Transport a/c capacity

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

Transport a/c capacity

Post by tsimmonds »

Transport aircraft have capacity limits like "2500" and "3500". That would be 2500 and 3500 of what unit of measure? What is the realtionship between this unit of measure and the load points that are used when loading ships?
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Mr.Frag »

drop the last zero ... sorry brain snapped ... drop the last 2 zeros ...

100 pounds = 1 factor, not 10 pounds = 1 factor
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by tsimmonds »

So we're saying that a Topsy (Capacity 2500) can take 250 load points, the same as one DD in a FT?
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Mr.Frag »

No, ships are rated differently. Look at the load factors in the Data screen.

make that drop two zeros, my brains running backwards today.

100 pounds = 1 load factor not 10 pounds [;)]

plug it in:

C-47 (10000 lbs) / 100 (convert to load factors) = 100

devide by item size (support = 20) = 100 / 20 = 5

therefore a single C-47 moves 5 Support per trip

A group of 16 = 5 x 16 or 80

A standard HQ is about 300 so 300 / 80 or 4 days at normal range.
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by tsimmonds »

That looks better; thanks Frag.
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
rominet
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: Paris

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by rominet »

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

No, ships are rated differently. Look at the load factors in the Data screen.

make that drop two zeros, my brains running backwards today.

100 pounds = 1 load factor not 10 pounds [;)]

plug it in:

C-47 (10000 lbs) / 100 (convert to load factors) = 100

devide by item size (support = 20) = 100 / 20 = 5

therefore a single C-47 moves 5 Support per trip

A group of 16 = 5 x 16 or 80

A standard HQ is about 300 so 300 / 80 or 4 days at normal range.

Well and what about supply?
Image
Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Mistmatz »

Wasn't there also a limitation in maximum size? For example planes cannot transport tanks and other heavy equipment. Can't remember the size limit or relation to load capacity though. Anybodyelse maybe?
If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by witpqs »

What are guys, archeologists? How did you even find this thread?
User avatar
Cav Trooper
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:08 pm
Location: Clinton, South Carolina

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Cav Trooper »

My question isn't how they find this thread, but where and why their search even began?????

3rd ACR Tanker
3/4 US Cav Trooper
Brave Rifles

"Professional soldiers are predictable; the world is full of dangerous amateurs."
User avatar
Charbroiled
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: Oregon

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Charbroiled »

ORIGINAL: 3rd ACR Tanker

My question isn't how they find this thread, but where and why their search even began?????


It was dug up through the sticky threads and I gave a link to it in another post to answer a question.
"When I said I would run, I meant 'away' ". - Orange
User avatar
rominet
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: Paris

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by rominet »

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled

ORIGINAL: 3rd ACR Tanker

My question isn't how they find this thread, but where and why their search even began?????


It was dug up through the sticky threads and I gave a link to it in another post to answer a question.

That's right, i am not an archeologist, just a cat [:D] but i don't have the answer to my question yet.
Image
Yamato hugger
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Yamato hugger »

If I remember correctly 1 supply point is 100 transport points. But if you would like to confirm this, fly a supply mission to an unoccupied base and note supply levels before and after and number of planes.

Then you can answer your own question.
User avatar
Micke II
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: Paris France

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Micke II »


A load capacity of 2000 for a transport plane as Dakota C47 allows to carry 5 supply point per rotation.
The transport load for a combat squad is 2000 points but 4000 for a support squad.
Dakota can carry also small gun as AT 57 mm but smaller air plane can’t.
A seaplane as Emily as a load capacity of 4400 points, american Coronada 8000 points !
 
User avatar
rominet
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: Paris

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by rominet »

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

If I remember correctly 1 supply point is 100 transport points. But if you would like to confirm this, fly a supply mission to an unoccupied base and note supply levels before and after and number of planes.

Then you can answer your own question.

Well, nice idea, i did the test:
with 16 C-47 Dakota and an increase of 80 supply per turn.
As any C-47 has a load capacity of 10000, it gives
1 supply point per 2000 load capacity per day
Image
Oldguard1970
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Hiawassee, GA

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Oldguard1970 »

Air transport in stock has another twist to it.  The allies can airlift half-tracks and light tanks!  Obviously, that is not faithful to historical capabilities.  I guess it is some sort of glitch in a data-base value. 
"Rangers Lead the Way!"
Milman
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Serbia

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Milman »

When you say "transport point", Do you mean "AP point" or "AK point" ?
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7206
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Feinder »

2000 AC load factor = 1 supply
 
-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
Yamato hugger
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by Yamato hugger »

ORIGINAL: Milman

When you say "transport point", Do you mean "AP point" or "AK point" ?

Neither. A C-47 has 10,000 "transport points". In this case 1 "transport point" is a pound. A "transport point" on an AP means something else, on an AK something else, and an oiler some else yet. A supply point is a ton (I guess) on an airplane. I was thinking it was 100 pounds. Im human I make mistakes (and Im old and have forgotten a lot of this stuff).

If you use supply being 1 ton as a basis for weight / volume then you can figure that an AK allowed load is how much it can carry in tons. APs are different and rather than a supply point taking up weight, it takes up volume (hence why 1 supply point takes 2 points of room on an AP, it isnt that the supplies weigh more on an AP but the way they have to stow it).
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Transport a/c capacity

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: OldGuard1970

Air transport in stock has another twist to it. The allies can airlift half-tracks and light tanks! Obviously, that is not faithful to historical capabilities. I guess it is some sort of glitch in a data-base value.

Didja know that IRL the Allies in the Pacific figured out how to torch small bulldozers and duece and a halfs in 2 and transport them on the lowly C 47?.
They would re-assemble them at their destination.
Could not depend on them having a long life, but they were there when needed.
Of course the C 46 and C 54 did not need them to be cut down.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”