The "Actual" Greatest War Movie ever
Moderator: MOD_SPWaW
- Belisarius
- Posts: 3099
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Come on the M1A2 is still the best tank, too bad the US Army thinks tanks are outdated.
"History admires the wise, but it elevates the brave."
-Edmund Morris

[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbar ... tual-b-o-b
-Edmund Morris

[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbar ... tual-b-o-b
Hey, don´t get carried away. This thread is named "The "Actual" Greatest War Movie ever", not "The best modern MBT".Originally posted by Hades
Come on the M1A2 is still the best tank, too bad the US Army thinks tanks are outdated.
"Man shouldn't have to live on carbohydrates alone, complex or otherwise." -Spike.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 4:03 am
- Location: At the base of the worlds largest flat top mountai
Greetings...
Pork Chop Hill. The Only war movie that isn't full of cliche, M48's pretending to be tigers, completely historicaly correct, and faithfully recreates an actual battle and it's conditions. I hate war movies that spend 90 minutes out of 120 trying to get you to feel the emotional pain of some poor slob you really don't give a hoot about, then make it seem so tramatic to them that "Oh my god! I'm actually here in the middle of a war! Oh Boo Hoo!!" Ugh... Black Hawk Downer (technicly it's not really the name of a movie:p ) was so insipidly Liberal! I was ashamed to watch it! If that's the way US rangers fight now, God help us all...
That's why Pork chop hill is the best. Greg Peck is tough as nails and never lets you forget it. BooYaW! 98 minutes of non-stop Intelligent action. Where the drama is intense not because of a good background score, but because the situation IS intense. No big special effects, just superb acting that displays every situation from cowerdice to Gallantry and every range in between.
Kanda'
Pork Chop Hill. The Only war movie that isn't full of cliche, M48's pretending to be tigers, completely historicaly correct, and faithfully recreates an actual battle and it's conditions. I hate war movies that spend 90 minutes out of 120 trying to get you to feel the emotional pain of some poor slob you really don't give a hoot about, then make it seem so tramatic to them that "Oh my god! I'm actually here in the middle of a war! Oh Boo Hoo!!" Ugh... Black Hawk Downer (technicly it's not really the name of a movie:p ) was so insipidly Liberal! I was ashamed to watch it! If that's the way US rangers fight now, God help us all...
That's why Pork chop hill is the best. Greg Peck is tough as nails and never lets you forget it. BooYaW! 98 minutes of non-stop Intelligent action. Where the drama is intense not because of a good background score, but because the situation IS intense. No big special effects, just superb acting that displays every situation from cowerdice to Gallantry and every range in between.
Kanda'
Give a man a torch and he burns for a day, set a man on fire and he burns for the rest of his life! Bombers at 12 oclock HIGH!
-
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 2:20 am
- Location: Odessa, Ukraine
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 2:20 am
- Location: Odessa, Ukraine
Originally posted by JonnieWalker
At first months of the war , yes. But not in late 42. Russian troops had enougf rifles and ammo to ( in difference to artillery which tested sharp shortage of an ammunition ) equip every soldier.
I doubt that my grandfa would survived without rifle or bullets in Stalingrad![]()
Actually they didnt have rifles for all in Stalingrad and that is a fact from Anthony Beevors Book Stalingrad...happens to be a best book written about battles of Stalingrad this far IMO, so i kinda believe it if cant see other proves

"You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
Yes, i agree with that language thing, but not many movies have Germans that really speak Germany and same goes to Russians...Except that i think it didnt kill movie because great actors and sfx...Originally posted by ananias
Yeah, Enemy at the gates would be on my top-3 too, if only the characters would speak russian and german, instead of english. To me that totally killed the movie.
Well, Das Boot have one and Stalingrad have one..cant remember much more...but even a right language speaking didnt save Stalingrad from bad actors..but thats only my opinion of course

"You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 2:20 am
- Location: Odessa, Ukraine
I´ve seen a russian war film, and it was quite good. It told the story of a group of russian soldiers stationed in a remonted outpost. They were constanly bugged by a lone sniper who, however, didn´t kill any of the soldiers until the very end of the movie. There was a good reason for that, but I think I´ll leave the details out.
There wasn´t much fighting in the film but that didn´t bother me. Too bad I can´t remeber the name of the film....
Btw, my favorite russian film is "Brother".

There wasn´t much fighting in the film but that didn´t bother me. Too bad I can´t remeber the name of the film....
Btw, my favorite russian film is "Brother".
"Man shouldn't have to live on carbohydrates alone, complex or otherwise." -Spike.