two Germans in the Pacific - Sc17

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: next Allied move?

Post by RGIJN »

not much action today, aside from some flopped night bombing by Betties and Helens and the daily recon ops. Not even my petty barges came under fire last turn. And the day before six or seven of them sunk from these damn patrol bombers... [:@]

The transport bug continues to upset me. Really annoying thing to give orders to load "Unit XYZ" but some doofus at the pier (or wherever this moron resides) determines "Unit 123" to get onboard instead. Or no one at all.
One of the key tactics in my defensive system is to be as flexible and as quick as possible under the given circumstances. But this is getting out of the window yet...
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: next Allied move?

Post by RGIJN »

Sep 9th, 1943

another IJ barge sunk after hits from patrol bombers.
Allied shipping traffic in the Western Coral Sea undaunted.
No Air Action (at day).
DDs trying to resume FT operations. Very curious if it works now.
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

barge war

Post by RGIJN »

have not counted the killed barges so far yet, but I guess the losses must be about 50...80. Wondering if I am going to run out of these moderately helpful vessels when all from the database (about 100 or so) are lost then or if they will revive after some time?!?

these sort of losses are no wonder to me, considering how exposed these tiny nutshells operate most of the time...



Image
Attachments
B25shippingattacks.jpg
B25shippingattacks.jpg (69.39 KiB) Viewed 228 times
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: barge war

Post by RGIJN »

So may be I should keep them sheltered in tunnels (as historcal) and they won´t sink down to the bottom. Instead, they will just rust away after some decades...[;)][8|]



Image

(actual picture taken at Rabaul...)
Attachments
barge_wrecktunnel.jpg
barge_wrecktunnel.jpg (21.17 KiB) Viewed 228 times
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

110 days short of the End

Post by RGIJN »

[font="Trebuchet MS"]Hey folks - turn 500 is done by now![/font]

[font="Trebuchet MS"]Only a few more than hundred days and we´re at the end of this truly great game we both germans having here in the Pacific! [:)][;)][/font]

But unfortunately, there is no much reason to celebrate. Not so because of the real war happenings but because of the strange "surprises" built into this game...!
Will post some details of the bugs we´re encountering lately in the forums "Tech Support" section. [:(][:@][X(]

Aside from this, MY own (IJA) patrol bombers finally hit some target... the first US barge was sunk![:)]



Image
Attachments
LCM_Helenhit.jpg
LCM_Helenhit.jpg (7.38 KiB) Viewed 228 times
User avatar
borner
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

RE: 110 days short of the End

Post by borner »

my personal favorite is waiting on the last two Nell sqd's to arrive at Truk, and they are empty instead of having 18 bombers each. So much for late game reinforcements. 
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: 110 days short of the End

Post by RGIJN »

ORIGINAL: borner

my personal favorite is waiting on the last two Nell sqd's to arrive at Truk, and they are empty instead of having 18 bombers each. So much for late game reinforcements. 

Which G3M squads do you mean in particular? I never got an empty Nell unit (originally), but I agree their supply is ridicoulous. Same as for many other Types. So it happens that if you disband say a Nell unit of course they will return empty and it takes a long time to "fill up" even up to 6 A/C (two months at least!). Actually, I never had a full strength G3M Daitai with all it´s 27 planes. I think it´s impossible to gain.

Though it´s very hard for the japanese player to get along with such reinforcement rates, IMHO it´s pretty historical. After the 1942 hightide (especially in autumn 42 the japanese pumped a lot of A/C into the Solomons theathre) there came a steep fall down into the agony of late 1943. Had the four airdromes at Rabaul always up to 250...400 A/C from late 42 to Oct. 43, the Imperial High Command had to abandon this great airbase in steps from Nov. 1943 to mid-February 1944 when the last servicable wrecks were withdrawn to Truk (after the disaster there). Countless numbers of planes and -above all- the last surviving pilot cracks were lost to nothing achieved with this sacrifice. They even sent to the slaughter the CV Airgroups, which returned quite depleted, if at all.

User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: 110 days short of the End

Post by RGIJN »

another recon mission by paratroops at Vila, which is beeing reconnoitered some time by now.
Otherwise, some LBA tried to bomb transport convoys in the Tulagi area but failed to succeed. [8D]




AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/11/43

Weather: Clear

Sub attack at 35,38

Japanese Ships
AG 119, Shell hits 12, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Sargo


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on Hoskins , at 16,31


Allied aircraft
SBD Dauntless x 55
TBF Avenger x 9
P-40E Kittyhawk x 18
P-40E Warhawk x 18


no losses

Runway hits 3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on Nevea , at 50,43


Allied aircraft
SBD Dauntless x 45
P-39D Airacobra x 15
P-40E Kittyhawk x 24
F-5A Lightning x 2


no losses

Japanese ground losses:
Men lost 12

Port hits 3
Port supply hits 1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on TF, near Sepi at 38,38


Allied aircraft
Hudson x 6


no losses

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 24
AP Kinugasa Maru

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on TF, near Sepi at 38,38


Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 3


no losses

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 24


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Vila

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 15 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 2927 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 3)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: 110 days short of the End

