WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: jrcar

The coders have been real busy. We have just upgraded to the new build and this additional functionality has been added. While a minor change it really improves the human machine interface. In the past you had to click into each unit to see what mode and orders the unit had. This saves a lot of time each turn!




Image

Outstanding!
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Grotius »

Yeah, I love the ability to look at ground-unit orders from the "G" screen. But what does "Pack" mean? Time spent packing for strategic movement?

Also, it looks like you can change the "Move" order from this screen, but not the "Combat" or "Target" order?
Image
Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Mistmatz »

ORIGINAL: jrcar

The coders have been real busy. We have just upgraded to the new build and this additional functionality has been added. While a minor change it really improves the human machine interface. In the past you had to click into each unit to see what mode and orders the unit had. This saves a lot of time each turn!




Image


Nice feature. Would be even better if one could give the combat orders as well and preferably also for stacks outside a base.

Of course getting the baby out would have even higher priority... [8D]

If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: Blackhorse

"Canadian Hosers"
"A Canada Bn, eh"

Both of those have my vote. Classic [:D]
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4764
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by n01487477 »


Is anyone else out there wondering how on Earth a Japanese player is supposed to build enough engines given that there seems to be about 20 Engine types ?? ... I'm fully in favour of more choices and tough decisions, but isn't is difficult enough to repair at 1000 supply/per Engine Factory (and others too including Arm/Veh/Planes etc). I do hope that someone has tested this economic model sufficiently as I have yet to see a major thread on it (thanks to jrcar for doing this much) & we all know that supply can be a real issue for Japan...

I realise that all of this can be modded anyway -- I guess we will just have to trust in the test team and hope that the Japanese are not so stymied that they cannot compete longer than the first few weeks/months of the war & I hope I am not overstating it here.

Although I have plenty of other issues with the "pacification" iirc (from threads in this forum area) of the Japanese war machine and other issues mostly related to Stock but not necessarily AE(so far as I can tell), I applaud your efforts and in good faith hope that the model will be sound, while looking forward to the added challenges this game will bring.

Once again, thanks Jcar for enlightening an enthrawled public.

User avatar
Gunner98
Posts: 5975
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:49 am
Location: The Great White North!
Contact:

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Gunner98 »

ORIGINAL: Blackhorse


[
Not a typo -- the field allows a maximum of 15 letters/spaces. We're accepting nominations for better alternative spellings:

"Rifle of Canada" (what, the battalion had but 1 rifle among them?)
"RR of Canada" (a rest and relaxation battalion?)
"Canadian Hosers"
"A Canada Bn, eh"

OK could be 'The RTR of C' Royal Touque Regt of Canada [:D]

I would abreviate Canada to 'Cda', prity much accepted I think

So 'R Rifles of Cda' (that's 15 I think)

Although 'A Cdn Bn, eh!' should work [;)]
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by khyberbill »

Is anyone else out there wondering how on Earth a Japanese player is supposed to build enough engines given that there seems to be about 20 Engine types ?? ... I'm fully in favour of more choices and tough decisions, but isn't is difficult enough to repair at 1000 supply/per Engine Factory (and others too including Arm/Veh/Planes etc). I do hope that someone has tested this economic model sufficiently as I have yet to see a major thread on it (thanks to jrcar for doing this much) & we all know that supply can be a real issue for Japan...

I realise that all of this can be modded anyway -- I guess we will just have to trust in the test team and hope that the Japanese are not so stymied that they cannot compete longer than the first few weeks/months of the war & I hope I am not overstating it here.

Although I have plenty of other issues with the "pacification" iirc (from threads in this forum area) of the Japanese war machine and other issues mostly related to Stock but not necessarily AE(so far as I can tell), I applaud your efforts and in good faith hope that the model will be sound, while looking forward to the added challenges this game will bring.

Once again, thanks Jcar for enlightening an enthrawled public.

