Russian capital(s)

Empires in Arms is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. Empires in Arms is a seven player game of grand strategy set during the Napoleonic period of 1805-1815. The unit scale is corps level with full diplomatic options

Moderator: MOD_EIA

Post Reply
User avatar
Marshall Ellis
Posts: 5630
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

Russian capital(s)

Post by Marshall Ellis »

Hey guys:

I am adding the second capital to Russia (St Pete's).
Russia will have 2 capitals (St Pete's and Moscow).
Enemy unbesieged occupation of EITHER of these will cause Russia to collect no money.
Russia will also lose 1pp for each capital that is occupied by unbesieged enemy.
Karelia will NOT be eligible to be selected for ceding now that it is a capital.
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


bOrIuM
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:50 am

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by bOrIuM »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

Enemy unbesieged occupation of EITHER of these will cause Russia to collect no money.

Isnt both capitals to be occupied to collect no money ? We always played like that. Its one of the advantage of Russia. Even if Napoleon occupied Moscow, it still received their money.
NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by NeverMan »

8.2.1.1 MONEY COLLECTION BY TAXATION: The tax money due a major power is determined by adding together all of the tax values of all of its controlled home provinces, currently ceded enemy provinces and conquered minor countries. The tax money due a controlled minor free state is similarly and separately figured (see 8.2.3). A major power may not collect taxes from a province or minor country if its capital city is occupied by unbesieged enemy factors. A major power collects no taxes at all (except for its minor free states) if its national capital city (or, in the case of Russia, if either Moscow or St. Petersburg) is occupied by unbesieged enemy factors.
pzgndr
Posts: 3704
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:51 am
Location: Delaware

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by pzgndr »

Here's original EiA rule (with errata?):
8.2.1.1 MONEY COILLECTION BY TAXATION: The tax money due a major power is determined by adding together all of the tax values of all of its controlled home provinces, currently ceded enemy provinces and conquered minor countries. The tax money due a controlled minor free state is similarly and separately figured (see 8.2.3). A major power may not collect taxes from a province or minor country if its capital city is occupied by unbesieged enemy factors. A major power collects no taxes at all (except for its minor free states) if its national capital city (or, in the case of Russia, if either Moscow or St. Petersburg) is occupied by unbesieged enemy factors.

Should EiANW be different?


Edit. Shucks, NeverMan beat me by 35 seconds. [:D]
Bill Macon
Empires in Arms Developer
Strategic Command Developer
User avatar
Marshall Ellis
Posts: 5630
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by Marshall Ellis »

I'll go out on a limb and say that EiANW shouldn't be different here, yea? :-)
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


User avatar
borner
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by borner »

Having that Capital on the coast is one of the few things that cause russia to be careful. If all you have is Moscow to worry about, well, you are pretty darn secure.
User avatar
Marshall Ellis
Posts: 5630
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by Marshall Ellis »

Correct. It is clear that the designers recognized this.
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


iamspamus
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by iamspamus »

COR-RECT!
ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

I'll go out on a limb and say that EiANW shouldn't be different here, yea? :-)

iamspamus
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by iamspamus »

Of course, this doesn't matter if you have good allies, who are funding you. There's nothing more frustrating than taking the dudes capital and having his "allies" fund him while he takes it back...sigh...

ORIGINAL: NeverMan

8.2.1.1 MONEY COLLECTION BY TAXATION: The tax money due a major power is determined by adding together all of the tax values of all of its controlled home provinces, currently ceded enemy provinces and conquered minor countries. The tax money due a controlled minor free state is similarly and separately figured (see 8.2.3). A major power may not collect taxes from a province or minor country if its capital city is occupied by unbesieged enemy factors. A major power collects no taxes at all (except for its minor free states) if its national capital city (or, in the case of Russia, if either Moscow or St. Petersburg) is occupied by unbesieged enemy factors.
NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by NeverMan »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

I'll go out on a limb and say that EiANW shouldn't be different here, yea? :-)


I'll go out on a limb and say that EiANW shouldn't be different anywhere, yeah? :-)
User avatar
borner
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by borner »

Tater
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 7:06 pm

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by Tater »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

Hey guys:

I am adding the second capital to Russia (St Pete's).
Russia will have 2 capitals (St Pete's and Moscow).
Enemy unbesieged occupation of EITHER of these will cause Russia to collect no money.
Russia will also lose 1pp for each capital that is occupied by unbesieged enemy.
Karelia will NOT be eligible to be selected for ceding now that it is a capital.

So, I take it that it is not that way now?
Later-

Tater
User avatar
Marshall Ellis
Posts: 5630
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by Marshall Ellis »

Correct. Today Moscow is the only capital.
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


User avatar
borner
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by borner »

Makes it more fun playing Russia though!!!! 
iamspamus
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by iamspamus »

Nah, it just makes it easier. It's more "fun" to play Russia where you have to protect St. Pete also! I actually loved it when the N Baltic froze over for winter. I could breathe a sigh of relief!
ORIGINAL: borner

Makes it more fun playing Russia though!!!! 
NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by NeverMan »

ORIGINAL: iamspamus

Nah, it just makes it easier. It's more "fun" to play Russia where you have to protect St. Pete also! I actually loved it when the N Baltic froze over for winter. I could breathe a sigh of relief!
ORIGINAL: borner

Makes it more fun playing Russia though!!!! 


I think that's what he meant.
User avatar
borner
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by borner »

yup 
iamspamus
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by iamspamus »

I know... Uh, I was just giving ol' borner crap... [8|]
ORIGINAL: NeverMan

ORIGINAL: iamspamus

Nah, it just makes it easier. It's more "fun" to play Russia where you have to protect St. Pete also! I actually loved it when the N Baltic froze over for winter. I could breathe a sigh of relief!
ORIGINAL: borner

Makes it more fun playing Russia though!!!! 


I think that's what he meant.
NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: Russian capital(s)

Post by NeverMan »

ORIGINAL: iamspamus

I know... Uh, I was just giving ol' borner crap... [8|]
ORIGINAL: NeverMan

ORIGINAL: iamspamus

Nah, it just makes it easier. It's more "fun" to play Russia where you have to protect St. Pete also! I actually loved it when the N Baltic froze over for winter. I could breathe a sigh of relief!




I think that's what he meant.

OK. [:D][;)][:@][:'(][:o][:-][&o][8|][X(][>:][:(][&:][8D][:)]
Post Reply

Return to “Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815”