The First Team: Take Two!

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Submarine Update

Post by John 3rd »

The Allies have had massive communication issues this weekend and we haven't got a turn in since Friday morning.  We shall see if one arrives tonight.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7392
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by Q-Ball »

I am glad John is keeping track of sub kills; a nice way to see what results we are getting. John's right about warships, kills as Japan are few and far between.

What is everyone else's experience? In my PBEM's as Japan, I have never sunk a warship that wasnt' already damaged or crippled bigger than a DD. UNTIL, just this month; I sank a CVE (Dec '44), with 2 torp hits. Mostly, though, any sub attack on a group of Allied warships is more dangerous to the sub than the Allies. That's my experience. Same for everyone else?

As Japan, I have lost a few bigger ships outright to subs, including a CV (Amagi), 2 CVLs, 2 CVEs, and a CL or two.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by John 3rd »

We finally get a turn in this evening and not too much happens.  I notice as Recon missions pass by that the number of Fighters over Kodiak jumps from 25 Wildcats and 27 P-40 to 81 Wildcats and 23 P-40.  I think it is safe to assume there are now at least 3 US CV present and perhaps 4.  This raises the ante quite a bit so we'll see what happens.

Unmak has 50 Zero (CAP 30%), 18 Helen, and 27 Kate ready for attack at range 5. 

Amchitka has 63 Zero and 110 Betty set for Range 11 attack.

Could be interesting...

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Rainer79
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Austria

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by Rainer79 »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

Mostly, though, any sub attack on a group of Allied warships is more dangerous to the sub than the Allies. That's my experience. Same for everyone else?

At least for me. Allied DDs seem to use ASROC from the start of the game and it only gets worse.
User avatar
frank1970
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bayern

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by frank1970 »

Hm, don´t know.
Against the AI I loose lots of DDs near Brisbane to Japanese subs.
If you like what I said love me,if you dislike what I say ignore me!

"Extra Bavaria non est vita! Et sic est vita non est ita!"

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by John 3rd »

We have internet Gremlins at work again.  I sent the turn to the Allies last night and they didn't get it so I just resent it...

Spent the last two hours on the Phone speaking to Paul for the first time.  We had a terrific chat about each other's lives.  The conversation simply reinforced my view of the comraderie and good spirit that pervades so many of the Forum's players and contributors.  Paul and I have been playing against each other for four years and this was our first actual one-on-one phone conversation.  He is a good man who has been highly supportive throughout the nightmare of the last two years.  Cannot ask for more then that!

We are waiting for the Judge's Ruling today and will make firm plans based upon that.

I think the ASW Rules are going to be different in AE and that can only help.  It is nice to see that the IJN SS Force has had some success but I am in total agreeance regarding the issues of the ASW Model.  Work can be done there still.  Looks like aerial ASW will be weakened and that should be a good thing as well.


Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by John 3rd »

One of the biggest problems playing Japan at this time in the war is knowing when to rush into a fight and knowing when to be calculated.  Brad and I WANT to rush north and fight the American Fleet but know doing so is dangerous.  This is a comment made by Brad earlier today:

They are no doubt going to be bringing in reinforcements.  Probably too late to deploy KB, though hate to keep putting off needed refits.  Most of them really need the repair at this point.  The airgroups are 100% upgraded though.  There is 1/2 of a Daitai at Osaka, you can use that, though the intention was to break it up for replacements shortly, as it's already understrength (from filling out CV units).

My immediate thinking is always ATTACK, however, this day makes me think otherwise.  If we wait just a few days our CV total goes from 6 CV to 6 CV and 3 CVL and if we wait a week after that (10 Days) our total leaps to 8 CV, 4 CVL, and 4 CVE.  Patience is the answer and each day that we wait the Sys Dam on the Fleet drops as well as the chance of upgrades initiating rises.  All this can only help. 

Until we are ready one can only watch and hope for a strong showing by our LBA.  We should have our first Sentai of Tojo deployed within 3 days and our second Sentai will be just a few days behind that.  Assault Value at Cold Bay is nearly 300 now and Forts have been rising 10% a day. 

If Paul moves quickly with his CVs and a full Inf Div then the position at Cold Bay will be quite serious. 