Post by RGIJN »

[font="Verdana"]Oh, they have armor??? Now that´s new...[/font]

Image Anyway, not enogh to withstand the deadly projectiles of a 20mm Oerlikon!
Attachments
barge_armorhit.jpg
barge_armorhit.jpg (34.74 KiB) Viewed 228 times
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

Armoured barges

Post by xj900uk »

Didn't you know? They used to hang empty saki bottles along the side in the hope that allied shells might bounce off them
User avatar
borner
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

RE: Armoured barges

Post by borner »

The sooner you hang them on the side after you drink them empty, the better the crews thought they would work! 
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: Armoured barges

Post by xj900uk »

Funnily enough, there was a lack of feedback from barges who had been attacked & shot up, whether good or bad. In fact, I don't think there were any barges left to make feedback... [8D]
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: Armoured barges

Post by RGIJN »

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Funnily enough, there was a lack of feedback from barges who had been attacked & shot up, whether good or bad. In fact, I don't think there were any barges left to make feedback... [8D]

Oh no, I still have plenty left. But these crews in particular turned from drunken to drowned, so no other feedback available than gurgling and some little blebs that rise up from the bottom...[;)] Not to forget the countless bottles scattered in the Solomons now. And there are no letters within...[:-]

User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: Armoured barges

Post by RGIJN »

ORIGINAL: borner

The sooner you hang them on the side after you drink them empty, the better the crews thought they would work! 

the stuff might also ease the impact of the hits... making them to belive its just bad weather once more... [;)]
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

failed experiment

Post by RGIJN »

Last night I sent two DDs (separately) out into Woodlark Isl. anchorage. Large allied transport fleets are reported there. And I know that Fuelli has based (at least part of) his battle fleet at GG. The plan was to land some fishes into the bellies of any ship. I assumed he would come out since he saw my forces in the area.
You´ll think "wow, what a silly suicidal move".


I agree it certainly looks like that, but more than once it worked and sometimes I even got out without a scratch. Nomad can tell you the tale...[8D] But not so this time, unfortunately... Both DDs sacrified in vain. [:(]



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/13/43

Weather: Rain

Night Time Surface Combat at 0,0

Japanese Ships
DD Shimotsuki, Shell hits 32, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Pensacola
CA Quincy
CL Santa Fe
DD Fletcher
DD Converse
DD Foote
DD Spence
DD Thatcher
DD Claxton
DD Aulick
DD Calahan
DD Flusser
DD Farragut


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 0,0

Japanese Ships
DD Susuzuki, Shell hits 17, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Pensacola
CA Quincy, Shell hits 1
CL Santa Fe
DD Fletcher
DD Converse
DD Foote
DD Spence
DD Thatcher
DD Claxton
DD Aulick
DD Calahan
DD Flusser
DD Farragut


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: failed experiment

Post by RGIJN »

This time I got surprised and shot into pieces.

The "surprise" mechanism is quite strange built into UV anyway. The concept in general is fine, but the way it works I cannot grasp. As stated earlier from the allied POV, it lacks some reality. (A transport fleet which got heavy shooting already can´t be surprised if they face their foe for another round...)
But OK OK OK, I know - such PC games are "just" computer programmes which work straight digital supported by some dicees... [;)]

Image
Attachments
Shimotsuki_death.jpg
Shimotsuki_death.jpg (130.65 KiB) Viewed 228 times
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: failed experiment

Post by xj900uk »

Is there the chance/possibility built into the encouter tables that the fleets will miss one another? Particularly if one fleet, eg here the Japanese, is one small solitary and fast ship trying to do some 'blockade running' and doesnt' particularly want to be found
User avatar
RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: far away from battlefield :-(
Contact:

RE: failed experiment

Post by RGIJN »

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Is there the chance/possibility built into the encouter tables that the fleets will miss one another? Particularly if one fleet, eg here the Japanese, is one small solitary and fast ship trying to do some 'blockade running' and doesnt' particularly want to be found

good idea, but I don´t think so. At least I never experienced any "miss" when two opponent fleets met at one certain spot...
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: failed experiment

Post by xj900uk »

I have on a few occassions. Also, i f the captain/force commander is savy enough, he can move his force out of the way of a bigger/larger/more powerful force which has certainly happened to me (unloading transport force had enough presence of mind to undock and leg it just before the Yamato & Mutsu came around the headland)
Kingfisher
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:25 am

RE: failed experiment

Post by Kingfisher »

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Is there the chance/possibility built into the encouter tables that the fleets will miss one another? Particularly if one fleet, eg here the Japanese, is one small solitary and fast ship trying to do some 'blockade running' and doesnt' particularly want to be found

At first glance one would think not if the side that is blockading has a picket of radar equipped ships.

Then again, there was the battle of Savo Island...
"splendid was their tactic of diving upon our force from the direction of the sun, taking advantage of intermittent clouds"

-Captain Takahisa Amagai, KAGA, June 4th 1942
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”