Steel Quality in US BB's

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Steel Quality in US BB's

Post by witpqs »

That would be 'zed' for yous guys. [:'(]
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Steel Quality in US BB's

Post by Dili »

Thanks Tiornu. This is the Diagram i have for Abruzzis: 30mm outside for decapping then space them 100mm. Probably the 30mm are the hardened the other is the Ductile. The Armour curvature baffles me but i have seen information that they tought this scheme was equal to the 150mm of Zaras.

Image




I found strange that there is not explanation for that change from Class A to B specially in a country like US.

Attachments
abruzzi1936_dis1_V.jpg
abruzzi1936_dis1_V.jpg (10.42 KiB) Viewed 62 times
Tiornu
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: Steel Quality in US BB's

Post by Tiornu »

The 30mm plate is homogenous, like Class B. In most circumstances, 100mm is the minimum thickness for naval face-hardened armor. Without any specific info, I tend to think Abruzzi's main belt was face-hardened to better damage the decapped shell.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7678
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Steel Quality in US BB's

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Since the colonials insist on misspelling aluminium, why don't they spell it uranum and plutonum?

It isn't just spelling, it's pronunciation too. American and Commonwealth English differ on the pronunciation of aluminum. However we pronounce uranium and plutonium the same, or at least have the same number of syllables in the word.

Bill
SCW Development Team
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Steel Quality in US BB's

Post by Dili »

The 30mm plate is homogenous, like Class B. In most circumstances, 100mm is the minimum thickness for naval face-hardened armor. Without any specific info, I tend to think Abruzzi's main belt was face-hardened to better damage the decapped shell.

The contrary of what i tought. Thanks.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”