AE Map, Base, Economic Issues [OUTDATED]

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

Blathering continues ...

I see there are two new production symbols at Rangoon. Wonder what they are ... :)

Image

Sharp eyes indeed! The third symbol is "Refinery" and the fourth is "Light Industry".

Andrew

PS: None of us - well, certainly not me - claim to be professional artists...
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: dwbradley

Given the background of many members of the team I feel certain you are very attuned to leaving as much opportunity for modding as possible. My sense of where this project is now is that the really major changes have already been made (or are in progress) but that you might be able to put in minor changes if they had merit. So I would hope to propose stuff that wouldn’t require much more work for you right now but that might leave the door open for improvements later on.

Here’s one I hope isn’t too fantastical:

PWHEX/Map panel as an array. What I have in mind is that there would be multiple PWHEX and associated map files, with the current one being selected by date. So if there were a monthly change in the PWHEX/maps you would need an array of something like 60 of these. Considering the work required to produce even one set, the idea of producing 60 may seem ridiculous but the current Matrix team would only have to produce a single set and then replicate it to fill the array for the initial release.

If I understand the power of the PWHEX/map combination at all ( not certain for sure) then this would seem to leave open the possibility of changing individual elements in the array to account for seasonal changes, construction, etc.

To AB and all of the Matrix team, I say many, many thanks for all of your work. [&o]

Dave Bradley

We discussed something like this when we were considering "buildable" infrastructure, such as the Burma Railway, but unfortunately buildable infrastructure didn't make the cut.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Chad Harrison

All looks great AB!

Malaria questions:

I originally posted this in the land FAQ and Andy suggested I bug you about it.

The current system of malaria zones and morale degregation does not feel right. I like the system as far as disablements are concerned, but once a base in a Malaria zone has been completely built out and is sizeable, it makes no sense that base units there out of combat would have morale loss over time. For instance, take Port Moresby. In my PBEM game I still have the Australia Command troops that started the game there and some American base forces added in mid 1942 (its now mid 1943), and the base is all built out. All the troops there have very few disablements (makes sense) but their morale is all under 15.

That doesnt feel right. They are not in combat, so they would be 'in base' not out in the jungle. By the time that Port Moresby was all built out, I would imagine that it was a nice place to be 'in base' and would not harshly affect the troops morale stationed there.

What I suggest, is that once a base is big enough that morale loss should atleast stop. It doesnt have to gain, but it should atleast stop. I mean come on, if a base is big enough to store unlimited supplies without spoilage (combined port and airfield over 10), you can not tell me that the troops stationed there are in bad conditions that is affecting their morale more than say being on a primitive island in the middle of the Pacific.

Just some thoughts. Thank AB.

I will have a think about it. I don't know if it is something that can or will be changed, though.

Thanks,
Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: VSWG

BigJ62 mentioned a "replacement delay" for LCUs in the Land Thread. Can someone elaborate? Does it mean that some LCUs won't receive replacements for a while?

Sorry - you will have to ask the land team about that.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: pad152

Recon

There are several hexes on the map that can't be reconned! (example Bataan (allied), Japan can send a 100 flights only to get there are 34 units there).

Island/Base
You can send a ton of recon flights only to get there is 1 base force there, yet when you invade you find two divsions!


I don't know if there are map issues or something wrong with air recon.


I don't think that they are map issues. I am sure that there will be bug reporting threads for anything such as this.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown

I will have a think about it. I don't know if it is something that can or will be changed, though.

Thanks,
Andrew

Thank AB for the reply and the thought. Thats all we can really ask for [:)]
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: pad152

Production

1. Control - please put the player in control of aircraft production, so if the Japanese player wants to build older aircraft the computer won't over ride the players changes. (Either the player is in charge or the AI, not both). Maybe a toggle switch in the game options where the AI won't change production.

I am pretty sure aircraft production has not changed.
2. Aircraft Production Screen that shows all of the locations factory aircraft type and factory status (on/off) and required resources (supplies Heavy Industry, Oil, etc.). It's a real pain to find that factory you turned off!

3. Engine Production Screen that shows the name location factory engine type and factory status (on/off) and required resources

4. Balance Sheet - It's really hard to tell if you are plus or minus when is comes to oil, supply resources, etc. the game needs an account type balance sheet. I'm not sure the totals current in intel screen are correct once you start turning off factories.

As others have mentioned in other AE threads, changing or adding to the UI is far from trivial, and not very much has changed in that area. I don't think there have been any changes in the industry displays (I agree they could be better!).

Andrew





[/quote]
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: pad152

Ships production and respawn

Japan should always been able to build (MTB's (motor Torpedo boats/ PT boats) Midget Subs, MSWs, barges) if they still have production, these are the ship types that should respawn (60-80 MTB's, 60+ Midgets sub, 20-30 MSWs, 60-100 barges). Japan having only 4 or 5 MTB's is a joke!

Maybe MTBs/PT/s should be handled like Midgets!

Maybe a flag in the editor to tell which ship types should re-spawn.

Sorry. You will have to ask the Navy team about these things.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

New Question

Japanese aircraft engine production.

Is the bug where you don't see the pool going down likely to be fixed?

This is not something I was aware of. I guess we will have to have "bug reporting" threads, along with the ones we already have (and read).

