This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by wild_Willie2 »

Hi there.

Another example of one of my annoyances.

DD's hitting a target at 19000!!! yards..

Even CA's with much better spotting and fire controls would have trouble SEEING a target at 19K, let alone HITTING it...

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (118.47 KiB) Viewed 250 times
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
Cuttlefish
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Cuttlefish »

Let's see...19,000 yards is a bit under 11 miles. Your ships would be within visual range at that distance. Banckert had no radar that I know of, but the Bofors 12cm/50 guns she was equipped with had a listed range of 21,300 yards.

So theoretically it would be possible for Banckert to see and hit your ships at that range. What I don't know (but I'll bet others here do) is how likely it would actually be. My guess is that it would take such a huge amount of luck that any Dutch destroyer captain would decline to open fire until the range had shortened considerably, but perhaps I am wrong about that.
Image
User avatar
Przemcio231
Posts: 1901
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Przemcio231 »

Hey Willie i see you started a game[;)] i started one a month ago and i say im winning as allies[;)] its february 1942 and i just plastered the baby KB[:D]
Image

Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by wild_Willie2 »

Hi Przemco.
 
This is an AI game, I can't really go back to PBEM anymore because I think I was a teenyweeny ADDICTED to it....
 
As you know, this game via PBEM is like heroin, you always want to play just ONE MORE TURN..... 
 
To keep my current relationship save (PBEM has the tendency to EAT up all your spare time (even the time you really can't spend on it and SHOULD spend on your GF)), I will just play an AI game until AE is released. Once AE is released al bets are of though......
 
Gr.
 
William
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

Hi there.

Another example of one of my annoyances.

DD's hitting a target at 19000!!! yards..
Yes, but to counter balance that, last night my Japanese BBs refused to fire shot (ammo was full) while the Boise sank 2 cruisers and a destroyer at 4000 yards. [8|]
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
bradfordkay
Posts: 8684
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by bradfordkay »

" As you know, this game via PBEM is like heroin, you always want to play just ONE MORE TURN....."

To me, that's the beauty of PBEM... on normal workdays, we can basically get just one turn done so I don't expect more. I know that the war is progressing slowly, but it's interesting enough that the pace doesn't bother me. We started our game on Feb 6, 2007 and I'll be watching the June 8, 1943 turn when I next run the game - so in sixteen months of real time we have played eighteen months of the war. That's actually better than I espected when I started the game (the faster pace is due to the addictive nature of PBEM!).
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Przemcio231
Posts: 1901
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Przemcio231 »

Well im not addicted... i do a turn a day and if time permits more...[:D] my GF is not complaining so no problem...[:D]
Image

Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

Hi there.

Another example of one of my annoyances.

DD's hitting a target at 19000!!! yards..

Even CA's with much better spotting and fire controls would have trouble SEEING a target at 19K, let alone HITTING it...

Truthfully, Mauritius would probably sink both of those targets before anything else got into range, and she probably wouldn't open fire at 19,000 yards. Thing is that these targets can't really fight, and can't run away..., so the attacking TF would generally close in to more certain range before engaging simply to save ammunition.

The game's AI think's subs fight DD's on the surface.., so you can't really expect much better from it.
Grell
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 8:16 pm
Location: Canada

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Grell »

Very well put mike.

Regards,


Greg
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4957
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

So, will AE allow boarding parties?
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

So, will AE allow boarding parties?

Not sure about that, but i tend to doubt it...

