Admiral's Edition General Thread

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by witpqs »

I guess I should have asked "What does SPS stand for?"

I get the PS = Potential Size, but what is the first 'S'?
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by treespider »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I guess I should have asked "What does SPS stand for?"

I get the PS = Potential Size, but what is the first 'S'?


I think the manual said "Standard"... but I don't have it with me at the moment.
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by witpqs »

Thanks - I didn't realize I was asking something from the manual (don't want to waste your time with that). I thought is was something only available with your secret decoder ring! [:D]
Bahnsteig
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Croatia\Germany

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Bahnsteig »

Will there be any changes to prevent different nations to fight in different countries?
Something like the Chinese fighting in Burma, the English fighting in China, or the mixed allied airfleet stationed `42 in China and bombing everything in range?
Bombing occupied resources and oil by the allies should cost PP, no nation would be happy to see their colonies get bombed to dust just because Japan holds them for a while.
Did the allies bomb Dutch recources in the war?

 
bradfordkay
Posts: 8602
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by bradfordkay »

" Did the allies bomb Dutch recources in the war? "

Yes. Even the Dutch bombed the refineries at Palembang from Batavia after the Japanese captured them.

They probably thought of it this way: we can always rebuild the oil facilities, but we can't get back whatever oil the Japanese steal...
fair winds,
Brad
Bahnsteig
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Croatia\Germany

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Bahnsteig »

Yes. Even the Dutch bombed the refineries at Palembang from Batavia after the Japanese captured them.

Good to know, couldn't find anything about that in the internet.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Raverdave »

The allies were always quick to prevent the Axis from gaining from captured areas and equipment.  Remember what the Royal Navy did to the French fleet in 1940?
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Raverdave »

IIRC the RAAF bombed Palembang (B-24's) as well as oil fields in Borneo.
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Terminus »

More than a few RN air strikes were also launched against the Sumatra oil fields.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by spence »

More than a few RN air strikes were also launched against the Borneo oil fields.

Along with some USAAF B-24 strikes on Balikpapan from northern OZ (don't think it's possible in the game due to range though I think the Allies can hit Soerabaya's oil from OZ).

And USN Patrol Bomber Squadrons hit the Borneo oil field from bases in the PI late in the war.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: spence
More than a few RN air strikes were also launched against the Borneo oil fields.

Along with some USAAF B-24 strikes on Balikpapan from northern OZ (don't think it's possible in the game due to range though I think the Allies can hit Soerabaya's oil from OZ).

And USN Patrol Bomber Squadrons hit the Borneo oil field from bases in the PI late in the war.


Soerabaja is too far to reach it with 4Es from Northern Australia. Kendari, Amboina and Sorong are in range though...
User avatar
VSWG
Posts: 3217
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by VSWG »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

" Did the allies bomb Dutch recources in the war? "

Yes. Even the Dutch bombed the refineries at Palembang from Batavia after the Japanese captured them.

They probably thought of it this way: we can always rebuild the oil facilities, but we can't get back whatever oil the Japanese steal...
True, but those are oil centers in the game, not resource centers.

Did the Allies ever bomb something that is represented by resource centers in the game? If they didn't, why not? Only because it was inefficient (less important than oil), or because they didn't want to destroy the economies the involved countries?

I've had a discussion with my Japanese PBEM opponent about this and would be very interested in an answer. Probably off topic, though.

EDIT: Since this discussion isn't related to AE I've started another thread: tm.asp?m=1683294
Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Terminus »

I think one reason may have been that oil fields (and especially oil refineries) are point targets, easier to get at with bombers. A rubber plantation or a tin mine are much more difficult.

Also, many of the resource centers were beyond the range of bombers based in India and the top focus of strategic bombing in the CBI theatre was always on transport infrastructure (bridges, ports, etc.)...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6417
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: Bahnsteig

Will there be any changes to prevent different nations to fight in different countries?
Something like the Chinese fighting in Burma, the English fighting in China, or the mixed allied airfleet stationed `42 in China and bombing everything in range?
Bombing occupied resources and oil by the allies should cost PP, no nation would be happy to see their colonies get bombed to dust just because Japan holds them for a while.
Did the allies bomb Dutch recources in the war?


I'm sure the Poles/French/Dutch/Belgians/Norwegians & Danes would be happy if this was a reality.

But this was Total War and every possible target was hit

PS, as the Chinese fought in Burma and USAAC bombers flew from China it would be odd to make rules to keep them out
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15786
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Helpless »

The problem IMHO that there is way too easy to destroy RCs in WITP and it takes way too long and expensive to repair them. Yes, they are not just plain plantation, mines, etc in stock. They do produce supplies, so there is production inside it. Now in AE they got separated. So, probably it makes sence to make much more difficult to destroy RC and much more easier to repair them. This would create more historical situation when transportation was primary target for attacks - ports, AF, convoys, etc.
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Regarding ship refits, anything being done to improve the routine. Two issues.

1) Ships starting refit get new stats at the same time as system damage assigned. Any chance of having to have the damage zeroed before stats are applied as per refit upgrade?

2) Major rebuilds. Some ships were completely transformed, sometimes taking as long as two years to complete. Any chance these can be treated much the same as merchant conversions (AK to AR) and have the appropriate yard time applied?

Thanks[:)]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5189
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Regarding ship refits, anything being done to improve the routine. Two issues.

1) Ships starting refit get new stats at the same time as system damage assigned. Any chance of having to have the damage zeroed before stats are applied as per refit upgrade?

2) Major rebuilds. Some ships were completely transformed, sometimes taking as long as two years to complete. Any chance these can be treated much the same as merchant conversions (AK to AR) and have the appropriate yard time applied?

Thanks[:)]

All completely redone and different. You'll have a whole new set of things to bitch about, Ron.



User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Regarding ship refits, anything being done to improve the routine. Two issues.

1) Ships starting refit get new stats at the same time as system damage assigned. Any chance of having to have the damage zeroed before stats are applied as per refit upgrade?

2) Major rebuilds. Some ships were completely transformed, sometimes taking as long as two years to complete. Any chance these can be treated much the same as merchant conversions (AK to AR) and have the appropriate yard time applied?

Thanks[:)]

All completely redone and different. You'll have a whole new set of things to bitch about, Ron.




Did not know I was bitching there Donald![8D] Cool. How is it different? Toss me a bone to chew on.[:D]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
JamesM
Posts: 1026
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: QLD, Australia

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by JamesM »

Looking at the stuff that is being added I think I am going to have to have a good read of the manual when it comes out before I play it!!!!
rockmedic109
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: Admiral's Edition General Thread

Post by rockmedic109 »

I am hoping the manual makes it out before the game.  That way we can get a head start and play as soon as it is installed. 
 
Might even work as advertisement.&nbsp; Get even more anticipation for the game.&nbsp; <hint>
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”