Ok you know there's a problem....

John Tiller's Campaign Series exemplifies tactical war-gaming at its finest by bringing you the entire collection of TalonSoft's award-winning campaign series. Containing TalonSoft's West Front, East Front, and Rising Sun platoon-level combat series, as well as all of the official add-ons and expansion packs, the Matrix Edition allows players to dictate the events of World War II from the tumultuous beginning to its climatic conclusion. We are working together with original programmer John Tiller to bring you this updated edition.

Moderators: Jason Petho, Peter Fisla, asiaticus, dogovich

Post Reply
User avatar
V22 Osprey
Posts: 1593
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Corona, CA

Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by V22 Osprey »

when an M4A1 platoon takes out a Panzer IVH platoon in 1 shot twice in a row.[X(]

I was just playing the Bootcamp 3 in West Front, happy to have the 2 tank platoons since my Major(Commander) and a rifle platoon on hill 121 had spotted the enemy tanks.I move in position and my tanks get wiped out in 1 turn.[8|]

If it was a M4 with a 76mm I could understand, but an M4A1 with that crappy little gun.....psh.....

Please tell me this is a bug as I was showing my cousin how to play...and that made me look pretty darn stupid.[:@]
ImageImage
Art by rogueusmc.
User avatar
Arkady
Posts: 1261
Joined: Fri May 31, 2002 1:37 pm
Location: 27th Penal Battalion
Contact:

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by Arkady »

I don't understand why people blame their own poor strategy and tactic mistakes to software  bugs [8D]

situation description, please :
- distance
- facing
- elevation
- enemy platoon strength
Image
User avatar
countblue
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Vienna,Austria

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by countblue »

Bear in mind:
The Mark IV isnt that good a tank in terms of armor, sidehits and hits to the back could be lethal even with an 5cm.

Solution:
I recommend replaying the turn a couple of times and draw a statistic over the different outcomes.
If the statistics show this outcome you had as a "spike" its ok, but if this is regular AKA the "average" its somehow flabbergasting. ;-)

You know the "lucky" hit and all that.

my .02
CB
User avatar
e_barkmann
Posts: 1292
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by e_barkmann »

and of course the reverse situation is rarely spoken about as a problem - ie when your tanks overwhelm a superior enemy force - that's always put down to the fighting spirit of your men and your generalship :-)

cheers
Scourge of War multiplayer group

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/sowwaterloo
User avatar
V22 Osprey
Posts: 1593
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Corona, CA

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by V22 Osprey »

Situation:
1 platoon was 4 hexes away in a village hex.
2nd platoon was 1 hex away in the forest.
As a full-time 2d view player I don't have armor facing on.
ImageImage
Art by rogueusmc.
GHQ
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:05 pm

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by GHQ »

A long way from invincible the MkIV and it doesn't necessarily mean they've it's been destroyed, the wreck represents just put out of action.
That's something the 75mm was quite capable of doing
Many tanks were recoverable and repairable depending on who owned the battlefield in at the end of the encounter.
PaladinSix
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:29 pm

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by PaladinSix »

Many tanks were recoverable and repairable depending on who owned the battlefield in at the end of the encounter.

And that's an important point which the game engine does not reflect, which makes armor losses particularly frustrating in a campaign game.

Paladinsix
User avatar
simovitch
Posts: 5900
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 7:01 pm

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by simovitch »

ORIGINAL: PaladinSix

Many tanks were recoverable and repairable depending on who owned the battlefield in at the end of the encounter.

And that's an important point which the game engine does not reflect, which makes armor losses particularly frustrating in a campaign game.

