WWIII

Post here to meet players for MP games and generally engage in ribbing and banter about your prowess.

Moderator: Vic

autarkis1967
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:00 am

RE: WWIII

Post by autarkis1967 »

US is fine with me.
Tufkal2
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:50 pm
Location: Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by Tufkal2 »

Ok we are all set.
@Autarkis1967: Can you please send me your e-mail so I can send you the turn please?
You will then nedd Rufus' email.
Thanks.
autarkis1967
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:00 am

RE: WWIII

Post by autarkis1967 »

Rufus still need your email to send turn to.
Tufkal2
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:50 pm
Location: Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by Tufkal2 »

Turn 2 to USA...
RufusTFirefly
Posts: 951
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Dortmund, Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by RufusTFirefly »

Hello guys,
 
hatemf90 has told me that he cannt use option of automatic intercept. Last turn I did several air strikes, while he could not react. I want to suggest to have a break til the problem is solved. Otherwise it would not be fair. I can attack with my air force whereever I want while he has to see how his units are blown up without his fighters disturbing me. Ok for all?
hatemf90
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:48 am

RE: WWIII

Post by hatemf90 »

Hi,

Rufus thanks for your concern, Lunaticus suggested that it might be because I am mixing fighters with bombers, and that prevents it from intercepting at all, regardless of supply and distance

Last turn I managed to separate fighters, and lowered intercepting to 25% rediness, so you should see my fighters in the air... but if they dont then I should try to solve it first or i will face complete dsitruction...
It's hateM not hate, I dont hate any one.
Tufkal2
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:50 pm
Location: Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by Tufkal2 »

And the war is not coming along so bad I would say. We liberated like Helsinki, Hamburg, Berlin, Vienna, Seoul, Hiroshima, Nagasaki from capitalist oppression...
RufusTFirefly
Posts: 951
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Dortmund, Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by RufusTFirefly »

Interceptor problem is solved. NATO did two air strikes. Both times the WP interceptors attacked.
Tufkal2
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:50 pm
Location: Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by Tufkal2 »

Turn sent on to the US.
autarkis1967
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:00 am

RE: WWIII

Post by autarkis1967 »

Due to the pummeling that the US is gettting in the Asian-Pacific area and how close that the PDRC is to winning anyway the US surrenders. NATO also feels they do not have much of a chance of winning the war in Europe and also surrenders. A good game played by USSR and PDRC. In almost every theatre they dominated or where about to dominate.
Tufkal2
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:50 pm
Location: Germany

RE: WWIII

Post by Tufkal2 »

Thanks for playing. I played this scenario for the first time and very much enjoyed it. 
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents Wanted”