Simple Survey

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: bresh

Solitaire: 0%
Hotseat : 15% (Depends bit on if each player takes 1 nation or needs to play a side).
AI : 50 %
NetPlay/PBEM : 35%
It would be best if you detailed NetPlay & PBEM, and if you did not make me guess whether it is 18% NetPlay & 17% PBEM or the reverse or something else.
User avatar
chacal83000
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:49 pm
Location: French Coast of Somalis

RE: Simple Survey

Post by chacal83000 »

Solitaire: 2 %
Head-to-head: 0%
AI: 85 %
NetPlay: 10 %
PBEM: 3 %
--
Ludwik
User avatar
Obsolete
Posts: 1388
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:52 pm

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Obsolete »

I dont understand why people would rather play an AI than a human oppoent???

No one likes to learn vs a human and get THEIR ass kicked every time.  Also, trying to either connect or maintain a stable connection is almost never as easy as the original developers had intended for it to be.

And don't forget all the solo-scenarios people love to develop in the communities.


Image
Image
King-Tigers don't let Tiger-I's get over-run.
Anonymous

[Deleted]

Post by Anonymous »

[Deleted by Admins]
Espen
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:02 am

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Espen »

At first:
AI 95%
Head to head 5%

Later:
AI 80%
Netplay 10%
PBEM 5%
Head to head 5%
"..it's only a TV-show..."
William Shatner

Finished with my paper in archaeology, trial-lecture and oral exam in 2 months time...
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Simple Survey

Post by bo »

ORIGINAL: Obsolete

I dont understand why people would rather play an AI than a human oppoent???

No one likes to learn vs a human and get THEIR ass kicked every time.  Also, trying to either connect or maintain a stable connection is almost never as easy as the original developers had intended for it to be.

And don't forget all the solo-scenarios people love to develop in the communities.



Obsolete the perfect answer to your question was given by Jadgtiger in the post above he took the words right out of my mouth [not that I would have thought of them] and I am sure many other players feel the same, I want to play when I want to play and not be obligated to make a move in a timely fashion to satisfy a pbem game player who is thirsting for my next move so he can wipe me out. I believe that the best way to play would be against a human opponent but I dont find that really feasible for me, but I am just one opinion and do not know this game at all except for the forums which have been quite informative for me. We newbies shall all find out shortly about the AI and the game mechanics.

Willy

User avatar
yoshino
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Komatsu, Japan

RE: Simple Survey

Post by yoshino »

Wmm...perhaps,

90% vs AI
10% PBEM

Later,Increase PBEM play.
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

In honor of Yoshino being the 100th respondent, here is an updated summary. Note that the bar chart show the counts, but since there are 100 respondents, it also shows the percentage.[:)]

Image
Attachments
Survey51620091.jpg
Survey51620091.jpg (130.98 KiB) Viewed 404 times
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: Simple Survey

Post by SLAAKMAN »

55% for the AI????!! What kind of newblette greenhornism is that?? The AI is rarely even a challenge in any campaign!! How disappointing. [:@]
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
User avatar
the dragon
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:36 am

RE: Simple Survey

Post by the dragon »

AI= 100%
Ta 152
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 8:47 am
Location: Durham, England

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Ta 152 »

AI 70%
Solitaire 30%
User avatar
Anendrue
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:26 pm

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Anendrue »

Solitaire - 20%
Head-to-head (Hotseat) - 0%
AI Opponent - 70%
NetPlay - 10%
PBEM - 0%
Integrity is what you do when nobody is watching.
Crusss Daddy
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:22 pm

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Crusss Daddy »

Solitaire: 25%
AI: 75%
 
YohanTM2
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 5:43 am
Location: Toronto

RE: Simple Survey

Post by YohanTM2 »

PBEM 100%
SeaMonkey
Posts: 796
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:18 am

RE: Simple Survey

Post by SeaMonkey »

Using my SC playing trend as a guide, I have to present a scenario of two different playing profiles.
 
First, the veteran or the player familiar with WiF mechanics.  In the beginning, probably a 10% investment in solitaire and/or AI play and for those that do not have the resources for human play then obviously that will be in the range of 90%, perhaps 10% for Hotseat with a friend or family member.  The 90 percentile range for PBEM and Netplay will be the norm for most vets as this game begs for human interaction.
 
Second, the novice, again in the beginning solitaire/AI play will be the greatest time garnish and as they become accustomed to the features and confident in their playing ability they will seek out the human opponents, so assuredly the reciprocal of the above percentages seem likely.
 
IMO the most important developmental playing feature for MWiF will be the multi-player per side, Netplay or PBEM, where veterans can get together with the rookies and bring them into the realm of WiF human competition as the game is highly complex.
User avatar
Windfire
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 6:24 am
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Windfire »

AI 65%
PBEM 25%
Solitare 10%
User avatar
Tonqeen
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:29 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Tonqeen »

NetPlay: 50%
PBEM: 24%
Hot Seat: 0%
AI: 25%
Solitaire: 1%
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: SeaMonkey

Using my SC playing trend as a guide, I have to present a scenario of two different playing profiles.

First, the veteran or the player familiar with WiF mechanics.  In the beginning, probably a 10% investment in solitaire and/or AI play and for those that do not have the resources for human play then obviously that will be in the range of 90%, perhaps 10% for Hotseat with a friend or family member.  The 90 percentile range for PBEM and Netplay will be the norm for most vets as this game begs for human interaction.

Second, the novice, again in the beginning solitaire/AI play will be the greatest time garnish and as they become accustomed to the features and confident in their playing ability they will seek out the human opponents, so assuredly the reciprocal of the above percentages seem likely.

IMO the most important developmental playing feature for MWiF will be the multi-player per side, Netplay or PBEM, where veterans can get together with the rookies and bring them into the realm of WiF human competition as the game is highly complex.
Curiously, The above does not provide a set of percentages for you.[;)]
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
SeaMonkey
Posts: 796
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:18 am

RE: Simple Survey

Post by SeaMonkey »

Just like everything in this current world curriculum, you have to read between the lines, the facts are in there ....somewhere?
 
Besides, stating a constant for a variable situation is at best, misleading!  Things always change...as much as they stay the same and I'm sure a player just becoming familiar with WiF will develop a playstyle accordingly, which I will be.  I'll try to play from every perspective, how about that, 5 categories divided into 100% over a time set.
 
I'll interject 20% per category!
 
And you thought this was going to be simple![:D]
 
Me too![8D]
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: Simple Survey

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: SeaMonkey

Just like everything in this current world curriculum, you have to read between the lines, the facts are in there ....somewhere?

Besides, stating a constant for a variable situation is at best, misleading!  Things always change...as much as they stay the same and I'm sure a player just becoming familiar with WiF will develop a playstyle accordingly, which I will be.  I'll try to play from every perspective, how about that, 5 categories divided into 100% over a time set.

I'll interject 20% per category!

And you thought this was going to be simple![:D]

Me too![8D]
Well, is "20% per mode of play" your answer ?
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”