So What is Better

New Recruits check in here! Vets debate the fine points! Tactics discussion, FAQ and "how-to" help.
If you are new to the SP:WaW community post an introduction please!

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

Post Reply
Gary Tatro
Posts: 1200
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 10:00 am
Location: MA, US

So What is Better

Post by Gary Tatro »

A Bazooka or a PanzerFaust?

Why?
"Are you going to do something or just stand there and bleed"
Kaakao
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Finland

Post by Kaakao »

I like the bazooka more. It has a longer range and you can use it against infantry as well.
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

Apples and Oranges.

Yes, the 'zooka is probably better considering it's versatility and ease of use.
Image
Got StuG?
User avatar
Orzel Bialy
Posts: 2569
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2002 5:39 am
Location: Wisconsin USA
Contact:

Hmmmmm?

Post by Orzel Bialy »

Now I have never looked up the armor penetration tables and compared these two weapons...however, from what I read and what I have experienced in SPWAW...I would say the following:
* If you are looking for a very versatile weapon for everyday use...give me the bazooka.
* However, if you are going up against heavy armor or bunkers...give me the PanzerFaust.

The PanzerFaust and it's cousin the PanzeSchreck had larger warheads than the bazooka ( the schreck had a 7 lb warhead and I believe 8.8cm diameter charge...don't hold me to that though. :) ) and could thus take out heavier protected targets.

As for SPWAW...do your own tests. Pick about four or five JSII's and put them up against infantry armed with each of the weapons...which I did one night when I was bored to death.
What I saw was the German weapons taking the Russian armor out with even frontal hits....albeit at shorter ranges....while the bazooka's bounce off more often.

Anyway, that's my 2 cents worth! ;)
Image
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

Good point, Orzel. :)

It's better to compare the Bazooka to the Panzerschreck - after all, the 'schreck was inspired by the 'zooka.

Those babies came in 88mm and 100mm.

There used to be an excellent site covering this hosted by..uck.. Geocities, so it's temporaily down since a few months back due to heavy traffic.

Some nice information in German can be found here .
Image
Got StuG?
User avatar
AbsntMndedProf
Posts: 1475
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by AbsntMndedProf »

Let's not forget the British PIAT! Even though, as I understand it, they were a pain in the butt to use, they can be very effective in SP:WaW.

Eric Maietta
Image
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

Well, that's true Professor.

BUT... apples and oranges again, IMO. 'schecks and 'zookas are RPGs, and takes very little effort to fire.

The PIAT is a spring-loaded abomination. :p It's like a giant grenade slingshot, or a grenade crossbow of sorts. From what I've seen, the jolly fellas issued PIATs were VERY strong.

Ahh what the.. just my $1/50 . You have a point nonetheless.
Image
Got StuG?
kevsharr
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Conyers, Georgia

Post by kevsharr »

Operationally the panzerfaust proved to be deadlier than the 'schreck or the bazooka because it was a one-man weapon,with it's simplistic aiming device and inherently short range a Hitler Youth or an aged Volksturmer could be taught to use it with minimal training,heck I've seen a newsreel showing a old woman in a dress and mink stoll firing one.The idea that a single nahkampfer huddled in a roadside ditch with two or three panzerfaust was a allied tanker's greatest fear in the last six month's of the war...To you a hero is somekind of weird sandwich...Oddball
User avatar
Major Destruction
Posts: 792
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Major Destruction »

Originally posted by Belisarius


The PIAT is a spring-loaded abomination. :p It's like a giant grenade slingshot, or a grenade crossbow of sorts. From what I've seen, the jolly fellas issued PIATs were VERY strong.
Not exactly. The worst aspect of the PIAT was that the rockets/bombs whatever you want to call them, were very sensitive and had to handled very carefully. But the PIAT was a favourite weapon carried in vehicles for the dismounted crews to use, if they could get their hands on one. The big bonus was that the PIAT could be fired from inside a building.
It was designed to recock itself after firing.
They struggled with a ferocity that was to be expected of brave men fighting with forlorn hope against an enemy who had the advantage of position......knowing that courage was the one thing that would save them.

Julius Caesar, 57 BC
User avatar
AbsntMndedProf
Posts: 1475
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by AbsntMndedProf »

Major Destruction posted:

"It [the PIAT] was designed to recock itself after firing"

This is assuming that the trooper using it had the strength to hold it steady when its spring mechanism was released. Given the jolt of the spring action, which from what I've read produced quite a kick. Very often the recock mechanism was made problematic by the jolt produced by the spring action. (Perhaps this is why they were issued to the strongest troopers available.)

Eric Maietta
Image
Post Reply

Return to “SP:WaW Training Center”