Oil and Resources to Australia?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
velkro
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:32 pm

Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by velkro »

I tried to search the forum for this answer to no avail. As the Allied player, do I need to be concerned with shipping resources and oil to Australia? Or, are fuel and supplies enough? Thanks! Velkro
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by Terminus »

Yeah, that's a good idea, especially for Dutch oil and resources which then won't be available to the other side.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7681
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by wdolson »

You can get by without shipping oil, but it helps.  If Sydney and Melbourne have oil stocks, they will generate supplies and fuel with the heavy industry there.  That will not fullfill all the needs for the Southwest Pacific, but it will fill Australia's home needs with a little left over to ship to front line bases.  Auckland is similar.  It can generate enough supply to keep the North Island in good shape if it has oil.

While it's still safe to do so, suck as much oil out of the Dutch East Indies as you can.  I ship all the oil I can out of Palembang and the other, smaller DEI ports to Australia and India.  Most Allied locations have adequate resources, oil is usually the biggest problem.  If they have oil, they can generate supplies, which will reduce the strain on your shipping down the road.

The oil in the Western US will be needed to generate supply in the first year or so.  You can get away with shipping some out, but don't take too much.  At least this is the case with CHS.  I've never played stock in the big campaign, but I believe it isn't as critical in stock.  In CHS, things were done to keep the Allies from having overwhelming supply in the first year.  It's enough, but not massive over capacity.

The resource and oil part of the game is a lot less critical for the Allies.  If you don't ship the oil, you will have to ship more supplies, but it isn't a critical, stop production kind of problem.

Bill
WIS Development Team
Naskra
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:56 pm

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by Naskra »

You don't need to be overly concerned about it.  Australia has a net oil shortage and a net resource surplus,
so it behooves you to send oil there, since the oil transforms into both fuel and supply.  Most likely you will need to massively the augment the native production of supply and fuel if you are using Australia for anything more than R&R.
User avatar
velkro
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:32 pm

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by velkro »

Thanks all for the responses!
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by Gem35 »

I ship oil out of the DEI to Darwin and then on to either Sydney or Melborne.
Enough supp;y can be genrated to help keep Port Moresby operational.
But it is not a game breaker if you don't.
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9893
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by ny59giants »

If you're playing stock, then 1 large TK from the WC to Australia per month is sufficient. 
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
denisonh
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Upstate SC

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by denisonh »

I prefer Perth to Darwin, as it is more protected from Jap raids or Jap air raid if your opponent takes Amboina early. (Or takes Darwin, which really sucks)
ORIGINAL: Gem35

I ship oil out of the DEI to Darwin and then on to either Sydney or Melborne.
Enough supp;y can be genrated to help keep Port Moresby operational.
But it is not a game breaker if you don't.
"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC
User avatar
BrucePowers
Posts: 12090
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 6:13 pm

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by BrucePowers »

I try and ship as much oil from the US west coast to Sydney as I can. This works out, for me to between 1 and 2 tankers a month. This helps me generate supplies which can then be moved by all over that p[art of the map.

I also agree with Terminus. I try to move as much out of the DEI as I can. You may need ASW units to assist the transports due to the possibility of IJN subs.
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly thankful.

Lieutenant Bush - Captain Horatio Hornblower by C S Forester
rockmedic109
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by rockmedic109 »

ORIGINAL: denisonh

I prefer Perth to Darwin, as it is more protected from Jap raids or Jap air raid if your opponent takes Amboina early. (Or takes Darwin, which really sucks)
ORIGINAL: Gem35

I ship oil out of the DEI to Darwin and then on to either Sydney or Melborne.
Enough supp;y can be genrated to help keep Port Moresby operational.
But it is not a game breaker if you don't.

If the mission is to keep as much oil and resources from Japanese, then go with Darwin...shorter turn around times and you can get twice as much out.
User avatar
denisonh
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Upstate SC

RE: Oil and Resources to Australia?

Post by denisonh »

Exactly, but remember, if the Japs take Darwin, they get it all back. At least at Perth it is more protected.

Also, Betty's and Nells out of Amboina will make it more "expensive" to do this. In all but 1 PBEM as Allies, my Japanese opponent took Amboina early and made Darwin a tough place to mass Allied shipping from the get go. So if you get the oil there, lack of rail transport means it stays there and transhipping it to Perth, Melbourne and Sydney will be tough for the above mentioned reasons. And the oil won't help you until it gets to Melbourne/Sydney anyway, so make sure it gets there.

The shipping is more valuable than the oil IMO, so I don't uneccessarily risk shipping.
ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

ORIGINAL: denisonh

I prefer Perth to Darwin, as it is more protected from Jap raids or Jap air raid if your opponent takes Amboina early. (Or takes Darwin, which really sucks)
ORIGINAL: Gem35

I ship oil out of the DEI to Darwin and then on to either Sydney or Melborne.
Enough supp;y can be genrated to help keep Port Moresby operational.
But it is not a game breaker if you don't.

If the mission is to keep as much oil and resources from Japanese, then go with Darwin...shorter turn around times and you can get twice as much out.
"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”