MWiF Tutorial

[composer99]

Looks good.

[Froonp]

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
4th and last in the series. When we have the naval one polished, I'll post that too.

I've corrected the error in the text in this one ("white numbers" for the 14 Chinese Reserve Army).

[wosung]

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

Yes, there are that many different land unit types. And typically special code for each one of them for movement and combat.

Army Group and Army both as XXXX?
The former should be XXXXX, like Manstein.

Regards

[wosung]

Btw: really beautiful counters!

Regards

[Shannon V. OKeets]

ORIGINAL: wosung

Btw: really beautiful counters!

Regards

Thanks. They are exactly what are shown on the screen at highest zoom.

[Froonp]

ORIGINAL: wosung
Army Group and Army both as XXXX?
The former should be XXXXX, like Manstein.

I've corrected that error too. Thanks Wosung !

[brian brian]

I thought the Finnish MECH was actually elite? terribly minor point.

Excellent work, thank y'all as always!

[doctormm]

How does MWiF display the Sunderland flying boat sub hunter?

[Arron69]

maybe tell that the attacknumber in brackets is defensive only?

Besides that wosung is right really nice counters.

Edit: typos.

Andi.

[Shannon V. OKeets]

Comme c'est.

[Shannon V. OKeets]

ORIGINAL: Graf Zeppelin

maybe tell that the attacknumber in brackets is defensive only?

Besides that wosung is right really nice counters.

Edit: typos.

Andi.

That is done 2 units above.

[Shannon V. OKeets]

Here are some more Help pages by Patrice.

[Shannon V. OKeets]

Like those for the units, I will add these to the end of the tutorial on the map as summaries. They will also be part of the player's manual.

[Shannon V. OKeets]

These have some overlap with the tutorial on combat, but I think placing them altogether will make them easier to find when the player wants to reference them.

[Shannon V. OKeets]

4th and last in the series. I want to revise a lot of this text. There is plenty of room and the terseness of the English here makes it seem quite stilted - in some cases even grammatically incorrect.

[Jimm]

Looks salivatingly good.

Perhaps mention the antiair factor as well as AT for the motorised AA on the land unit display?

[doctormm]

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

Comme c'est.

<snip pic of Sunderland>

Can something about that be added to the help pages? If space is an issue, replace the Gabbiano, and use the Seiku as an example of a flying boat and primary/secondary designation.

[Plainian]

The C-54 could possibly be dropped from the chart. The Ohka has a Defensive Air Rating and the Me323 has Transport Ratings which can be used.

[Froonp]

ORIGINAL: Plain Ian

The C-54 could possibly be dropped from the chart. The Ohka has a Defensive Air Rating and the Me323 has Transport Ratings which can be used.

For the moment, I updated the bitmap by changing the text for the subhunter's factors. I'm loathe to add a third one to the bitmap, especially because there are only a couple of counters in the case of the Sunderland, and there are already 2 subhunters on the bitmap.

I added the mention of AA factor to the AA unit too.

[Peter Stauffenberg]

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

4th and last in the series. I want to revise a lot of this text. There is plenty of room and the terseness of the English here makes it seem quite stilted - in some cases even grammatically incorrect.

I wonder about point 9. The text says "Lake hexsides.....". But the only terrain using note #9 is all sea hex sides. So should the text be changed to "All sea hexsides....."?