I am not a JFB, more of a JWB (w=whipping). At the beginning of this AAR JRCAE did mention that he has played into late 1942 to check the economic part of AE for Japan. I dont have the experience to know if this is long enough. The few times I have played Japan I started running out of engines in late 42.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by khyberbill »

Not a typo -- the field allows a maximum of 15 letters/spaces. We're accepting nominations for better alternative spellings:

"Rifle of Canada" (what, the battalion had but 1 rifle among them?)
"RR of Canada" (a rest and relaxation battalion?)
"Canadian Hosers"
"A Canada Bn, eh"
The group below Rifles of Canda has 30 letters/spaces. Winnipeg Grenadiers Battalion. I am confused. Easily confused in fact.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Dili »

Battalion probably is added by game engine but it still have more than 15.
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: khyberbill
Is anyone else out there wondering how on Earth a Japanese player is supposed to build enough engines given that there seems to be about 20 Engine types ?? ... I'm fully in favour of more choices and tough decisions, but isn't is difficult enough to repair at 1000 supply/per Engine Factory (and others too including Arm/Veh/Planes etc). I do hope that someone has tested this economic model sufficiently as I have yet to see a major thread on it (thanks to jrcar for doing this much) & we all know that supply can be a real issue for Japan...

I realise that all of this can be modded anyway -- I guess we will just have to trust in the test team and hope that the Japanese are not so stymied that they cannot compete longer than the first few weeks/months of the war & I hope I am not overstating it here.

Although I have plenty of other issues with the "pacification" iirc (from threads in this forum area) of the Japanese war machine and other issues mostly related to Stock but not necessarily AE(so far as I can tell), I applaud your efforts and in good faith hope that the model will be sound, while looking forward to the added challenges this game will bring.

Once again, thanks Jcar for enlightening an enthrawled public.

I am not a JFB, more of a JWB (w=whipping). At the beginning of this AAR JRCAE did mention that he has played into late 1942 to check the economic part of AE for Japan. I dont have the experience to know if this is long enough. The few times I have played Japan I started running out of engines in late 42.

My experience in RHS is the Japanese economy goes off the rails in late 1942/early 1943. The initial cause is resources running out.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Blackhorse
We're accepting nominations for better alternative spellings:

"Rifle of Canada" (what, the battalion had but 1 rifle among them?)
"RR of Canada" (a rest and relaxation battalion?)
"Canadian Hosers"
"A Canada Bn, eh"

What about "R.Rfl.of Canada"?

I agree its a tough one!

Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Barb »

I suggest: Rofl of Canada
[:D]
No offence mapleleafs...
Image
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by jrcar »

The guys are one step a head, clicking on the yellow text "combat" cycles through the options :)

Cheers

Rob
ORIGINAL: Mistmatz

ORIGINAL: jrcar

The coders have been real busy. We have just upgraded to the new build and this additional functionality has been added. While a minor change it really improves the human machine interface. In the past you had to click into each unit to see what mode and orders the unit had. This saves a lot of time each turn!




Image


Nice feature. Would be even better if one could give the combat orders as well and preferably also for stacks outside a base.

Of course getting the baby out would have even higher priority... [8D]

AE BETA Breaker
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by jrcar »

Yes this is still an issue and not completely tested... I guess we will know in about 18 months time when people get there! It can't be fully tested.

Just as IRL the Japanese command don't know that increasing in one area will restrict operations elsewhere. As the Japanese player you need to be spending as much effort on the ecomomy (monitoring usage and stockpiles) as you do on the operations. You have a number of management options open to you, just like they did IRL.

The fantasy of PACWAR and stock that allows the Japanese to advance faster and do more than was realisticly possible I think is (almost) gone. Also the fantasy that saw Allied players doing unrealistic things in 43 and 44 has also (almost) gone. You have less units (thanks to the new withdrawel rules) compared to stock.

