Thread Closed

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

Thread Closed

Post by witpqs »

I've noticed that all but one IJA curved gun rgt's are classified as artillery.
The one classified as infantry is:

IJA 2nd Curved Run Rgt



Also, all of the rapid fire gun bn's are classified as infantry. They look similar to anti-tank units that I have seen in the past on the Allied side that are classified as artillery. So:

Classified as infantry (possible errata):

IJA 1st Rpd Fire Gun Bn
IJA 2nd Rpd Fire Gun Bn
IJA 3rd Rpd Fire Gun Bn
IJA 4th Rpd Fire Gun Bn
IJA 5th Rpd Fire Gun Bn
IJA 6th Rpd Fire Gun Bn

el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHS 7.754 Errata

Post by el cid again »

The infantry classification is because they do not have sufficient firepower to provide any player options to attack if classified as artillery. This way the unit can participate in the attack. The weapons are such short range - and have no indirect fire capability - that for our purposes this is a better classification anyway.

2nd Curved Gun Regiment should be artillery - see eratta thread.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: RHS 7.754 Errata

Post by witpqs »

Okay - thanks.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: RHS 7.754 Errata

Post by witpqs »

Slot 1823 USN VB-5 (AP) should be named USN VB-3 (AP).
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHS 7.754 Errata

Post by el cid again »

See eratta thread. Yes it should.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

Closed in Favor of a Newer Thread

Post by witpqs »

Closed.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”