Actually I am calling BS on your claim that Sweden had concentration camps. Its a lie. Period.
Actually,
It's not. If you were not a pathological liar you would not ignore what is common knowledge. Nice try the with the
"I won't lower myself to the level of Ad Hom personal attacks like the racist, ignorant, warmongering American fascists" hypocrisy.[8|]
Doggie would not be able to fight his way out of a wet paper-bag, much less defend his own views. Have you actually been looking at his posts in this thread?
Looks to me like you're the guy who can't defend his own views, that's why you got nothing outside of
"you're a racist doo doo head". That's what you're left with when it's obvious to everyone you have no clue what you're blubbering about.
His views on world are,maybe,slightly better than hitler or stallin views. Fortunately his backward views are in minor in USA
Another "expert" on the United States from eastern Europe.[8|]
But ok, I was a squadleader in the Swedish army 1992-1993, and Ive been in the Swedish National guards from 2000 to now.
Bahahaha. A squadleader in an army that hasn't fired a shot in 600 years. You got a merit badge in "pissing in fijords"?
As for the British, we lost more to friendly fire from the Americans.
Because the stupid yanks killed any Iraqis before they could get close enough to shoot at any British troops. Hundreds of British troops who would be dead are alive today because of American airpower. Compare to the Falkland Islands, where there was no American airpower. Another college boy "military expert".[8|]
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin
And you do personally know what it's like? You're a combat veteran?
Unlike some people, I'm entitled to wear U.S. Army division patches from the First Infantry Division and the XVIII Airborne Corps. But you don't see posting an avatar pic of Audie Murphy and commenting on things I know absolutely nothing about.
Unlike some people, I actually was a member of the United States Army aviation company starting in 1972 and another combat aviation company of the NCARNG during 1991. I do not represent myself to be something I'm not, such as a United States Marine.
And like many other people here who are not European college boy "experts" on military history, I knew hundreds of people who actually were combat marines, sailors, and soldier in the Pacific during world war II, and to a man, every one of them despised the Japanese and not one of them regretting killing them in mass quantities. Most regret they did not kill more of them.
To claim that the gulf war was not combat is pure idiocy. Drop this moronic line of reasoning, cut your losses and move on.
To claim you know more about the Gulf War than people who actually participated is the absolute height of imbecilic arrogancance. Perhaps Mjk and Sarge should tell you what it's like to engage in homosexual orgies in a Swedish Army barracks? The difference between them and you is they don't make habit of designating themselves as experts on subjects they know nothing about. You, however, may feel free to enlighten us as to your distinguished service in a military organization that has not awarded a decoration for combat valor in centuries.
Like I said, I dont think a Tornado pilot would characterize GW1 as "non-combat
That pilot would be one of less than a dozen Tornado pilots that actually pickeled a bomb.
The overwhelming majority of combat air sorties were flown by American naval and airforce aircraft. And even their experiences were a day at the park compared to world war II. The United States armed forces lost more men in a single day on
Tarawa than all the coalition forces put together have lost in six years of combat in both Gulf wars and Afghanistan.
