Game speedup suggestion

Post bug reports and ask for support here.

Moderator: MOD_EIA

Post Reply
gwheelock
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Coon Rapids, Minnesota

Game speedup suggestion

Post by gwheelock »

If a player has NO naval corp on map; skip their naval turn.
(Prussia has no naval corp; no corp = no navy; no navy = no need for naval movement/combat)

(As France; I also intent to apply this concept to the British [:'(] )


The same principle could also apply to land; except that it would
have to be no corp AND no besieged garrisons (that could [theoretically] "attack-out")
(possible for some countries at the start of enforced peace terms - either all troops in
garrison to save $ on corp maintenance or Prussia saving both $ AND MP)
Guy
User avatar
DCWhitworth
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:20 am
Location: Norwich, England

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by DCWhitworth »

I don't think I've ever seen a nation have no corps on the board. Mostly because you can't put guard and cavalry into garrisons. But even if you *did* have that situation they'd have had to have purchased no corps counters in the previous reinforcement phase which is unlikely. The naval phase idea makes sense though.

How about in a PBEM game having a way of indicating at the end of your phase that you wish to skip one or more forthcoming phases ? I can forsee plenty of situations where a player would have no reason to play a diplomatic or especially a reinforcement phase.
Regards
David
User avatar
Jimmer
Posts: 1968
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:50 pm

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by Jimmer »

ORIGINAL: gwheelock

(As France; I also intent to apply this concept to the British [:'(] )
Sure, sure. I understand your desires. But, can't it wait until after tea time?
At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?
AndrewV
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:12 am

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by AndrewV »

As France; I also intent to apply this concept to the British)
As Prussia I have applied this concept to the French and British.
User avatar
DCWhitworth
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:20 am
Location: Norwich, England

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by DCWhitworth »

ORIGINAL: AndrewV
As France; I also intent to apply this concept to the British)
As Prussia I have applied this concept to the French and British.

No you just think you have, because as Prussia you wouldn't recognise a ship if you saw one [:'(]
Regards
David
gwheelock
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Coon Rapids, Minnesota

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by gwheelock »

ORIGINAL: DCWhitworth

I don't think I've ever seen a nation have no corps on the board. Mostly because you can't put guard and cavalry into garrisons. But even if you *did* have that situation they'd have had to have purchased no corps counters in the previous reinforcement phase which is unlikely. The naval phase idea makes sense though.

How about in a PBEM game having a way of indicating at the end of your phase that you wish to skip one or more forthcoming phases ? I can forsee plenty of situations where a player would have no reason to play a diplomatic or especially a reinforcement phase.

Then you never saw ME (as Austria) right after a rather THOROUGH mauling by France in one of the boardgames that I played. ALL of the guard & cav were dead. Since I
had surrendered & had 18 months before the next bout; I didnt need to build anything
except Infentry for about 9 months & thus had NO corp on map for about 14 months
(9 all I + 5 before the cav actually started showing up). This was a significant chunk of change.

Oh and PURCHASED (but not placed) counters don't count because you can't place them
until REINFORCEMENT & I'm talking about skipping MOVEMENT (& combat) steps
Guy
User avatar
DCWhitworth
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:20 am
Location: Norwich, England

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by DCWhitworth »

ORIGINAL: gwheelock

Then you never saw ME (as Austria) right after a rather THOROUGH mauling by France in one of the boardgames that I played. ALL of the guard & cav were dead. Since I
had surrendered & had 18 months before the next bout; I didnt need to build anything
except Infentry for about 9 months & thus had NO corp on map for about 14 months
(9 all I + 5 before the cav actually started showing up). This was a significant chunk of change.

Oh and PURCHASED (but not placed) counters don't count because you can't place them
until REINFORCEMENT & I'm talking about skipping MOVEMENT (& combat) steps

Fair point about the counters. I wasn't thinking straight.

I agree that the situation of not having counters on the board *can* happen, I just think it is sufficiently rare not to be worth bothering with a program change.
Regards
David
gwheelock
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Coon Rapids, Minnesota

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by gwheelock »

I agree that the land phase is probably not worth spending a lot of programming time on
(my case was a rather rare one); but the Naval condition is GUARENTEED to occur for
Prussia for at LEAST a year (& possibly the entire game).
Guy
Grognot
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:37 pm

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by Grognot »

Prussia can have fleets to control in January, 1805.  It's not particularly likely, but it's possible.
--
Not a grognard.
Not an optimizer. It's a game to me, not a job.
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Game speedup suggestion

Post by MarshallEllis »

Skipping the naval phase for Prussia might be a good idea.
Skipping the reinf phase if nothing is available is a NO-NO. I know this from experience. This was one of the first things that the testers tagged me for a while back!
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”