp masochist to weather the storm until late 42 or 43. I average 1 turn per day or more, but I will only play Nik Mod ( I doubt I will ever go through plotting a turn 1 for the IJN again!) and the allied player has to have played quite a bit so I know he will be around for the long haul. I hope I dont come off as arrogant, because I am not. I just am at a point where I can be very picky whom I chose to play.

Mike

[AdmNelson]

Mike, is a very good IJN and aggresive player, and he will give you headaches. I do recommend that he is someone you should play.

[Hortlund]

Well, I'd like to take you up on that offer Mike.

Shoot me an email at stevehortlund@hotmail.com

edit:
Forgot to add my credentials.
Played the game since 04. Played PBEM since 04. Played only allies for the first three years. Ive seen the pride of the Imperial navy sink before my eyes more times than I can remember. I've got 10-something PBEMs under my belt, 8 as allies, 2 as jap.

Im the guy who managed to defeat 2ndACR by reinforcing Java with 18th UK, one NZ and two aus brigades and all the artillery in India. He never took a single base, despite coming with 3 divisions and 2 brigades. Im also the guy who managed to do a chinese offensive to surround 10+ Japanese divisions.

Right now I only have one game going (against admnelson of all people) so I can do one more.