ORIGINAL: jjdenver
I noticed that the allies have some HQ's with 1 cargo ship as a subformation: Egypt HQ, Malta HQ, French Africa HQ, Gibraltar HQ, etc.
So - what does having the cargoship do for them exactly? Does having a cargoship allow them to ship supply to subordinate units across water? Or does it let them transfer subformations to subordinate units across water?
It allows to transfer troops and it allows to send supply to ships in sea.
These cargoships are VERY important. Agressive players may also use them for surprising (and risky)
naval invasions.
ORIGINAL: jjdenver
Should the cargoship generally be left as part of that HQ or should it be detached as a separate unit to ferry units around? Any thoughts or advice would be helpful.
Both. That depends on the situation. When you want to do a amphibious invasion or evacuate troops you need cargo ship units.
When you want to transfer subformations over water you need them in the HQ. I often use these ships to feed my naval units
so i can keep them longer in sea and don´t have to send them to a port for resupplying.
ORIGINAL: jjdenver
Also - the Brit HQ in London has the Gibraltar HQ as a subordinate unit. The Brit HQ in London has 2 cargoships attached. If I detach the cargo ships as a separate unit and move the Brit HQ from London to Birmingham or Manchester - does this mean that no supply can flow to Gibraltar HQ from London HQ because London HQ has no cargoships attached to it?
Supply would still flow. The only disadvantage would be that you can´t send troops to Gibraltar. But why anybody should do that ?
Gibraltar is a arrival hex. BUT: I never let Gibraltar HQ attached to UK HQ since these route is too vulnerable to enemy subs. Better not too attach Gibraltar
to any other HQ and let arrive the supply directly in Gibraltar by action card.