Jack or George

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
ExarKun
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: Poland (EU)

Jack or George

Post by ExarKun »

I've simple question - which figher is better in A2A missions? Jack or N1K1? My PBEM campagn is already in mid '43 so both types are avaible (Jacks are manufactured for last few months). I've been looking for stats however I can't see many differences. In fact I think older Jack is slightly better. Is it right? I'm playing CHS mod if it's important.
User avatar
okami
Posts: 404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: Jack or George

Post by okami »

ORIGINAL: ExarKun

I've simple question - which figher is better in A2A missions? Jack or N1K1? My PBEM campagn is already in mid '43 so both types are avaible (Jacks are manufactured for last few months). I've been looking for stats however I can't see many differences. In fact I think older Jack is slightly better. Is it right? I'm playing CHS mod if it's important.
If you can now produce N1K1 and your economy is strong, then convert the Jacks to N1K1s as the N1k1s have greater range. Also the N1k1 upgrades to the N1K2 which is even better. Remember to leave 48 J2M2s in your pool for new squadrons that will come on line.
"Square peg, round hole? No problem. Malet please.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Jack or George

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: okami

ORIGINAL: ExarKun

I've simple question - which figher is better in A2A missions? Jack or N1K1? My PBEM campagn is already in mid '43 so both types are avaible (Jacks are manufactured for last few months). I've been looking for stats however I can't see many differences. In fact I think older Jack is slightly better. Is it right? I'm playing CHS mod if it's important.
If you can now produce N1K1 and your economy is strong, then convert the Jacks to N1K1s as the N1k1s have greater range. Also the N1k1 upgrades to the N1K2 which is even better. Remember to leave 48 J2M2s in your pool for new squadrons that will come on line.


the Jack has a range of 6 and the George 4...
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Jack or George

Post by pompack »

George is a better point-defense interceptor but Jack is better for escort (longer range)

EDIT: in stock games
ExarKun
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: Poland (EU)

RE: Jack or George

Post by ExarKun »

In CHS Jack has range of 4. George - don't know exacly but in stats has 360 miles so 6 hexes.
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Jack or George

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: okami

Remember to leave 48 J2M2s in your pool for new squadrons that will come on line.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the last patch (1.806) for WITP made it such that new arriving reinforcements for Japanese, if there are not enough planes, will no longer sit in the queue indefinitely until enough planes arrive. Instead they will either flesh out with a downgrade or upgrade OR will take whatever number of the correct plane is available and simply show up understrength. I could be wrong. [&:]
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Jack or George

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: ExarKun

In CHS Jack has range of 4. George - don't know exacly but in stats has 360 miles so 6 hexes.


sorry, I was thinking of stock, didn´t read carefully enough you´re playing CHS
User avatar
okami
Posts: 404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: Jack or George

Post by okami »

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress

ORIGINAL: okami

Remember to leave 48 J2M2s in your pool for new squadrons that will come on line.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the last patch (1.806) for WITP made it such that new arriving reinforcements for Japanese, if there are not enough planes, will no longer sit in the queue indefinitely until enough planes arrive. Instead they will either flesh out with a downgrade or upgrade OR will take whatever number of the correct plane is available and simply show up understrength. I could be wrong. [&:]
No Gary you are quite correct. The reason to have a full complement is so you do not lose any pilots. This is very important as CHS and Stock are absurdly low on Japanese pilots.
"Square peg, round hole? No problem. Malet please.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”