Kamikaze Defense - No Greasylake please

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3778
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

Kamikaze Defense - No Greasylake please

Post by vettim89 »

Ok my opponent is an astute player and he has scoured the forums for info on how to best employ Kamikaze's . I being an astute player have done the same so I have an idea of what he might try.

So here's the deal:

Kamikaze's have been coming usually in groups of at elast three different units/types. These groups come in at various altitudes - some very low and some very high. Obviously this affects the CAP. My CV's are keeping up but I just lost a CVE to a meager strike of 12 unescorted Sally's that were split into high/low configuration. I had 67 FM-2 on CAP and they still broke through.

My questions is this:

Will stacking my CAP help this at all or am I more likely to disperse my CAP even more

For example if I have eight CVE's, will putting two groups at 12 k, 17K , 22 K, and 27 K each help the situation?
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Kamikaze Defense - No Greasylake please

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: vettim89

Ok my opponent is an astute player and he has scoured the forums for info on how to best employ Kamikaze's . I being an astute player have done the same so I have an idea of what he might try.

So here's the deal:

Kamikaze's have been coming usually in groups of at elast three different units/types. These groups come in at various altitudes - some very low and some very high. Obviously this affects the CAP. My CV's are keeping up but I just lost a CVE to a meager strike of 12 unescorted Sally's that were split into high/low configuration. I had 67 FM-2 on CAP and they still broke through.

My questions is this:

Will stacking my CAP help this at all or am I more likely to disperse my CAP even more

For example if I have eight CVE's, will putting two groups at 12 k, 17K , 22 K, and 27 K each help the situation?


it may help but I´m not sure it would make a 67 fighter Cap bullet prove. In WITP all is about numbers. 67 FM-2s is a reasonable Cap but it is far from uber and that means that 12 Sallies can break through if they are lucky, even though I would expect them being shot down most of the time. As it´s all about numbers, get 200 fighters on Cap and nothing gets through anymore.l
FOW
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: England

RE: Kamikaze Defense - No Greasylake please

Post by FOW »

Altitude spread can help.
Numbers definately solves the problem.

FM-2s are a problem of themselves. Being only 4 gun armament they laxck the necessary firepower to consistantly bring down a medium bomber - even an IJA one! If you recheck the combat animation or combat txt does it show a lot of aircraft damaged?
4x .50cals IRL was not a problem, in this game it does seem to be. You might be better off re-equipping with F4F-4 for the CVEs
User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3778
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

RE: Kamikaze Defense - No Greasylake please

Post by vettim89 »

ORIGINAL: FOW

Altitude spread can help.
Numbers definately solves the problem.

FM-2s are a problem of themselves. Being only 4 gun armament they laxck the necessary firepower to consistantly bring down a medium bomber - even an IJA one! If you recheck the combat animation or combat txt does it show a lot of aircraft damaged?
4x .50cals IRL was not a problem, in this game it does seem to be. You might be better off re-equipping with F4F-4 for the CVEs

Thx FOW. I guess I just thought it would make semse to upgrade to the most modern type. I guess the 6x 50 cal is better in this situation
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”