Old Scenarios

Post discussions and advice on TOAW scenario design here.

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky

Post Reply
josephw
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:20 am

Old Scenarios

Post by josephw »

I've only had the game foe a few months, very happy with it by the way, and I've noticed that there a lots of great scenarios avaliable all over the place, but I was wondering if there is a way to update some of the V1 scenarios so I could play them on V3
User avatar
Silvanski
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Belgium, residing in TX-USA

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by Silvanski »

See this thread
 
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1616478
 
Our friend Japlance has converted a bunch of scenarios
The TOAW Redux Dude
ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by ColinWright »

Note that because of increased AA effectiveness, reduced early turn ending, and probably other things as well, converted scenarios may play significantly differently than they did when originally designed.
I am not Charlie Hebdo
User avatar
Silvanski
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Belgium, residing in TX-USA

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by Silvanski »

ORIGINAL: ColinWright

Note that because of increased AA effectiveness, reduced early turn ending, and probably other things as well, converted scenarios may play significantly differently than they did when originally designed.

Amount AA eqp needs to be lowered then, you know by what factor?
The TOAW Redux Dude
ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by ColinWright »

ORIGINAL: Silvanski

ORIGINAL: ColinWright

Note that because of increased AA effectiveness, reduced early turn ending, and probably other things as well, converted scenarios may play significantly differently than they did when originally designed.

Amount AA eqp needs to be lowered then, you know by what factor?

Depends. For example, a lot of equipment has an AA value of one. That used to be marginal, now fifty or so such weapons in a unit make quite a killer.

For what it's worth, in one scenario, I've divided ship AA by five, the value of AA guns proper by three, and modified the rifle squads so they have no AA value. Something like that. It would depend what the effect of the AA fire is and you think it should be.
I am not Charlie Hebdo
User avatar
Silvanski
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Belgium, residing in TX-USA

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by Silvanski »

ORIGINAL: ColinWright
For what it's worth, in one scenario, I've divided ship AA by five, the value of AA guns proper by three, and modified the rifle squads so they have no AA value. Something like that. It would depend what the effect of the AA fire is and you think it should be.

OK, that's a pointer thanks, but as usual a little experimenting will be needed
The TOAW Redux Dude
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 15345
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by Curtis Lemay »

Be aware that version 3.3 (assuming it ever gets posted) will factor AAA lethality by 0.4.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
secadegas
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:47 am

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by secadegas »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

(...) version 3.3 (assuming it ever gets posted) (...)

Why not?

I'm willing to pay... for it. Can't stand the jumping sceen no more...

ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Old Scenarios

Post by ColinWright »

ORIGINAL: Silvanski

ORIGINAL: ColinWright
For what it's worth, in one scenario, I've divided ship AA by five, the value of AA guns proper by three, and modified the rifle squads so they have no AA value. Something like that. It would depend what the effect of the AA fire is and you think it should be.

OK, that's a pointer thanks, but as usual a little experimenting will be needed

Oh definitely. For one thing, what's appropriate for one scenario won't be appropriate for another. TOAW assumes that all battles are essentially the same. That's a useful concept -- but hardly an unqualified truth.

Really, one would need to have some familiarity with what actually happened in each case. Then play the scenario, and adjust things until the results start to resemble what actually occurred. I.e., if SG 103 supported the attack on the infantry division at _____ and historically felt quite chipper afterwards, with two planes damaged and one shot down, something's wrong if the scenario's yielding losses of 28 out of 36 aircraft engaged.

Of course, all that would be a lot of work...
I am not Charlie Hebdo
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”