Curiously, a precursor game of WiTP allowed it (War in the South Pacific) - and actually had a better weather model as well. [8D] It also allowed a bit of maneuvering in a surface battle (very crude combat maneuver model, but was probably more "fun" than the WITP one.)
Chris21wen
Posts: 7700
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Chris21wen »

ORIGINAL: Przemcio231

Hey Willie i see you started a game[;)] i started one a month ago and i say im winning as allies[;)] its february 1942 and i just plastered the baby KB[:D]

He did indeed.[8|]
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: Przemcio231

Well im not addicted... i do a turn a day and if time permits more...[:D] my GF is not complaining so no problem...[:D]

Awesome girlfriend! Does she have any single friends she could introduce me to? My fiance gets peeved even if I just play a turn or two of an AI game every other day or so. [:-] I have a feeling that if AE comes out before our wedding date of Sept 26, the wedding just may have to be called off! [:D]
User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by thegreatwent »

Ice, your marriage is doomed if AE comes out prior to your wedding.


Congrats on landing a lady before WitP destroys your social life btw[:D]
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

Congrats on landing a lady before WitP destroys your social life btw[:D]

Well, WiTP had destroyed the social life for a long while. But then I pretty much quit "cold turkey". In that WiTP-free existence, I remembered this fantastic thing called "female companionship". I got caught up in that rediscovery for quite a while, but now I'm getting that WiTP itch again. [:(]

A few weeks ago, I installed WiTP on my fiance's desktop, and lately, the game has been calling for me in the middle of the night. [:D] About a week ago, I actually woke up around midnight to go to the bathroom and booted up the game once I had finished my business. I played for about four hours - it would have been a bit longer if my fiance hadn't woken up and asked me what I was doing!
User avatar
fokkov
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:55 pm
Location: Gouda, Holland

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by fokkov »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

So, will AE allow boarding parties?

Not sure about that, but i tend to doubt it...

Curiously, a precursor game of WiTP allowed it (War in the South Pacific) - and actually had a better weather model as well. [8D] It also allowed a bit of maneuvering in a surface battle (very crude combat maneuver model, but was probably more "fun" than the WITP one.)


Finally someone that knows and played this game (War in the South Pacific) , the AE team should have a look at it, setting TF as targets , assigning escorts planes to strike groups etc. some things are way better done .
Almost trying a year now get the game running again on an old machine without luck because of missing vesa drivers. [:@]
in to deep and out of time
User avatar
Mark VII
Posts: 1849
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 6:41 am
Location: Brentwood,TN

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Mark VII »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2

Hi there.

Another example of one of my annoyances.

DD's hitting a target at 19000!!! yards..

Even CA's with much better spotting and fire controls would have trouble SEEING a target at 19K, let alone HITTING it...

Truthfully, Mauritius would probably sink both of those targets before anything else got into range, and she probably wouldn't open fire at 19,000 yards. Thing is that these targets can't really fight, and can't run away..., so the attacking TF would generally close in to more certain range before engaging simply to save ammunition.

The game's AI think's subs fight DD's on the surface.., so you can't really expect much better from it.

The problem with the game is that often "slower" ships somehow escape "faster" ships all the time. I am pleased if they start shooting no matter the range.
Image
User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by thegreatwent »

A few weeks ago, I installed WiTP on my fiance's desktop, and lately, the game has been calling for me in the middle of the night. About a week ago, I actually woke up around midnight to go to the bathroom and booted up the game once I had finished my business. I played for about four hours - it would have been a bit longer if my fiance hadn't woken up and asked me what I was doing!

LOL, my wife has had to put up with me doing this as well. I often dream of another way to get more oil where I need it despite allied subs [>:]
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by Hornblower »

once home from work, and having completed any necessary work around the house i'd play.  Now if the mrs went to bed early, i'd put in hours of WITP time.  on more occasions then i'd care to admit, i's play till 3-4am in the morning..
User avatar
DaveB
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 11:59 pm
Location: Forres Scotland
Contact:

RE: This has ALWAYS annoyed me....

Post by DaveB »

I get far more annoyed when an AK gets pounded to scrap but then somehow manages to knock lumps out of my DD/CL... I can't help feeling that after the first few hits the merch crew ought to be having trouble standing upright, never mind firing like some sort of elite 4" sniper team. Sometimes the exchange of shells and damage seems to get far too close to 50:50, which just seems highly unlikely to me.
 
Dave
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”