Name This AE...334

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Name This AE...334

Post by Brady »

???






Image







Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Local Yokel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by Local Yokel »

B5N2 (nearest) plus B5N1 (furthest).  I suspect that rising smoke may be Palembang or somewhere nearby.  I would say these aircraft are from Ryujo's Kanko-tai, and that the date is early 1942, at which time Ryujo was operating this mix of carrier attack planes.
Image
User avatar
Howard Mitchell
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 11:41 am
Location: Blighty

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by Howard Mitchell »

A couple of B5N2 'Kates' I think, but what's on fire below I don't know.

Edit: Curses! You've got to be really fast around here before the real experts step in!
While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim
Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by Mistmatz »

To me it looks like a burning vessel, maybe a tanker. I don't see any land or city on this image.
If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by DivePac88 »

19 February at Darwin, after the KB raid, the Destroyer USS Peary burning.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by Mike Scholl »

Two very embarressed Japanese Pilots who've just realized they torpedoed their own carrier?   [:D]
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by Fallschirmjager »

Is it just me or does the more distant plane not have a rear mounted machine gun? And I notice that the rear gunner in the fore plane is not even attending his machine gun. Was it not SOP to always man the gun?
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by Brady »



B5N2 (nearest) plus B5N1 (furthest), it is[:)]

Ryujo's Kanko-tai, it is[:)]

................

Image source indicates the following:

As for the use of the two subtypes (B5N1 and B5N2), photographic documents confirm this. In the excellent book writen by Michel Ledet "Samouraï sur porte-avions", the top photo on page 145 (credit Maru) shows two Ryûjo's Kates operating in the Bangka Area, near Sumatra. The plane in the foreground is a B5N2 and the plane in the background is a B5N1

Thanks to Froggy at J-Aircraft.

Mark E. Horn from the saem source also addded this:

New information based on a detailed analysis of Ryûjo's Sentô Kodoshocho shows that the ship did carry torpedoes - using them on three missions, one in December 1941 (one torpedo equipped plane attached to a bombing force) and two in April 1942 (two torpedo equipped planes each time).

.............

The B5N1 just has not deployed its tail gun, the Guns could be stowed and the canopy closed when not in use.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: Name This AE...334

Post by ChezDaJez »

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Is it just me or does the more distant plane not have a rear mounted machine gun? And I notice that the rear gunner in the fore plane is not even attending his machine gun. Was it not SOP to always man the gun?


The rear MG can swivel down into the cockpit. The guns were only manned when action was expected.

The photo shows the Kate's triple bomb racks pretty well.

Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”