ORIGINAL: larizona55
...
I certainly understand the issue about only one scenario, and putting my computer gamer hat on, I agree. But putting my boardgamer hat on, Kharkov is similar in price to a good board game, and stands up very well when compared to one.
Larry
hmmm... Please allow me to take another look at this comparison.
Kharkov costs me £31 (since we are comparing to a physical item, I'll have to use the physical version)or USD 56 at today's rate, now let's compare this with some boardgames that fall under the same scope as the Kharkov game:
Beyond the Urals - USD 19.87
Borodino 41 - USD 25.43
Cherkassy Pocket - USD 37.87
Drive on Stalingrad - USD 39.87
Gotterdammerung - USD 21.87
Op Kremlin - USD 31.87
Op Spark - UDS 32.87
Red God of War - USD 19.87
Roads to Leningrad - USD 24.87
Stalingrad Pocket - USD 27.87
Triumphant Return - USD 21.87
Turning the Tables - USD 24.87
Velikye Luki - USD 21.87
Battles for the Ardennes - USD 33.87
FAB : The Bulge - USD 36.87
NUTS - USD 35.87
Screaming Eagles in Holland - USD 36.43
Burma : USD 42.87
Tiger of Malaya : USD 52.87
(prices collected from
http://wargamedepot.com/catalog/index.p ... 1d393cd5d7)
I left out OOP games, or games that by their scale completely dwarf the scope of Kharkov and that therefore would be redundant to compare, even on this list there are games that whilst covering a single operation provide a series of scenarios.
I do think that I could buy any of those boardgames before I was even close to buy Kharkov, not to mention that some of them would provide me more than one scenario / battle, hence more theoretical bang for the buck. Also, in general one can argue that a computer game has got an AI, what if I'm not interested and only PBEM? You could also argue that you get a scenario editor, but has we have all seen before , the inclusion is not per se a guarantee of any form that new scenarios will arrive, from the community.
All in all it's a simple discussion, and it's down to what one personally considers as value for money, and this is vastly different from person to person...