IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and bitter defeats here.

Moderator: Vic

User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Sept. 1 1940

Germans pour over the Polish border!

Poles pull back to protect Warsaw.
(Normally I collapse all the leftover Poles to get the free PP. This game it would have been 11 PP, but there are enough of them left I felt it might make a good defence and cost him some time and men.)

French and British governments pledge the protection of Polish borders... but really just start protecting their own interests.
(BEF landed in France and attahed to the French GHQ. Maginot troops start repositioning to protect border. The Germans will lose the "Blitz" card if he occupies the border forts so I'm not staying while he can bombard me with arty!. French start building engineers to build more forts. Also PP production stepped up because I'm going to use the "French Prepared" card, costs 60 PP to play. This gives the French 2 armoured corps plus cancels the German bonus against the French.)

Royal Navy bombards Kiel in hopes of keeping the Kreigsmarine bottled up in the Baltic.
(This is only mildly annoying to the Germans but keeps him honest. But if it's ignored, I'll land troops there and be a real pain.)

Commonwealth nations around the world flock to the Empire's call to arms.
(Canada starts making destroyers, India starts making engineers to build a road/bridge to China, South Africa ships troops to fight in Italian East Africa, Australia starts recruiting troops to spread around the Pacific Islands.)

Image
Attachments
WaW_01.jpg
WaW_01.jpg (212.41 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by seille »

Please keep us informed how this version plays compared to the original waw32.
I´m interested to know how the changes "feel" in the game for both sides
Things they make possible/impossible/harder and so on.
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Oct. 1, 1939

Poland Surrenders! Germans occupy Warsaw!
(Well I didn't delay his capturing Warsaw even 1 turn. So I only got 6 PP out of left over Polish troops/HQ, ie wasted 5 PP. To work the delay would have had to have been many turns more, he has until April to get ready for invasion of France, and since this isn't possible, I blew this operation completely. Oh well, always go with what you know works![:-])

Australia sends troops to protect Pacific interests of the Empire!
(First troops sent to Rabaul)

South Africa sends troops to help against Italian East African agression!
(Not much else happend this turn. Building lots of supplies and PP for coming upgrades.)
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Nov. 1, 1939

Royal Navy withdraws from German coast!
(Well, after 2 turns of blasting German troops, he rolled up with arty and Carrier Air. I lost a Crusier and a Battleship for his 1 arty and 5 carrier air. Not a good trade but he was forced to build 20 carrier to drive me off and as they are not as good as fighters I'll count that as 10 fighters not built as well.)

Canadian Navy puts to Sea!
(4 destroyers leave Canada and take up station to guard against u-boats in the Atlantic.)

(British commandos and troop ships positioned to fight for Norway when the Germand invade. Keeping Norway out of German hands does two things: keeps Swedish Iron Ore from Germany (1000 supplies) and protects Lend-Lease lanes to Russia when the time comes. If Germany owns Bergen then you lose some of the lend-lease you send to Russia)



Image
Attachments
Waw_03.jpg
Waw_03.jpg (329 KiB) Viewed 366 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Nov.1 , 1939

France's Gen. DeGaulle convinces government that a new kind of war is coming and the old arrangement of armour units will have to be changesd.
(Used this card this turn. Germans won't know this until he plays his "Blitz" card in April.)


Image

(Expensive, but worth it!)
Attachments
FP.jpg
FP.jpg (25.05 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Nov. 1, 1939

Indian forces on the move in asia!
(Indian engineers are preparing to build a road and brides to Hanoi to later help the Chinese. Also the Saigon garrison moves to Bangkok. If Germany establishes Vichy after the fall of France, Hanoi and Saigon and all the land east of that north-south river become Japanese. If Western troops are there when that happens, they are lost! Road to Hanoi can only be completed up to second bridge until hat time so we don't lose the engineer unit.)

Image
Attachments
Asia_03.jpg
Asia_03.jpg (177.52 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Dec. 1, 1939

Sitzkrieg.... this is the term the press is using to describe the Allies indecision about attacking the Germans while the Germans continue to mass along the borders of France and the Low Countries.
(Not much happening. Winter set in so a lot of northern production is going to supplies. India, South Africa and Australia continue to build troops. I need to build more PP to upgrade my troops.)
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Jan. 1, 1940

Sitzkreig continues in Europe, while in other parts of the world teh Commonwealth continues to gear up for a wider conflict.
(Still not much happening, so I'll show a pic of the Allies production schedule.)

Image
Attachments
WaW_05.jpg
WaW_05.jpg (149.48 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

Feb. 1, 1940

Still the mighty armies of France and Britian sit idle as the German war machine grinds Poland under it's iron heel of oppression.
(Still quiet and winter. Winter uses a lot of supplies, so not much being built either. Here's what the Aussie delpoyment looks like so far.)

Image
Attachments
Waw_06.jpg
Waw_06.jpg (137.23 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

March 1, 1940

The German grip on Poland seems firm as ever as Allied forces do nothing.
(Still nothing happening and still winter. Madly producing PP for research.)
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

April 1, 1940

Snow in April! No April Fools joke here folks, this has been an especially long and hard winter. Just one more thing to add to the tension and dread in Europe.
(Late snow is rare and really heurts the Germans more than the French as hie readiness doesn't fully recover by the time he wants to attack. Also, something new, I guess, is that I can't build forts in winter! Very frustrating and putting a wrench in the French defence plans. I usually have threee forts around Paris by now, but have one so far!!! Used PP to get Fighter II upgrade. Real hard decision about this Infantry II or Fighter II?!? I desided that Fighter II will help more to keep England safe from sealion than Inf II.... we'll see....)

