LRCAP from Carriers?

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

User avatar
Didz
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: UK

LRCAP from Carriers?

Post by Didz »

Can anyone confirm that Carrier fighter groups are able to provide LRCAP over nearby TF's?

I've tried it repeatedly but have yet to see it actually work although it seems to operate fine with land based fighters and fighter bombers.
Didz
Fortis balore et armis
User avatar
82nd Airborne
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Coquitlam, B.C., Canada

Re: LRCAP from Carriers?

Post by 82nd Airborne »

Originally posted by Didz
Can anyone confirm that Carrier fighter groups are able to provide LRCAP over nearby TF's?

I've tried it repeatedly but have yet to see it actually work although it seems to operate fine with land based fighters and fighter bombers.
Sorry, I can't answer that definately although I *think* I've seen it.

Your post brought to mind another issue with the LRCAP though. I keep having P38's pick a TF and stay with it from turn to turn. The base is PM, and their are Aircobras, Kittys, etc, and they are all set to LRCAP with the Commanders decision, yet the P38s always pick a TF, and it remains their mission at the start of the next turn(s). Why is this?
"I leave you, hoping that the lamp of liberty will burn in your bosoms until there shall no longer be a doubt that all men are created free and equal." - Abraham Lincoln
iancollins
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Southern England

Post by iancollins »

You need to ask your Commander that question....... :)

But..... more seriously...... one of the interesting parts of UV is knowing when to give your Commanders decision-making ability.........
Ian Collins
Hartmann
Posts: 883
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Hartmann »

I can at the very least confirm that it works if you designate a target yourself, but then only with respect to hexes, not TFs as such.

Sometimes, I seem to get "commander's discretion" LRCAP from landbases for moving transports, but I haven't seen it yet from CVs.

In fact, that's why I usually manually give LRCAP from CVs only to transports already ashore and unloading.

When the CVs have nothing better to do, you can also set them to follow your transports, and the normal CAP will then protect them splendidly ... just be sure to revoke that command in time, or else the CVs will end up in the enemy ports or beaches. :)

Hartmann
AlvinS
Posts: 659
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 10:00 am
Location: O'Fallon, Missouri
Contact:

Post by AlvinS »

I have designated LRCAP from Air Combat TF's to cover transport TF's while they land and it works fine. You get the report when the mission is being flown. I designated Wild Cats to fly the LRCAP mission and that is what is shown in the report.:cool:
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." ---Mark Twain

Naval Warfare Simulations

AlvinS
Hartmann
Posts: 883
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Hartmann »

Originally posted by AlvinS
I have designated LRCAP from Air Combat TF's to cover transport TF's while they land and it works fine. You get the report when the mission is being flown. I designated Wild Cats to fly the LRCAP mission and that is what is shown in the report.:cool:
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant, too. :)

Hmm, I'm really interested now whether anyone had computer controlled LRCAP from CVs covering still moving transports in another than the CV's hex? Is this at all possible in the game?

Hartmann
User avatar
Avenger
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2002 11:38 pm

Post by Avenger »

Along about August, the Japanese computer AI stopped being reckless in my game. With 99 aircraft shot down, it started being really, really careful in choosing targets. This needs to be understood in order to understand the following statement.

As my transpport craft were approaching my bases, the base north of Lea (Frenschurt?) and the base at Buna, they were nailed hard by the Japanese aircraft based out of Lea. This was very annoying, so I reloaded the day, with all of my orders complete, and made two changes. I ordered LRCAP on both of those task forces. One was fighters out of Buna. The other was LRCAP from my CV sitting in Gili Gili. I got no messages when I repeated the turn, but the Japanese did not then attack those transports. From past experience of repeating turns, the Japanese always do the same thing. This time they did not.

--Avenger
User avatar
Didz
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: UK

Post by Didz »

So just to clarify.

What you are saying is that LRCAP works from carriers IF you designate the target manually. But not if you leave it to the commanders discretion.

If so that might explain why my CV's don't seem to provide LRCAP as I usually leave my Air Base commanders to decide which TF's to provide the cover over.
Didz
Fortis balore et armis
HardTimes
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 3:20 am
Location: Drexel Hill, PA
Contact:

Post by HardTimes »

yeah definitely works when you target the TF to CAP...just finished watching a turn and my 2 squadron LRCAP wreaked havoc on some unescorted betty's attacking my amphibious task force.
dgaad
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Hockeytown

Post by dgaad »

You can have fighters fly from carriers using LRCAP and specifically target any TF. Its an excellent way to protect other fleets, and usually surprises the bejeezus out of the enemy.
Last time I checked, the forums were messed up. ;)
Hartmann
Posts: 883
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Hartmann »

Anyone seen this at "commander´s discretion" yet? :)

Hartmann
User avatar
Pkunzipper
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 1:27 pm

Post by Pkunzipper »

Yes, I ordered a Zero group on a CV to do a LRCAP at commander discretion, and they covered a Transport TF on a nearby hex(I was told about this by a message (like supply plane interception)....

