Stacking Confusion
Moderator: Vic
RE: Stacking Confusion
should I just open a noe thread to get my twice asked ? answered?
"Tanks forward"
RE: Stacking Confusion
@freeboy,
you can see the rules details when selecting attack participators and when you hold mouse over stack points of hex.
kind regards,
Vic
you can see the rules details when selecting attack participators and when you hold mouse over stack points of hex.
kind regards,
Vic
Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics
- Iron Knight
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:49 am
RE: Stacking Confusion
ORIGINAL: Iron Knight
Also, I have seen on the forums discussion of units having different numbers of attacks with different strengths. Where can I find this information?
What about this? [;)] Sorry for all the questions.
RE: Stacking Confusion
ORIGINAL: JAMiAM
the attacker's density is a function of the linear space generated by the number of hexsides attacked through, and allowing for the density of the attacking units to be evenly distributed within this space
Is it from the math textbook ? Attacker's density is the differential form on the tangent bundle of the hex manifold. Mwahahaha.
RE: Stacking Confusion
And you all scoffed when your Math Teacher in High School told you Algebra would be used by you through out your life.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
RE: Stacking Confusion
these numbwers seem way off for scenarios like waw and other large ones.
WAY OFF
WAY OFF
"Tanks forward"
-
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:31 pm
RE: Stacking Confusion
From all this I gather that it would be a bad idea to have any formation with more than 100 stack points, which doesn't seem like much, especially, as freeboy says, in large scenarios, when you want large formations.
Another question (everyone here is so helpful!, gush gush [&o]). Is there any kind of command you can give through HQ's, to their subordinate units? The one that springs to mind is 'regroup' which would mean all units attached to that HQ would automatically move to where it is, if possible. It would be a handy one for the end of a successful operation in a particular theatre. When the fighting is over, you can just order the HQ to regroup, leave them for a few turns, and then reorganise for the next operation. Just a thought.
Another question (everyone here is so helpful!, gush gush [&o]). Is there any kind of command you can give through HQ's, to their subordinate units? The one that springs to mind is 'regroup' which would mean all units attached to that HQ would automatically move to where it is, if possible. It would be a handy one for the end of a successful operation in a particular theatre. When the fighting is over, you can just order the HQ to regroup, leave them for a few turns, and then reorganise for the next operation. Just a thought.
Furthermore, Carthage must be destroyed.
RE: Stacking Confusion
ORIGINAL: Iron Knight
ORIGINAL: Iron Knight
Also, I have seen on the forums discussion of units having different numbers of attacks with different strengths. Where can I find this information?
What about this? [;)] Sorry for all the questions.
Not sure in game how you look at the info but in the editor you look at the Sub Unit and it has that information on one of the headers on how that unit works. Perhaps you can see it from the left side with the graph command, haven't looked at all those options.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
RE: Stacking Confusion
Just click on the subformation and it will display for you all the stats for that type unit, including max number of attacks and number of attacks the unit makes.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
- 82ndtrooper
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:13 am
- Location: tennessee
RE: Stacking Confusion
my head hurts after reading this.
all this math is hard on a old man.
being a military man ill continue to use the priciple of more is better.
as in......
it was a hell of a battle sir. 40 to 2 and we killed em both !!!!!!!
all this math is hard on a old man.
being a military man ill continue to use the priciple of more is better.
as in......
it was a hell of a battle sir. 40 to 2 and we killed em both !!!!!!!
HHC 302nd Engineer Battalion
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80
RE: Stacking Confusion
Air attacks and naval battles ignore these stacking limits, correct?
- Barthheart
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
- Location: Nepean, Ontario
RE: Stacking Confusion
ORIGINAL: all5n
Air attacks and naval battles ignore these stacking limits, correct?
Correct. They also don't get HQ bounses.
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
-
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:58 am
- Location: Netherlands
RE: Stacking Confusion
ORIGINAL: 82ndtrooper
my head hurts after reading this.
all this math is hard on a old man.
being a military man ill continue to use the priciple of more is better.
as in......
it was a hell of a battle sir. 40 to 2 and we killed em both !!!!!!!
"More is better"
Well, not quite. Vic specifically made this so to prevent the use of Überstacks, a killer unit made of 10 heavy tanks and 100 inf. units. Unstoppable in gameplay, and also ruining it. And also reflecting real life situations where too many units just overcrowd the place, not much use for your units when they are still stuck in some traffic jam aren't they?
So, more is better, till a certain point that is.
- 82ndtrooper
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:13 am
- Location: tennessee
RE: Stacking Confusion
I was joking mostly
but....
it can be hard to understand all the math especially when people start tossing out formula's
I play for fun not work.
but....
it can be hard to understand all the math especially when people start tossing out formula's
I play for fun not work.
HHC 302nd Engineer Battalion
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80
RE: Stacking Confusion
It's easy enough to memorize how much Stack the different sftypes take up in the Generic game.
"People are easily amused by quotes." - Some guy with a cool-sounding name
RE: Stacking Confusion
I still don't know what stack point is, is it the weight of the unit?
Favoritism is alive and well here.
- Barthheart
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
- Location: Nepean, Ontario
RE: Stacking Confusion
The weight of the unit is different than the stack points of a unit.
Weight is used when you need to move a unit by strategic movement or by ship.
Stack points are per SFType and represent how big the SFType is in the hex. So a unit's stack points is the total of all the SFTypes in that unit. They are used only to determine if there is crowding during battles. When defending if there is more than 100, default game, stack points in a hex the defender will suffer from crowding. If there are 100 stack points attack from a single hex then the attacker suffers from crowding. For multihex attacks it's 100 +50 per extra hex side... I think.
Both stack points and weight are show in the info box, on the lower edge of the screen, when a unit is selected.
Weight is used when you need to move a unit by strategic movement or by ship.
Stack points are per SFType and represent how big the SFType is in the hex. So a unit's stack points is the total of all the SFTypes in that unit. They are used only to determine if there is crowding during battles. When defending if there is more than 100, default game, stack points in a hex the defender will suffer from crowding. If there are 100 stack points attack from a single hex then the attacker suffers from crowding. For multihex attacks it's 100 +50 per extra hex side... I think.
Both stack points and weight are show in the info box, on the lower edge of the screen, when a unit is selected.
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"