Image
Attachments
WaW_08.jpg
WaW_08.jpg (109.63 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by JAMiAM »

ORIGINAL: Barthheart

(Late snow is rare and really heurts the Germans more than the French as hie readiness doesn't fully recover by the time he wants to attack. Also, something new, I guess, is that I can't build forts in winter! Very frustrating and putting a wrench in the French defence plans. I usually have threee forts around Paris by now, but have one so far!!!
The problem isn't that you can't build forts in the winter. The problem is that you're not producing enough supplies.

My mod that Tom used a few versions back as a new base for WaW introduced constructable LocTypes having a supply cost, in addition to PP and EP. If you have insufficient supplies in the engineer unit's HQ, then you can't build the LocType. Since many players neglect their supplies during the winter, especially with the very high supply costs in the last few versions, you can be in for a nasty surprise...
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM

ORIGINAL: Barthheart

(Late snow is rare and really heurts the Germans more than the French as hie readiness doesn't fully recover by the time he wants to attack. Also, something new, I guess, is that I can't build forts in winter! Very frustrating and putting a wrench in the French defence plans. I usually have threee forts around Paris by now, but have one so far!!!
The problem isn't that you can't build forts in the winter. The problem is that you're not producing enough supplies.

My mod that Tom used a few versions back as a new base for WaW introduced constructable LocTypes having a supply cost, in addition to PP and EP. If you have insufficient supplies in the engineer unit's HQ, then you can't build the LocType. Since many players neglect their supplies during the winter, especially with the very high supply costs in the last few versions, you can be in for a nasty surprise...

James,

I don't think that's it. Eng unit has 690 EP, HQ has 500+ supply, 140 PP. Just trying to build a fortification - 250 PP, 4 PP, 66 supply....

EDIT: DOH! Just checked again and you're right HQ only has 54 not 540 supplies. I'm maddly producin supplies but just keeping up. It's this damn long winter!!! [:@]
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

May 1, 1940.

IT'S WAR!!!
German troops have poured across the frontiers of many peaceful European nations! Denmark falls without a shot being fired! Belgium, Luxemburg and the Netherlands all crushed by the fast moving panzers of the German Reich! Lille France captured! Norway invaded! Uboats spotted in the North Sea!

The Allies are slow to respond to this lightening attack. If it weren't for the forsight of French Gen. De Gaulle, more of France would have fallen in the opening thrust. Even so the loss of troops on the Allied side has been tremendous!

Canadian destroyer squadrons viciously attack the ubout menace in the North Sea. French and British troop in France dig in for a tough fight.

(He attacked as expected this turn and my "France Prepared" card has helped... but maybe not enough. He captured Lille which activates Italy.... My Canadian DD units maul the uboats by sinking 4 without loss. Nad he's got sub II!!! And inf II!!! I seem to be behind a bit. But I also notice that he is heavy into mechanisation - lots of tanks, halftracks etc. This will cost him a lot of supplies in this version... hope that slows done his troop rpoduction later on.)

Image
Attachments
WaW_09.jpg
WaW_09.jpg (297.34 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

May 1, 1940.

Elsewhere in the world:
British troops invade Italian controlled Libya and take Bardia and advance on Tobruk.
(This is more annoying things I like to do. If he dosen't respond I get NA for little effort and can threaten Italy easily.)

Image
Attachments
WaW_09a.jpg
WaW_09a.jpg (95.77 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

May 1, 1940.

Also:
British troops in Berbera set out to destroy the Italian control of Ethiopia.
(There are rifles, staff and a destroyer here. Many people forget about them. I like to kill them quick as the destroyer can threaten supplies to Egypt. Also don't want him to farm the HQ for 5 PP! If he watches his battle report closely he'll catch on... but it's worth the try.)

Image
Attachments
WaW_09b.jpg
WaW_09b.jpg (40.62 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
zook08
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:27 pm

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by zook08 »

ORIGINAL: Barthheart

Feb. 1, 1940

Still the mighty armies of France and Britian sit idle as the German war machine grinds Poland under it's iron heel of oppression.
(Still quiet and winter. Winter uses a lot of supplies, so not much being built either. Here's what the Aussie delpoyment looks like so far.)

Image

Why do you garrison islands in the pacific?
User avatar
Barthheart
Posts: 3079
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Nepean, Ontario

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by Barthheart »

I'm attempting to keep the Japs from getting any free airbases/ports in the Pacific. It should make it harder for him to control the sea on the advance to his home islands.... I hope....
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"
zook08
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:27 pm

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by zook08 »

I still think the naval modelling is a bit broken here. Fleets can operate for a year without resupplying, and with no air/naval interception possible, airbases are pretty useless unless someone parks his fleet directly adjacent to your island.
User avatar
von altair
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:22 pm

RE: IRONCROM-vs-Barthheart-WAW-(Allied view)

Post by von altair »

So what version you guys are playing? If something else than waw33c1, it will be bugged and should not attack at all at winter, since mods are not there :)
"An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur?"

"Do you not know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?"

-Axel Oxenstierna
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”