CLAA Designation

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3263
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

CLAA Designation

Post by Dereck »

Is there any hard-coded attributes to the CLAA designation that one would need to be aware of before not using it for ship classes?

Thanks.
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by el cid again »

It has the attributes of a warship - and probably also a cruiser. I use it for some ships that are not exactly light cruisers - for example BBAA.
This means mainly that it can be added to most kinds of TFs and does not behave like a total wimp in combat.


User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4764
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by n01487477 »

Nemo's EA mod has quite a few available for the IJN as well ... thank goodness!

2 main types the Samurai Class only has 15 durability and 538AA, 4ASW, while the Nemo class 75 and 1616AA...

They are both really useful for CV & SC protection.

I don't see any attributes that make them problematic on the design side

User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by Nemo121 »

As far as I can see the CLAA attribution may give them a bonus to AA defence but doesn't seem to cripple them in surface combat. As such it works as one would expect.
 
The one thing I'd say is that just because the designation is CLAA doesn't preclude one from applying it do DD-sized or even BB-sized vessels.
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by el cid again »

Nemo is correct. I have reclassified a US ex BB which is a gunnery training ship as a CLAA - and a number of other vessels - and they work fine. The training ship starts with guns disabled - she doesn't have a proper crew and is not manned when the war begins - preventing her from being effective until repaired up. In a similar way another BB converts from decoy ship to CLAA - both historical roles - although as a BBAA she has very few AA guns for her size. This was a World War I ship with good engines used in three different roles during WWII - HMS Centurian - first a duplicate HMS Anson for deception purposes (this works too) - then a AA defense ship - finally a self propelled breakwater at Normandy.
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3263
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by Dereck »

Thanks for this information but I was really wondering if there was any special characteristics the game had hard-coded into the CLAA designation like it does with certain database slots (such as slot 1618 for the US A-Bomb squadron).

I'm going to make the assumption there isn't so I've removed it from my ship designations.
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8251
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by jwilkerson »

Nah nothing special, and if there was this would apply to AI created TFs. There are plenty of rules for such and even more in AE. But CLAA is not treated differently for such. And BTW, IIRC, the CLAA desgination was actually not used until the post war period! So if we want to be purists, we should not have such, at least not in the USN!
[:)]
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3263
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by Dereck »

Actually the earliest date I found referencing the CLAA classification was 28 March 1948.

Thanks
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8251
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by jwilkerson »

Well, you made me go look. So this link looks useful, I think I'd stumbled over it before. Also note that "CVE" should only be used sparingly!

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/index_ships_list.htm
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by Shark7 »

Interesting to note in there that the BC- Battlecruiser designation does not exist in that form, rather as a CC- Battlecruiser.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by el cid again »

Well - in USN the things we usually call "battlecruisers" in WWII were officially CB -

but in the 1920s - the things we were building (that got turned into Lex and Sara) really were battlecruisers.

And - for those who want to outdo the Japanese BB wise - there was a monsterous design for an 80,000 ton ship - with eighteen inch guns - not in WWII - but WWI. The only limit on the design was it had to pass the Panama Canal. If memory serves - these were twin 18s - in four mountings. The only foreign contemporary with eighteens was HMS Furious - designed with two singles - built with only one - and that was wholly impractical (bursting rivets when fired). The same thing happened to the Yamato class - which could not salvo fire - and likely would have also been a problem for the US design. There is such a thing as too big.
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: CLAA Designation

Post by RevRick »

IIRC, there was also a mega-maniacal idea for a project out there for a five triple turreted 18" gun ship. I don't think it got much beyond the "Hey, let's make a line drawing of this" stage, but someone in BuShips at least thought of it. Don't know how fast it would have been, but you would definitely have to pay attention if it showed up.
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”