If he waits 2-3 days we will be stronger and able to do a bit more.

If he waits 4-6 days then our Fighters will be set to truly bloody his nose.

Robert E. Lee made a study of understanding his opponents and taking risks accordingly.  I'm reading Landscape Turned Red:  Antietam by Sears at the moment and Lee's understanding of McClellan was nothing short of amazing. 

What, thus, is my read of Paul?  I think we have 2-3 days before an American move...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7392
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by Q-Ball »

There is still alot of risk for them without KB around. I would pull all the Zeros from Cold Bay, and replace with Tojos; however, have Zeros on 100% Escort with Bettys at Umnak. Getting a good Betty strike is hit or miss, but if the strike has a strong escort, and launches 50-60% of the bombers, that could be very bad for the USN.

I think they are about to bring USN CV's within Betty range, with no way to hit the base the Bettys are on. That isn't a good idea if you are the Allies. We'll see how this developes.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: August 1, 1942 VP--Economic Report

Post by John 3rd »

That is what I plan to do.  Place Tojos at Cold Bay and maximize the Zero Escort for Bettys at Amchitka.  The planes at Umnak (AF-2/65) are Zeros with a Daitai of Kates and some Helens set to Range 5.  Amchitka's Zeros are set to Escort ONLY.  In theory this could mean about 64 Zero escorting over 100 Betty--IN THEORY.  Will be bloody and FUN to watch!

Course the Allies could LRCAP a Transport TF from the CVs but that would be highly costly to and we could kill troops in troopships...

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Motion Denied

Post by John 3rd »

We lost our Motion and are given no chance to Appeal.  The die now is cast and I only have one option left. 
 
Thanks for the support gang!
 
Will still do a few turns between now and next Monday and then I will be off the Forum for a while.
 
Thanks Again.
John
 
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
MrPlow9
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:42 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

RE: Motion Denied

Post by MrPlow9 »

Good luck my friend, we are all with you.
Image
Cuttlefish
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Motion Denied

Post by Cuttlefish »

Crud. I'm really sorry to hear that, John. Hang in there.
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Motion Denied

Post by John 3rd »

The Support has been great and you guys have kept me fairly sane throughout the last two years of life.

CF---Your work on that magnificent AAR has been a true joy to read and I know you will see it through to its logical and dramatic conclusion.  It is a work of art that I wish could be published!  Bon Chance.

I still hope to get in a turn a day until Tuesday and that will be that.  Have asked my Arch-Conspirator (and unpaid Therapist) Michael to take over at that point in time.  I HATE to leave on the Eve of battle! 


Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: Motion Denied

Post by veji1 »

Good luck John.
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
Rainer79
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Austria

RE: Motion Denied

Post by Rainer79 »

Sorry to hear that. Good luck.
Coach Z
Posts: 576
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: New York

RE: Motion Denied

Post by Coach Z »

Best of Luck, I too have enjoyed reading your posts.
ZUCK
User avatar
cantona2
Posts: 3749
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Gibraltar

RE: Motion Denied

Post by cantona2 »

Good luck John
1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born

User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Motion Denied

Post by Canoerebel »

Crud, John.  They've really backed you into a corner.  Wish you had better options available, but the "sytem" has really fixed you good.  Good luck!
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Panther Bait
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:59 pm

RE: Motion Denied

Post by Panther Bait »

Good luck John.  The forum won't be the same until you return.
 
Mike
 
When you shoot at a destroyer and miss, it's like hit'in a wildcat in the ass with a banjo.

Nathan Dogan, USS Gurnard
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Motion Denied

Post by ny59giants »

I recieved the email from Admiral Cochran-san and since I didn't have any turns in my inbox, I went to Andrew's website to download the extended map files. I use my slightly modified mod of Big B's and it RHS level 6 maps for my two PBEMs. Since I got a new computer a few weeks ago, I lost all my old stuff. I used Spooky's website to download the files, but found out it downloads at dial up speed (over 45 minutes).  I'm awaiting a reply from John and Brad, but I will try to bring honor and glory to the Emperor.
 
BANZAI!! [:D]
Admiral Benoit-san 
[center]Image[/center]
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”