Unluckly the enemy airstrike acquired as target my CV TF that left without protection....
User avatar
Didz
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:00 am
Location: UK

Post by Didz »

Originally posted by Pkunzipper
Yes, I ordered a Zero group on a CV to do a LRCAP at commander discretion, and they covered a Transport TF on a nearby hex(I was told about this by a message (like supply plane interception)....

Unluckly the enemy airstrike acquired as target my CV TF that left without protection....
Are! so it does work but doesn't happen very often.
Didz
Fortis balore et armis
thantis
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cooksville, MD

Post by thantis »

That's exactly how I lost the Hornet. I decided to try LRCAP from the Hornet to protect my amphibs at Gili Gili. Well, the commander did (and I did not have a specific target - commander's discretion), but the Japs decided that time would be perfect to launch everything they had at my task force.

Without Wildcats, I was creamed. Lost the Hornet, two CLAAs, and a couple of destroyers. Only specify LRCAP if you are south of the task force you are protecting....
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon.....
User avatar
Admiral DadMan
Posts: 3407
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit

LCAP in Reverse

Post by Admiral DadMan »

I just had LCAP from Lunga cover my 3 US CV's, and just stood back to watch the fun. I figured that Lunga wasn't gonna sink from a torpedo attack, so why not?:D

It worked quite well, as I just kept chewing up attacks as they came...
Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:
Image
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39680
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

LRCAP

Post by Erik Rutins »

A possibily important note is that LR-CAP from land bases is less effective at covering Air Combat TFs than vice versa. The practice of frequent maneuvers and radio silence made Air Combat TFs a bit difficult to track even for friendlies and thus you'll see a smaller percentage of assigned planes actually on CAP than you would over a land base or a Transport TF. The best CAP for carriers is always the CAP they send up themselves. :)

In an early PBEM game, I used some CAP from a carrier to cover a base while a base further back that wasn't in range of the first base used its fighters to give CAP to my carrier. When a Japanese strike came in, I found that I had a much thinner CAP than I had expected and I paid for that. :eek:

Regards,

- Erik
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
User avatar
von Murrin
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 10:00 am
Location: That from which there is no escape.

Post by von Murrin »

Somebody else has figured it out. :D

Edit: Originally posted in regard to Adm. Dman's comment. Bah! Erik and his lightning fingers! ;) :D
I give approximately two fifths of a !#$% at any given time!
Sonny
Posts: 2005
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 9:51 pm

Post by Sonny »

Originally posted by Pkunzipper
Yes, I ordered a Zero group on a CV to do a LRCAP at commander discretion, and they covered a Transport TF on a nearby hex(I was told about this by a message (like supply plane interception)....

Unluckly the enemy airstrike acquired as target my CV TF that left without protection....
Guess that's why at commanders discretion they don't often send their on long range patrol. Pretty smart commanders.:)
Quote from Snigbert -

"If you mess with the historical accuracy, you're going to have ahistorical outcomes."

"I'll say it again for Sonny's sake: If you mess with historical accuracy, you're going to have
ahistorical outcomes. "
User avatar
Admiral DadMan
Posts: 3407
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit

Post by Admiral DadMan »

Originally posted by von Murrin
Edit: Originally posted in regard to Adm. Dman's comment. Bah!
von:

HA! It was brought to my attention that using LCAP to bolster my CV's CAP was ahistorical. My reply was that having the IJN's CARDIVs One and Two being afloat after 4 June 42 was ahistorical too...:D
Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:
Image
User avatar
von Murrin
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 10:00 am
Location: That from which there is no escape.

Post by von Murrin »

Originally posted by Admiral DadMan

von:

HA! It was brought to my attention that using LCAP to bolster my CV's CAP was ahistorical. My reply was that having the IJN's CARDIVs One and Two being afloat after 4 June 42 was ahistorical too...:D
The portion you replied to was written cuz the first part didn't make sense after Erik interposed his rather helpful answer as I was typing up my response. ;)

As to ahistorical tactics:

Land-based LRCAP was the first thing I tried using to defeat the IJN uber strike TF.

Yeah it's ahistorical, but so is port striking Rabaul with 150 B-17's at 1000ft, as well as using 30 IJN DD's to safely bring an invasion force to PM, as are gamey DD rushes against CV TF's, or transporting engineers and supplies to Woodlark Is. with PBY's. :p

Hmmm, methinks we share much more of the same "joy of toys" understanding than at first appeared. :D
I give approximately two fifths of a !#$% at any given time!
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”