Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Summary of results from Leo's ASW stock test:
4 squadrons on full range ASW at 1000 feet over 30 turns:
9xH8K - 0 hits
27xG4M1 - 0 hits
27xJake - 1 hit
27xHelen - 30+ hits
There appears to be a problem with torp armed planes using bombs against subs? I have run this test several times and the results are always similar to above.
4 squadrons on full range ASW at 1000 feet over 30 turns:
9xH8K - 0 hits
27xG4M1 - 0 hits
27xJake - 1 hit
27xHelen - 30+ hits
There appears to be a problem with torp armed planes using bombs against subs? I have run this test several times and the results are always similar to above.
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
No, all planes carry bombs when set to 'ASW' This setting also halves the range setting.ORIGINAL: matchwood
Summary of results from Leo's ASW stock test:
4 squadrons on full range ASW at 1000 feet over 30 turns:
9xH8K - 0 hits
27xG4M1 - 0 hits
27xJake - 1 hit
27xHelen - 30+ hits
There appears to be a problem with torp armed planes using bombs against subs? I have run this test several times and the results are always similar to above.

RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Ok...so you don't see any problem with these results then?
- niceguy2005
- Posts: 12522
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Super secret hidden base
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
How many subs were in the area? I assume they were stationary?ORIGINAL: matchwood
Summary of results from Leo's ASW stock test:
4 squadrons on full range ASW at 1000 feet over 30 turns:
9xH8K - 0 hits
27xG4M1 - 0 hits
27xJake - 1 hit
27xHelen - 30+ hits
There appears to be a problem with torp armed planes using bombs against subs? I have run this test several times and the results are always similar to above.

Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
I certainly do see a problem. Only the Jake's short range (3 hexes for ASW) can explain his poor performance (depending on how many subs had been within range). The Betty (ASW range 10) and Emily (ASW range 12) should hit at least as many subs as the Helen (ASW range 4). Both have torpedoes as 'primary' weapon, but apparently are not able to use their 'replacement' bombs against subs.ORIGINAL: matchwood
Ok...so you don't see any problem with these results then?
BTW, because of the decrease in range most players have stopped using the ASW setting altogether and spot subs using the naval search setting.

RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Not me. I use the heck out of my Helens for ASW. Once a sub is spotted, it is doomed to the face swarms of high experienced Helens and ASW groups built around my APD's.
The allies have any ship with a depth charge, I have my Helens.[:D]
The allies have any ship with a depth charge, I have my Helens.[:D]
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
All things equal: "We have a problem Houston"
- keeferon01
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:50 pm
- Location: North Carolina
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
I went out with a girl called Helen in my youth, fair maiden but she couldn't spot my sub for toffee , vast amounts of beer and boiled eggs cured that problem, fair winds.
ronnie
ronnie
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
There is a problem with Nells/betties, Emily, Kate etc. I have tried naval search and ASW but never achieved a hit with any torp armed plane in the 18 months of my current game. They launch attacks, but never hit. They also never hit shipping during the search phase.
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
1st thought, a squadron (27 Betties) searching a radius of 600miles is covering a lot of territory, its chance of finding a sub (without top rate ASW gear) is minimal, maybe it suppresses through forcing it to dive rather than combat it. Maybe fiddle with the height settings, a bit higher may be better? Does it carry fewer, larger bombs?
But the Jakes should be more effective?, but IMHO searching out to 240miles with 27 slow floatplanes isnt very efficient.
I dont know what range the Helen covers, does it carry more, smaller bombs?
I'm totally unsurprised that the 9 Emily's covering a radius of 720miles doesnt do much. (1,627,776sq miles or 180,864sq miles each)
But the Jakes should be more effective?, but IMHO searching out to 240miles with 27 slow floatplanes isnt very efficient.
I dont know what range the Helen covers, does it carry more, smaller bombs?
I'm totally unsurprised that the 9 Emily's covering a radius of 720miles doesnt do much. (1,627,776sq miles or 180,864sq miles each)
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
- Attachments
-
- ASWTest.jpg (106.9 KiB) Viewed 787 times
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Have just redone the test with the standard armament for Betty's and H8K set to bombs - results were comparable to the KI-49, possibly slightly less because of a lower manuver, but hits none the less.
Conclusion: ASW bomb equipping for planes with a primary armament of torps is faulty. Until it is fixed some players might want to change the default armament for the H8K?
Conclusion: ASW bomb equipping for planes with a primary armament of torps is faulty. Until it is fixed some players might want to change the default armament for the H8K?
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Hi all,
Nice test guys - thanks!
Leo "Apollo11"
Nice test guys - thanks!
Leo "Apollo11"

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!
A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
If you listen really carefully, you can hear some devs grinding their teeth... [;)]ORIGINAL: matchwood
Conclusion: ASW bomb equipping for planes with a primary armament of torps is faulty. Until it is fixed some players might want to change the default armament for the H8K?
Thanks for all those tests, matchwood.

- niceguy2005
- Posts: 12522
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Super secret hidden base
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Not to be a wet blanket, but well...is the issue here that the torp planes aren't hitting enough or that Helens are hitting too much. That looks like a lot of hits to me.

Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
36 subs + 30 days + 27 Helens = 30+ hits... Sounds about right to me.ORIGINAL: niceguy2005
Not to be a wet blanket, but well...is the issue here that the torp planes aren't hitting enough or that Helens are hitting too much. That looks like a lot of hits to me.
BTW, what was the experience level of these air groups, matchwood?

RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Average exp 75
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
I have scored hits with Bettys but Sallys and Helens are far more effective.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003
"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Great info. Just what I was looking for.
Thank you [&o]
Thank you [&o]
Nec recisa recedit
RE: Leo's ASW Test on 1.8.0.6
Hi all,
Again - thanks for not forgetting my (old - I did it in v1.4 I think - I am at work now) test and testing with latest version!
The more tests the more things we can, hopefully and possibly, report as not OK and let our valiant programmers fix!
Leo "Apollo11"
Again - thanks for not forgetting my (old - I did it in v1.4 I think - I am at work now) test and testing with latest version!
The more tests the more things we can, hopefully and possibly, report as not OK and let our valiant programmers fix!
Leo "Apollo11"

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!
A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE