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft
Great. So presumably Addu Atoll is now in the right place?

Is it in the wrong place on my old map?

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Captain Cruft »

Yes. You said so yourself! There wasn't enough room to put it far west enough, especially as column 0 is off-limits ...
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4971
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

Will the location of Abemama atoll be fixed? On the CHS map it is three hexes (~ 180 miles) south-southwest of Tarawa, but it should be located ~ 75 miles southeast of Tarawa. [/align]
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by pad152 »

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown

ORIGINAL: pad152

Production

1. Control - please put the player in control of aircraft production, so if the Japanese player wants to build older aircraft the computer won't over ride the players changes. (Either the player is in charge or the AI, not both). Maybe a toggle switch in the game options where the AI won't change production.

I am pretty sure aircraft production has not changed.
2. Aircraft Production Screen that shows all of the locations factory aircraft type and factory status (on/off) and required resources (supplies Heavy Industry, Oil, etc.). It's a real pain to find that factory you turned off!

3. Engine Production Screen that shows the name location factory engine type and factory status (on/off) and required resources

4. Balance Sheet - It's really hard to tell if you are plus or minus when is comes to oil, supply resources, etc. the game needs an account type balance sheet. I'm not sure the totals current in intel screen are correct once you start turning off factories.

As others have mentioned in other AE threads, changing or adding to the UI is far from trivial, and not very much has changed in that area. I don't think there have been any changes in the industry displays (I agree they could be better!).

Andrew





[/quote]

Andrew

Aircraft Production
You can't have it both ways either the player is in control of aircraft product or the AI, you can't have the AI over ride the player if you give the player control!

Production
Saying it could be better is like saying the tax code could be easier to understand![:D]
The main problem is if you start turning off factories the numbers don't add up. Go look at engine production if you turn off a engine factory the total numbers displayed being built doesn't change. I wish my checking account worked like this!

User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

Yes. You said so yourself! There wasn't enough room to put it far west enough, especially as column 0 is off-limits ...

Well, your memory is obviously better than mine!

Addu is in the right place now.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

Will the location of Abemama atoll be fixed? On the CHS map it is three hexes (~ 180 miles) south-southwest of Tarawa, but it should be located ~ 75 miles southeast of Tarawa. [/align]

Golly! So it is. How did I do that?

It looks to be in the right place now, but I will double check.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: pad152
Aircraft Production
You can't have it both ways either the player is in control of aircraft product or the AI, you can't have the AI over ride the player if you give the player control!

I understand, but coding is not my thing. I think this question would be better asked in the General Questions thread. I will try to ask too. But as I said I don't think any changes to aircraft production were in the scope of the project.
Production
Saying it could be better is like saying the tax code could be easier to understand![:D]
The main problem is if you start turning off factories the numbers don't add up. Go look at engine production if you turn off a engine factory the total numbers being built doesn't change. I wish my checking account worked like this!

OK. That sounds like a bug to me.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
tacfire
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:38 am

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by tacfire »

Hi there, I want you to know that I appreciate very much all the hard work you are putting into this new project.
 
Not sure if it is possible, but I had one idea for the new map:
 
Is it possible to change the size of the airfield and port icons on the map to reflect their capacity size? For example, something like one port icon for ports sized 1-2, slightly larger icon for sizes 3-4, larger for 5-8, and largest for size 9? - not sure where it is best to have the break points, but something like that anyways.  This would be very useful visiual information without cluttering up the map in my opinion.
 
I know you wrote that you can't have a dynamic map changes like the railroad bridge over river Kwai, etc.. but I noticed that in the current WiTP game the color of the port and airfield symbols get darker when there are more forces stationed inside them, so I wonder if we could also dynamically change the size of the icons to reflect the port/airfield sizes?
 
 
 
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: tacfire

Hi there, I want you to know that I appreciate very much all the hard work you are putting into this new project.

Not sure if it is possible, but I had one idea for the new map:

Is it possible to change the size of the airfield and port icons on the map to reflect their capacity size? For example, something like one port icon for ports sized 1-2, slightly larger icon for sizes 3-4, larger for 5-8, and largest for size 9? - not sure where it is best to have the break points, but something like that anyways. This would be very useful visiual information without cluttering up the map in my opinion.

I know you wrote that you can't have a dynamic map changes like the railroad bridge over river Kwai, etc.. but I noticed that in the current WiTP game the color of the port and airfield symbols get darker when there are more forces stationed inside them, so I wonder if we could also dynamically change the size of the icons to reflect the port/airfield sizes?



That is a very interesting idea. But unfortunately it isn't something that is being added.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16353
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown

ORIGINAL: Brady

Will "Fuel" still be available at some "oil" locatrions, those that could historicaly produce crude oil so pure it could be burned in ship's without refining?

Actually fuel is available at most of the oil locations, because the refineries tended to be co-located with the areas of oil production. If there refineries are all destroyed there won't be any fuel generated by the oil centres though.

Andrew

Is oil still necessary for heavy industry?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Knavey
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 4:25 am
Location: Valrico, Florida

RE: Admiral's Edition Map Thread

Post by Knavey »

Placekeeping post for when I come back to read some more.
x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”