Destroyer armor

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Rommel3
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:04 am

Destroyer armor

Post by Rommel3 »

(I'm poor at english sorry)

What is the reason to set destroyer armor value 0 ? I'v search forum but no result.
Odd thing is some DD (like Fletcher) have armor when the others have nothing)
Strange.
User avatar
AU Tiger_MatrixForum
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:03 am
Location: Deepest Dixie

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by AU Tiger_MatrixForum »

Destroyers were, and are, rarely armored. Their purpose in life was, and is, to go fast and shoot things, armor would have made them slower. Destroyers' defense was their speed and maneuverability, if you can't hit something, it doesn't need armor, theoretically.


P.S. Your English seems fine to me, and likely better than my command of your language.

"Never take counsel of your fears."

Tho. Jackson
Rommel3
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:04 am

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Rommel3 »

Is there no issue related to game engine?
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by DuckofTindalos »

What do you mean?
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Rommel3
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:04 am

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Rommel3 »

I'm not sure but I think i've read There is a reason for that long times ago.

By the way Small AA guns hits are very common close, night naval battle. There must be some difference between no armour and 10mm
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by DuckofTindalos »

In penetration, sure, but most destroyers just didn't have armour. That's historically accurate.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

Is there no issue related to game engine?


i think some folks experimented with putting minimal armor on all DDs to simulate the "armor value" of the mild steel (i.e. - non-armor steel) that the hull, superstructure, etc. Iirc, it proved to be a pain, and didn't add anything to the game... there might have been some adverse effects to repair time as well.

As the US industry got geared up to fight the war, they started incorporating armor-grade steel into even routine structural members on even small warships (like DDs). British observers, seeing this and thinking about how many lives it might have saved on their ships "just cried" (i believe the quote is accurate).
Rommel3
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:04 am

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Rommel3 »

Let's think about against 25mm Ty96 AA Gun or 1in AA gun. the effect value about 18~20, when 4.7in gun is 50, But High ROF of AA gun could cause trouble  to no armour Destroyer.

I hate sent DD's to repair rear base frequently
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by DuckofTindalos »

It's realistic. Too bad that you don't like it.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by FeurerKrieg »

The 99th Fighter Squadron which had already distinguished itself over North Africa, Sicily, and Anzio, was joined with three more black squadrons; the 100th , the 301st,and the 302nd to be designated as the 332nd Fighter Group. Flying from Italian bases they also destroyed enemy rail traffic, coast watching surveillance stations and hundreds of vehicles on air to ground strafing missions. Sixty-six of these pilots were killed in aircraft accidents or in aerial combat while another thirty-two were shot down and captured as prisoners of war. They destroyed or damaged over 409 German aircraft, (111 in the air) over 950 units of ground transportation, and Gwynn Pierson leading a flight of four P-47's sank a destroyer with machine gun fire, which was a distinctive achievement.
Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by DuckofTindalos »

This is also one of the reasons why the 75mm gun-carrying B-25 was less popular than the version with 10+ .50-cal machine guns. Both were effective at sinking ships, and the fifties were easier to hit with.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

It's realistic. Too bad that you don't like it.
T, it's a good thing you're not a diplomat...[:'(]

Rommel3, in my experience in the game, AA fire has little effect on warships. I don't know the reason, or the game engine mechanics, but it just doesn't seem to. That's not to say that it won't tear up a barge or PT boat. It might have something to do with the targets size. In other words, sure you can shoot through the destroyers armor, but you're not going to do much damage to the ship itself. As for the personnel, navy personnel aren't really modeled in the game. It's as if the ships are not crewed.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

Let's think about against 25mm Ty96 AA Gun or 1in AA gun. the effect value about 18~20, when 4.7in gun is 50, But High ROF of AA gun could cause trouble  to no armour Destroyer.

I hate sent DD's to repair rear base frequently

small caliber weapons often do little damage even when they "penetrate" the armor of a ship.
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Dili »

A 25mm Gun certainly will penetrate a destroyer with or without realistic armor at effective range.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Nikademus »

Give the DD more than 15mm of armor in the game and the device won't do anything except maybe cause a fire level or two if it hits enough. (at least if it's device#69 [;)])
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Reg »

ORIGINAL: Niceguy2005

Rommel3, in my experience in the game, AA fire has little effect on warships. I don't know the reason, or the game engine mechanics, but it just doesn't seem to. That's not to say that it won't tear up a barge or PT boat. It might have something to do with the targets size. In other words, sure you can shoot through the destroyers armor, but you're not going to do much damage to the ship itself. As for the personnel, navy personnel aren't really modeled in the game. It's as if the ships are not crewed.

Check out this link.. Surface combat using 20mm Oerlikons

It happened in UV but WITP is very similar.......
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

(I'm poor at english sorry)

What is the reason to set destroyer armor value 0 ? I'v search forum but no result.
Odd thing is some DD (like Fletcher) have armor when the others have nothing)
Strange.

WWII DDs lacked armour.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

Is there no issue related to game engine?


i think some folks experimented with putting minimal armor on all DDs to simulate the "armor value" of the mild steel (i.e. - non-armor steel) that the hull, superstructure, etc. Iirc, it proved to be a pain, and didn't add anything to the game... there might have been some adverse effects to repair time as well.

As the US industry got geared up to fight the war, they started incorporating armor-grade steel into even routine structural members on even small warships (like DDs). British observers, seeing this and thinking about how many lives it might have saved on their ships "just cried" (i believe the quote is accurate).

UK war-time construction was slap-dash. Good armour-quality steel was expensive and saved for where it was really needed.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Dili »

Give the DD more than 15mm of armor in the game and the device won't do anything except maybe cause a fire level or two if it hits enough.
 
A DD with 15mm of armor would be in bottom of ocean. :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Destroyer armor

Post by Nikademus »

huh?
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”