IMHO I think this combined will make the game MORE enjoyable to both sides. In Stock it is fun for the Japanese player until about Jul/Aug 42. Fun for both players from Jul/Aug 42 to about Jan/Feb 43 then generally unfun for the Japanese player from mid 43 onwards (frustration from just being overrun by numbers and capability).

Now I think the balance point will come forward a little bit, and extend until the end of 43 (guess, no real facts). 44 onwards will still be hard (ie frsutrating) on the Japanese player (just as it was in real life).

Of course this is predicated on my style of gaming where the "fun factor" is in having a credible challange (hence I don't play the AI!). I don't find it fun crushing (or being crushed by) my game opponants, I guess I get to do that IRL :)

Now if you wnat the economy fully tested then set the relase date back another 12 months... I don't think ANYONE wants that :) At the moment it looks OK, but is being refined, I expect right up until release.

Cheers

Rob


ORIGINAL: herwin

ORIGINAL: khyberbill
Is anyone else out there wondering how on Earth a Japanese player is supposed to build enough engines given that there seems to be about 20 Engine types ?? ... I'm fully in favour of more choices and tough decisions, but isn't is difficult enough to repair at 1000 supply/per Engine Factory (and others too including Arm/Veh/Planes etc). I do hope that someone has tested this economic model sufficiently as I have yet to see a major thread on it (thanks to jrcar for doing this much) & we all know that supply can be a real issue for Japan...

I realise that all of this can be modded anyway -- I guess we will just have to trust in the test team and hope that the Japanese are not so stymied that they cannot compete longer than the first few weeks/months of the war & I hope I am not overstating it here.

Although I have plenty of other issues with the "pacification" iirc (from threads in this forum area) of the Japanese war machine and other issues mostly related to Stock but not necessarily AE(so far as I can tell), I applaud your efforts and in good faith hope that the model will be sound, while looking forward to the added challenges this game will bring.

Once again, thanks Jcar for enlightening an enthrawled public.

I am not a JFB, more of a JWB (w=whipping). At the beginning of this AAR JRCAE did mention that he has played into late 1942 to check the economic part of AE for Japan. I dont have the experience to know if this is long enough. The few times I have played Japan I started running out of engines in late 42.

My experience in RHS is the Japanese economy goes off the rails in late 1942/early 1943. The initial cause is resources running out.
AE BETA Breaker
User avatar
Blackhorse
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Eastern US

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Blackhorse »

ORIGINAL: khyberbill
Not a typo -- the field allows a maximum of 15 letters/spaces. We're accepting nominations for better alternative spellings:

"Rifle of Canada" (what, the battalion had but 1 rifle among them?)
"RR of Canada" (a rest and relaxation battalion?)
"Canadian Hosers"
"A Canada Bn, eh"
The group below Rifles of Canda has 30 letters/spaces. Winnipeg Grenadiers Battalion. I am confused. Easily confused in fact.

Extensive playtesting has revealed that we can now use 19 letters/spaces per unit (suffixes, like "Battalion" are in addition). The bad news is that the extensive playtesting has pushed back the release date another 6 months.

But when AE comes out, "Rifles of Canada" at least, will be possible!
WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!
bradfordkay
Posts: 8686
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by bradfordkay »

"Now if you want the economy fully tested then set the release date back another 12 months..." 

I would say more like 36 months to fully test it!

If 19 spaces:
Royl Rfls of Canada
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by witpqs »

I vote for "DemNorthGuys"
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by m10bob »

I kinda like..."HOSERS DOWN THE HALL"..
Image

User avatar
kmussler
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 11:15 pm
Location: Rensselaer, Indiana, USA

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by kmussler »

Sorry, m10bob, but that's 20 spaces.....[:D]
User avatar
Gunner98
Posts: 5975
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:49 am
Location: The Great White North!
Contact:

RE: WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

Post by Gunner98 »

How about the 'RLTG'  Royal Lumberjack territorial Guards!![:D]
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”