Hearts of Iron Preview

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

Post Reply
User avatar
Zakhal
Posts: 1407
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Hearts of Iron Preview

Post by Zakhal »

here
GS: Any fears that you'll encounter WWII burnout? A lot of games based on the war have come out over the past few years, in all genres, and there's a sense that some gamers are a little tired of it all.

JA: I don't think that is the case, as there have not been any grand strategic games on the World War II era for almost a decade. Of course, games such as Sudden Strike and Return to Wolfenstein have been in this flavor, but there have not been any strategic games recently released. The last grand strategy game set during the Second World War was Clash of Steel, released almost 10 years ago.
Lol!
"99.9% of all internet arguments are due to people not understanding someone else's point. The other 0.1% is arguing over made up statistics."- unknown poster
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

Post by U2 »

Hi

Another grand strategic wargame coming out (tomorrow) is Battlefront's Strategic Command. It looks just like Clash of Steel and will be sold for 25$
But Hearts of Iron looks really good too and its by a Swedish company!:)
Dan
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

God with a name like Hearts of Iron I hope it does well, but that name blows for a title of a grand strategy wargame.

Sounds like a movie you take your girlfriend to see. What were they thinking when they named it.

Nice to see those sort wargames are still being released. Truth be known, I would rather a no AI actual opponent required pure copy of an old board game classic like Advanced Third Reich be made instead myself.

Even with the limitations of card board counters and all, I have a better time playing board games solo if need be, then I do against the latest wargame, when all I have to look forward to, is a great let down from a lame AI.

And if all a computer wargame is, is an electronic attempt to be a board game that I have to play solo, well why buy it, I already have great board games that I can play solo.

And I am not entirely sold on online gaming being a good reason to champion computer games.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
Vincent Prochelo
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cimmeria
Contact:

Post by Vincent Prochelo »

Hmmm... they mention Roosevelt and von Ribbentrop, but no mention of Hitler...

Wonder if he will be portrayed as "Head of State"?

If not, does anyone know if this kind of thing can be modded?

Game looks GREAT!

-V
"It is as it is."

-Edward III
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

Hmmm almost missed that "here" button that takes you to a blurb of the game.

Vincent what I saw of the site shows that you will have Hitler Ribbentrop and several other key Germany personalities if you are running the German side actually.

Game uses a region location mapboard instead of the more common hexes, but that isn't a negative automatically.

Game looks like it has potential to interest even me. But my first instant reaction was Axis n Allies with greatly magnified spaces. Now if the game is as dumb as the computer AI in Axis n Allies, save your money people. As Axis n Allies is only fun when you have five people playiong the sides.
No amount of cute graphics and nifty sounds will make a game that is brain dead, fun to play in the end.

And that is the bottom line.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

Hmmm one last comment, The description at the site has an obvious error in that it obviously made the mistake of calling Roosevelt a minister. That is obviously a proofreading goof up on the article.
Ribbentrop was a minister, Hitler would be a head of state. And obviously Roosevelt would be a head of state as well.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”