Paladinsix
This, and other features (like penalties to the AI forces for losing missions, and manual force selection) can be accomplished if someone with programming experience would just sit down and look at the data structure of the Dynamic Campaign Game. Unfortunately I have niether the time or programming abilities to do such a thing. It took a lot of effort to develop the Creating and Modifying a DCG.pdf document, but no one seems to be doing anything with it.
simovitch

User avatar
junk2drive
Posts: 12856
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Arizona West Coast

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by junk2drive »

Actually I read your pdf. Thanks for doing it. I'm still pondering what to do and was going to post some questions after trying a couple of things first. I need to finish my current DCG first so that I don't overwrite my save files.
Conflict of Heroes "Most games are like checkers or chess and some have dice and cards involved too. This game plays like checkers but you think like chess and the dice and cards can change everything in real time."
umbro
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:02 am
Contact:

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by umbro »

ORIGINAL: V22 Osprey
when an M4A1 platoon takes out a Panzer IVH platoon in 1 shot twice in a row.[X(]


1. The PzIVH platoons in this scenario have only 1 vehicle in them. The M4A1 platoon has 3 tanks in it.
2. The first shot at 4 hexes is 3(SPs) @ 14 (atkstr at 4 hexes vs. Hard) : 7 (MkIV def str) [assuming no terrain)
The attacker has a 38% chance of inflicting at least one SP loss and therefore destroying the platoon.
3. The second shot is 3 @ 18 : 7 and has a similar chance of inflicting one SP loss (~39%)

Thus the chance of two shots taking out two PzIVHs in two different platoons is ~15% Lucky, but hardly extra-ordinary.

umbro
User avatar
V22 Osprey
Posts: 1593
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Corona, CA

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by V22 Osprey »

''The PzIVH platoons in this scenario have only 1 vehicle in them.''
-umbro
 
Oh, duh.That explains it.My bad.
ImageImage
Art by rogueusmc.
User avatar
Arkady
Posts: 1261
Joined: Fri May 31, 2002 1:37 pm
Location: 27th Penal Battalion
Contact:

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by Arkady »

ORIGINAL: simovitch

ORIGINAL: PaladinSix

Many tanks were recoverable and repairable depending on who owned the battlefield in at the end of the encounter.

And that's an important point which the game engine does not reflect, which makes armor losses particularly frustrating in a campaign game.

Paladinsix
This, and other features (like penalties to the AI forces for losing missions, and manual force selection) can be accomplished if someone with programming experience would just sit down and look at the data structure of the Dynamic Campaign Game. Unfortunately I have niether the time or programming abilities to do such a thing. It took a lot of effort to develop the Creating and Modifying a DCG.pdf document, but no one seems to be doing anything with it.

I have the skills but I do not have the time [:(]
I've idea and few notes about "Campaign Track", something similar to Steel Panther's Megacampaign or campaign games in HPS Napoleonic Wars with strategic decisions, repairs and reinforcements etc.
Unfortunately no time to do it now, I want finish my CS Army mod first before I start anything new. My current time plan is 3 month at least to finish the mod.
Image
User avatar
Warhorse
Posts: 5373
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Contact:

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by Warhorse »

Richard, I've read your PDF front to rear many, many times, and am constantly tinkering with it, just not enough time to post here on what I'm doing! I have a DCG with my K'talian mod going, and one with a WW1 mod going in WF, as well as a few others. Your work was definitely not for nothing guy, I really appreciate what you did, I always play DCG's more than anything else, they are fascinating!!

Mike
Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com
Borst50
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:00 pm

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by Borst50 »

I have to side with Mike on this one....I for another, definetely appreciate what you have done. If it wasnt for you and your advice, I dont think I could have figured out how to manipulate OOB's that i am able to now.

Three cheers, Rich....you earned it!

Tom
User avatar
auHobbes37
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:32 am

RE: Ok you know there's a problem....

Post by auHobbes37 »

ORIGINAL: simovitch

ORIGINAL: PaladinSix

Many tanks were recoverable and repairable depending on who owned the battlefield in at the end of the encounter.

And that's an important point which the game engine does not reflect, which makes armor losses particularly frustrating in a campaign game.

Paladinsix
This, and other features (like penalties to the AI forces for losing missions, and manual force selection) can be accomplished if someone with programming experience would just sit down and look at the data structure of the Dynamic Campaign Game. Unfortunately I have niether the time or programming abilities to do such a thing. It took a lot of effort to develop the Creating and Modifying a DCG.pdf document, but no one seems to be doing anything with it.

Well the game is on its way to my house... my 4 year old "bought" JTCS for my birthday. One of the reasons I am finally upgrading from the old TS WF/EF/RS is to get your DCG.pdf. It was s elling
Post Reply

Return to “John Tiller's Campaign Series”