A balanced playable game should be

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: A balanced playable game should be

Post by TulliusDetritus »

Not necessarily "weird" or "curious". That's what "gentlemen" are supposed to do: you may disagree but you respect each other [;)] That's how it should work. Especially on the internet, where personal ad hominem attacks are so common.
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: A balanced playable game should be

Post by el cid again »

Well - I will certify Nemo is a gentleman - in the classical (but not English) sense of the word. Actually in the Irish sense. He is a professional and he has uniformy professional judgements about almost everything - if you can get his mind out of a game situation where he can stick it to the (hated?) English ???
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: A balanced playable game should be

Post by el cid again »

Another way to balance the game is to do something like RHSBBO. IF the American concept of focus on carrier air forces was in fact right, then NOT doing that should be a weaker hand - hence a more balanced game should occur.
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: A balanced playable game should be

Post by Nemo121 »

LOL! just saw that comment about the English.... Never hate a people but do feel free to hate their government for what it ordered its minions to do. That's a pretty good rule for remembering that people are pretty much the same the world over.
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: A balanced playable game should be

Post by el cid again »

Well - my own name is Cornish - and Cornwall was conquered in 917 ad. It was not a kind event - nor was the policy that followed - which among other things stamped out the language and religeon. I don't hate the English people either - but I don't like the policy of the Imperial regime - Imperialism with a capital I was an actual English political concept - perfected vs the Kelts in the British Isles before it was exported around the world. A lot of the problems of the modern world trace to its implementation - including the very creation of Iraq out of 3 ex Ottoman territories - in a form where minority Sunnies were put in place to lord it over everyone else - so they would need English support and arms - and would sell oil to get them! I profoundly wonder if we should still be honoring the policy of that era?
User avatar
okami
Posts: 404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: A balanced playable game should be

Post by okami »

Just my two cents but....."a balanced playable game should be..." Chess! This is WWII it was not balanced and for one side it was not "playable". I play the Japanese and you need to relax and learn the golden rule of WWII history, THE ALLIES WON. Otherwise play EEO when El CID is finished with it's developement. There is no balance in war. Life throws you curves, try not to strike out. As I said just my two cents.
"Square peg, round hole? No problem. Malet please.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”