1.03.13 BETA summary

[Michael T]

Well our Gold Coast group like the idea. I hope it makes it as an option at least. That way if you don't like it don't use it. I like the idea of being able to remedy a problem if it arises. Rather than a game or player being upset because 'computer says no' [:)]

[gazfun]

ORIGINAL: krak

Well our Gold Coast group like the idea. I hope it makes it as an option at least. That way if you don't like it don't use it. I like the idea of being able to remedy a problem if it arises. Rather than a game or player being upset because 'computer says no' [:)]

This simplistic..........in reality its a lot differant than that

[bresh]

Well. i dont think all players just vote againt one.
 
Anyway, as far as i read Marshall cant fix all, like St. Petersburg occupied by enemy troops during eco-phase.
This editor would allow a game to adjust Russias $ and pp to actually apply the EIA-rule, and been in EIANW-rulebook from the start.
 
Otherwise Russia is completely safe from GB/SP and i doubt any games who started before this was reported, where aware of the rulechange.(1.Capital).
 
Some suggested moving the Capital there, but then its Turkey who looses his chance.
 
Regards
Bresh

[JanSorensen]

If you dont like it then dont use. I fail to see why there is a need to complain about something like this. Obviously, it does not mean that bugs should not be fixed - but this allows groups who so desires to correct things until a real fix comes along. I say again - if you dont like it then dont use it and stipulate so when joining a game to avoid any risk of getting into an argument later on.

Several people have infact asked and asked again for something like this - so try to remember than noone can please everyone all the time.

[gazfun]

Well I have an opinion like you and everyone else.
Im just trying to say, that using this CAN cause problems for PBEM players, while in a current game, even after all is agreed to before hand.

[eske]

While I like as much flexibility as possible I recognize presence of such options opens up for discussions about rules and oppinions during a game.
And such discussions can of course cause the feeling that some players are trying to win the game that way, which easilly can stop the game right there.
 
But I believe if proper agreements are made up ahead of the game it won't happen. And I do hope players can be trusted to avoid such trouble, so this option can remain also after it no longer is needed for 'in-game bugfixing'.
 
Btw. would it be interesting to have a host, not playing the game ?
 
/eske

[Marshall Ellis]

Didn't realize there were so many opinions LOL!
 
 

[Thresh]

You've obviously never played FtF [;)]

I've seen rules conflicts kill some good friendships over this game...one pf the perverse reasons I like it so...

T

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

Didn't realize there were so many opinions LOL!

[Send Private Message] Report | Post #: 18
RE: 1.03.13 BETA summary - 7/23/2008 12:21:06 PM
New Messages

[Marshall Ellis]

I've played FtF BUT don't think we ever finished a game LOL! Definitely, this game will strengthen a friendship!