Nuts 'n Bolts Questions

Kharkov: Disaster on the Donets is the latest strategy title from the award-winning team at Strategic Studies Group. A synthesis of the very best elements of two critically acclaimed and top-rated game systems, Decisive Battles and Battlefront, and a successor to both, the new Kharkov: Disaster on the Donets brings to life a campaign of epic scale and dynamic battles on the Eastern Front of World War II.
oldspec4
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:34 pm

RE: Nuts 'n Bolts Questions

Post by oldspec4 »

ORIGINAL: JSS

ORIGINAL: oldspec4

Believe that the new scenario is only PBEM tho [:(]

For now at least. Have to build the scenario guts before AI can be put in place. Once scenario is PBEM capable, its ready to have the AI built... just the next phase in the process.

That's good news..
User avatar
Gregor_SSG
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:22 am
Contact:

RE: Nuts 'n Bolts Questions

Post by Gregor_SSG »

ORIGINAL: hank

I heard when I first got the game that soviet units could not hedgehog.

But, my curiosity is getting to me:  What thought process went into the decision to not allow soviet units to hedgehog? 

Is it an equipment issue?  A quality issue?  ...

I'll say from experience, if you hedgehog a high quality Axis unit and place an AT unit and another couple of 4 step units of about any quality in the hex; no mix or number of soviet units will crack it.  

The last pbem I had, my opponent had a hedgehogged hex (just east of Kharkhov) .. surrounded for 3/4 of the game and regardless of the mix and number of the highest quality units I could muster, I could not get odds sufficient for the game to allow me to roll the dice.  ... supply wasn't even an issue.  I guess maybe it was because it was only 3 hexes or so from its own front lines (maybe?? ... I don't know).

Hedgehogging is a question of equipment, unit quality, command capability and doctrine. Lets look at the reasons why a Soviet unit cannot hedgehog:

Soviet infantry formations were not well equipped as combined arms formations, Soviet practice was to attach independent AT, armour, artillery etc. This was OK if you happened to have those attached, obviously not so good if you didn't.

The question of unit quality is fairly obvious. At the time of the Kharkov battle the Red Army had suffered massive losses and was engaged in a desperate scramble to train and equip new formations. The rushed training of Soviet conscripts could not compare with the training and combat experience of German units.

Even if supporting arms formations were attached, the Soviet command structure struggled to integrate them properly, and they usually didn't deliver the same combat power that a similarly equipped German unit would have done. Soviet commanders never approached the ability of their German counterparts to weld together miscellaneous units into a coherent whole.

Obviously, a formation trapped behind enemy lines is going to have to rely on its own initiative to preserve it against enemy attacks, especially in the Red Army with its unreliable and insecure radio communications. In the Red Army 'initiative' was an unword for commanders. Doing nothing because you had no orders, or continuing to execute old orders, no matter how unrealistic, might get you killed by the Germans. Acting without orders would allow any commanders within about 100 miles to transfer the blame for any problems,(and there were always problems), directly to you, with guaranteed negative outcomes for your career and possibly life.

So you can see how a variety of factors combine to make it impossible, in game terms, for Soviet units to hedgehog.

Gregor
Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.
RAL
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:12 am

RE: Nuts 'n Bolts Questions

Post by RAL »

Just in case it wasn't clear I wasn't complaining about hedgehogs at all, just trying to figure out why I couldn't make one in this scenario with the Soviets.

In fact I've got no complaints at all about this game, and I've been playing wargames since Avalon Hill's Afrika Korps.
hank
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 8:50 am
Location: west tn

RE: Nuts 'n Bolts Questions

Post by hank »

Thanks for the reply G.  I'm not complaining either, I was just curious why.  The big Why question.
 
I can see the logic behind the decision now.  Those Germans were some inovative and adaptive combatants.
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15786
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: Nuts 'n Bolts Questions

Post by Helpless »

That's very understandable why Soviet could not hedgehoging.. but I found current implementation of German capabilities to be inaccurate. There was a thread started by me some time ago, which end up with excellent Chris's lesson how to reduce them [:)] tm.asp?m=1967314

But beside this quite minor note, I think that gaming system is very balanced (with exceptions of some AO setups ) and very very entertaining (with no exceptions). [:)] I'm very excited with new screenshots!!
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development
Post Reply

Return to “Kharkov: Disaster on the Donets”