Admirals Edition Naval Thread

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Dili »

Sorry, I didn't see the other question. That's an Air Team issue, so please ask over there.
 
I will thanks.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12843
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Sardaukar »

Any chance to get "auto-disband" command switch for subs too ? Kinda weird that any other TF can auto-disband when back in home port but not sub TF.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
wworld7
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:57 am
Location: The Nutmeg State

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by wworld7 »

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Any chance to get "auto-disband" command switch for subs too ? Kinda weird that any other TF can auto-disband when back in home port but not sub TF.

I'll second this request. I hate having to disband subs, as I sometimes miss checking all ports. Which wastes repair time.

Flipper
User avatar
MineSweeper
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:03 pm
Location: Nags Head, NC

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by MineSweeper »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen


True for most of the war. They were involved in transporting the AIF from Australia to North Africa circa 1940. One (or maybe both) of them was refitted in Sydney between start-of-war-in-Europe and start-of-war-in-Pacific. But by or soon after the US got into the war, they were moved to the cross Atlantic routes.

Always the possibility that they could be used in the Pacific again after the war ended in Europe.

I'm sure someone on the forum has a complete day by day tract of them, along with Aquitania and Nieuw Amsterdam.

Well...




You ask and you shall recieve....[;)] Timeline in the PTO
We got to get the 2nd largest ship (81,000 tons) in the world into AE...[;)]
SS Normandie was the largest at (83,423 tons)

RMS Queen Mary

11/30/41 - 12/18/41 Docked at Trincomlee, Ceylon
12/19/41 - 12/28/41 On Route to Capetown, SA

3/15/42 - 3/23/42 On Route to Freemantle, AUS
3/24/42 - 3/28/42 On Route to Sydney, AUS
3/29/42 - 4/5/42 Docked Sydney, AUS
4/6/42 - 4/21/42 On Route to Capetown, SA

2/9/43 - Docked Maldives
2/10/43 - 2/18/43 On Route to Freemantle, AUS
2/19/43 - Docked Freemantle, AUS
2/20/43 - 2/27/43 On Route to Sydney, AUS
2/28/43 - 3/21/43 Docked at Sydney, AUS
2/22/43 - 4/18/43 On Route to Capetown, AUS

Image


mikemike
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:26 pm
Location: a maze of twisty little passages, all different

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by mikemike »

Does AE have building cost and durability of ships as separate data fields? This would help with "transferred" ships like Ro 500 (=U511), the Type IXC sub transferred to Japan. The boat arrived in Japan in August, 1943. There should be a way to have the boat arrive at the correct time in the game without having the Japanese player pay shipbuilding points for it.
DON´T PANIC - IT´S ALL JUST ONES AND ZEROES!
Richrd
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 6:14 am

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Richrd »

I think I'm reading that you will be able to run ASW patrols with naval units like aircraft can now. Maybe persistent minesweeping patrols too?
Richrd
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: DerJimbo

Will you be able to organize your combat vessels in subunits such as "1st Cruiser Sqn" or "3rd Destroyer Flotilla"?

Yes, that would be very nice. Those of us crazies who actually manage our fleets this way could do it in the game. Also, it would make creating TFs much easier in ports with large numbers of ships.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: DerJimbo

Will you be able to organize your combat vessels in subunits such as "1st Cruiser Sqn" or "3rd Destroyer Flotilla"?

Yes, and No.

You can set lower level commands, although more likely something like Naval Districts within regional fleets, etc. This is just a display convenience however, there is no function for attach a complete DD squadron to a TF or any such thing. It is handy for "where's my ships"?

P.S. I looked into doing it already, don't bother to ask for it...



Darn.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Now you know i'm gonna like that with my pedigree[:)]

Pffft!
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish

I thought the Queens for most of WWII ferried stuff between England and the U.S. because they were so fast.

I could be wrong.

True for most of the war. They were involved in transporting the AIF from Australia to North Africa circa 1940. One (or maybe both) of them was refitted in Sydney between start-of-war-in-Europe and start-of-war-in-Pacific. But by or soon after the US got into the war, they were moved to the cross Atlantic routes.

Always the possibility that they could be used in the Pacific again after the war ended in Europe.

I'm sure someone on the forum has a complete day by day tract of them, along with Aquitania and Nieuw Amsterdam.

Well...



I know that when the Bismarck was running amok, they were transiting the Atlantic unescorted (due to their speed). There was concern that the Bismarck could catch one of them and sink her.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
bradfordkay
Posts: 8686
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by bradfordkay »

ORIGINAL: Brady

Sloop, behind the DUKW:

Image


That's not a sloop, Brady, it's a schooner. CHS has them included. I'm not part of the AE crew, so I have no idea aas to whether they'll be in it...
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

We discussed that a lot, and the short and the long of it is, don't expect any big "never-weres", like lots of Taiho's and what-not. We're going to stay within realistic Japanese (and Allied) planning. With that said, we've got a huge new OOB, and some new tricks planned, courtesy of the very cool Convert-To routines.

T, what about all the Japanese ships that were planned but never constructed?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mobeer
Posts: 668
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:59 pm

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mobeer »

1) Will the Japanese player be able to convert Nisshin or Mizunho to light carriers?
1a) Will the AI be able to do this?
2) Will historically sunk ships have further upgrades available in later years?
3) Will the re-incarnation of Allied cruisers continue? Will there be a limit to how many cruisers can be recreated?
4) If US carriers are not sunk, will the replacements enter service under alternative names?
5) Will replacement US carriers have airgroups?
6) Will the AI understand the difference between normal and replacement carrier air groups on US escort carriers?
User avatar
Bulldog61
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Aurora,CO

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Bulldog61 »

actually MRE stands for Meals refusing to exit!
ORIGINAL: Terminus

I'm not sure you can build Meals Ready to Eat today?[:'(]
You can run but you'll die tired!
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Nomad »

And I thought MRE stood for Meals Rushing to Exit. [:D]
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Brady »

Sloop=one mast?
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
bradfordkay
Posts: 8686
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by bradfordkay »

Yep.
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12843
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Sardaukar »

Another pet peeve of mine:

Will CS Convoys be able to load Oil automatically ? In WitP one has to use manual convoys. Waypoints and CS Convoy able to auto-load Oil would lessen especially Japanese micromanagement. Ditto when I want to ship oil from USA to Oz.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
rockmedic109
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by rockmedic109 »

ORIGINAL: MikeKraemer

actually MRE stands for Meals refusing to exit!
ORIGINAL: Terminus

I'm not sure you can build Meals Ready to Eat today?[:'(]

I thought "Meal, Ready to Eat" was three lies for the price of one.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12843
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Sardaukar »

Yep...and "Meals Rejected by Ethiopians"

Also, AFAIK, pack of 4 frankfurter sausages in one MRE variation are called "Four Fingers of Death" [:D][:D]

I have, out of curiosity, sampled few MREs, and can say that while some of it is edible, some is quite dire shite... I prefer my Finnish army rations.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”