Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Adanac's Strategic level World War I grand campaign game designed by Frank Hunter

Moderator: SeanD

Phisto
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:30 am
Location: Poolesville, MD USA

Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by Phisto »

Another question on game mechanics: IIRC, the manual states that the rebasing command is useful for transferring naval assets from Wilhelmshaven to the Baltic ports without going through the North Sea (by presumably going through the Kaiser Wilhelm Canal), and thus avoiding entanglements with the RN. However, my attempts so far to rebase transports and/or warships have been thwarted by the RN. Have I misunderstood how the rebase command is implemented? Thanks for the insight and the great game.
User avatar
sol_invictus
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Kentucky

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by sol_invictus »

I have had the same problem. Whenever I have attempted to move my fleet to the Baltic, that damn Royal Navy is waiting to pounce. By using the canal, this should be risk free. Not sure if I too am doing something wrong or it is a bug, but the German Fleet always takes the long way around to the Baltic instead of the quick trip via the canal.
"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero
ojnab_bob
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:23 am

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by ojnab_bob »

I too have had this problem... can't seem to get any guys into the Baltic and/or Rostock without getting picked off by the RN.
SiTheSly
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by SiTheSly »

Add my vote for not being able to avoid the RN in the North Sea.
 
Although I have noticed that they do get through in the end just badly damaged. By 1916 the fleet is used completely repaired if you keep pumping in navy points and tick the fleet refit box.
 
Then when they do sail the RN is not as strong and you have a chance to gain superioty.
 
Its a high risk strategy but if you can pull it off the Britain is toast without its trading fleet since it only produces 1 point of food and imports the rest which I think equtes to 9 or 10% moral loss per turn.
 
Still doesn't compare with being able to use the canal though.
SMK-at-work
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: New Zealand

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by SMK-at-work »

It certainly was risk free in the beta....[&:]
Meum est propisitum in taberna mori
quikstrike
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:16 am

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by quikstrike »

Frank needs to add in restrictions for the Western Allies' navies, preventing them from entering the Baltic in a future patch. The RN never attempted a transit into the Baltic because of the hazards inherent in such a move. The Baltic should be a German lake--once the Russian Imperial Navy is beaten, of course. ;)
Jestre
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Rhode Island

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by Jestre »

I too have had my Imperial Navy mauled everytime I move from Wilhelmshaven to the Baltic.
User avatar
Bossy573
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by Bossy573 »

Same here. I thought I accidentally sent my ships into the North Sea.....
flintlock
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by flintlock »

I posted this in another thread earlier, but yeah, I haven't much luck either. Getting my fleet into the Baltic without being badly mauled by the British Grand Fleet seems par for the course.
User avatar
TheBlackhorse
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:44 pm

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by TheBlackhorse »

I always rebased (Usually in Aug 1914) from Wilhelmshaven to Rostock first and didn't have any British interference.
User avatar
sol_invictus
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Kentucky

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by sol_invictus »

I guess the British didn't send out the fleet in your case. I tried to rebase to Stettin last night and the jolly old RN was there to welcome me as I went through the North Sea. Since the German situation is unique, I am not sure if the program is failing to handle it as it should. Any ideas Frank?
"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero
User avatar
TheBlackhorse
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:44 pm

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by TheBlackhorse »

Not tue. The British Fleet is sitting there fat dumb and belligerent right off my coast.

Have you tried rebasing to Rostock vice Stettin?
User avatar
sol_invictus
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Kentucky

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by sol_invictus »

No, Stettin was my only attempt. I guess I will attempt every available Port and see what happens. Still, rebasing to Stettin should be no different than rebasing to Rostock, as far as British interception is concerned.
"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero
User avatar
TheBlackhorse
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:44 pm

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by TheBlackhorse »

Prrhaps since Rostock is the first port in the Baltic along the canal it sees it as being able to be reached via the canal. Choosing any other port results in an attempt by the High Seas Fleet to make a dash around the Jutland Peninsula?
User avatar
sol_invictus
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Kentucky

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by sol_invictus »

I tried Rostock and Danzig and the RN still intercepted me. At first, I thought since Rostock already had a fleet based there, that this is why you were able to Rebase the Wilhelmshaven fleet without incident, but that didn't help me.

On a related note, anyone know what happens when the enemy captures a port with a fleet based in it? I assume the fleet would automaticly Rebase to the nearest frinendly port.
"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero
User avatar
TheBlackhorse
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:44 pm

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by TheBlackhorse »

Did you rebase all ships at once, or did you rebase multiple times?
User avatar
sol_invictus
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Kentucky

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by sol_invictus »

I tried to Rebase them all at once.
"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero
flintlock
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by flintlock »

As the CP, this is the most powerful fleet I've managed to squeeze into the Baltic (Sep-Oct '14 time frame).

Image
SMK-at-work
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: New Zealand

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by SMK-at-work »

IIRC in the beta "risk free" rebasing only applied to Rostock - not Stettin or Danzig - if you wanted to go there for some reason you would have to do it on a subsequent turn.
Meum est propisitum in taberna mori
HMSWarspite
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: Naval Rebasing: Wilhemshaven to the Baltic

Post by HMSWarspite »

ORIGINAL: quikstrike

Frank needs to add in restrictions for the Western Allies' navies, preventing them from entering the Baltic in a future patch. The RN never attempted a transit into the Baltic because of the hazards inherent in such a move. The Baltic should be a German lake--once the Russian Imperial Navy is beaten, of course. ;)

I don't agree with this. The RN may have shied off from the risks of the Baltic, due to mines subs, and (mostly) the difficulty of supporting a fleet there with an intact HSF in Jade bay, but to ban it is wrong. The game should just reflect the difficulty of supporting it, and the high risk of losses. Moving into the Baltic was often talked about, so you cannot say it was inconceivable. If the HSF is defeated, (or more important, the light forces and subs are contained) putting a portion of the GF there is very logical and likely.
I have a cunning plan, My Lord
Post Reply

Return to “Guns of August 1914 - 1918”