Name This AE...359

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by RevRick »

ORIGINAL: Mynok

The tubes seem short in the picture for the Type 88 12.7cm/40, but maybe it is just the perspective of the shot.

Image

Methinks you are correct, little alien... it is a matter of perspective and that thing in Brady's picture sure couldn't handle a 240mm breech.

Image
Attachments
10NavalGun.jpg
10NavalGun.jpg (62.93 KiB) Viewed 135 times
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
Local Yokel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by Local Yokel »

For comparison, here is the the 120mm Type 10 DP gun to which I referred, also from the Navweaps site. So far as I can tell, there is very little difference between this mount and that for the 127mm Type 88.

Image
Attachments
Type10.jpg
Type10.jpg (119.67 KiB) Viewed 135 times
Image
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by Brady »



Ok, I can see the similar points in the referance pictures, but I have two observations, one is that in most pictures of these weapons whear their are Men present for scale, the gun and mount look smaller than the mount does in the above picture, though that could be do to the angle of the picture and that most of the men are sorta down slope from the gun, skewing the scale of it a tad.

Also the fact that afik, non of these were used by the IJA, but I think I nead to get beyond that...



Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Brady

Also the fact that afik, non of these were used by the IJA, but I think I nead to get beyond that...

i am guessing the IJA is stealing this from an IJN unit... [:'(]
User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3725
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by vettim89 »

Ok, I don't have a fnacy program to manipulate pics but this is what I can do. We can use something we can pretty well guess the dimensions of and then project it onto the item in question. Assuming the soldiers hand width is approximately 10 cm, it appears the breach is somewhere in the neighborhood of 25-30 cm in diameter. That monster 240 mm gun would have a much larger breach; so I think we can put that one to bed.

I think it is a Type 88 but could be a Type 10.

(Edit: forgot the pic the first time)

Image
Attachments
AE358mod.jpg
AE358mod.jpg (105.08 KiB) Viewed 135 times
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by Fallschirmjager »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: Brady

Also the fact that afik, non of these were used by the IJA, but I think I nead to get beyond that...

i am guessing the IJA is stealing this from an IJN unit... [:'(]

I am betting it went something close to this...
IJA unit buys IJA units several barrels of good sake and invites them to a BBQ under the guise of the inter branch friendship. IJN unit wonders why IJA unit is being so nice to them but at this point in the war good sake is hard to come by. They accept.
Next morning waking sore and with varying degrees of hangovers they stumble out of their quarters only to realize...
[X(] Where the HELL is our guns?
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Brady
Ok, I can see the similar points in the referance pictures, but I have two observations, one is that in most pictures of these weapons whear their are Men present for scale, the gun and mount look smaller than the mount does in the above picture, though that could be do to the angle of the picture and that most of the men are sorta down slope from the gun, skewing the scale of it a tad.

Also the fact that afik, non of these were used by the IJA, but I think I nead to get beyond that...
Looking at it, I think LoalYokel and the Martian both ought to get some points for this puppy. That mount is so very close to both their suggestions, and the breech clamp ring for 120mm shouldn't be all that different from a 127mm.

Maybe the IJA guys are just sloggin a IJN mount up the hill? Just 'cause you are humping it, doesn't mean you own it
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by Brady »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Brady
Ok, I can see the similar points in the referance pictures, but I have two observations, one is that in most pictures of these weapons whear their are Men present for scale, the gun and mount look smaller than the mount does in the above picture, though that could be do to the angle of the picture and that most of the men are sorta down slope from the gun, skewing the scale of it a tad.

Also the fact that afik, non of these were used by the IJA, but I think I nead to get beyond that...
Looking at it, I think LoalYokel and the Martian both ought to get some points for this puppy. That mount is so very close to both their suggestions, and the breech clamp ring for 120mm shouldn't be all that different from a 127mm.

Maybe the IJA guys are just sloggin a IJN mount up the hill? Just 'cause you are humping it, doesn't mean you own it


O they got points, hince my turn around, or move to their thinking, regarding the ID of this subject.

Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Brady
Ok, I can see the similar points in the referance pictures, but I have two observations, one is that in most pictures of these weapons whear their are Men present for scale, the gun and mount look smaller than the mount does in the above picture, though that could be do to the angle of the picture and that most of the men are sorta down slope from the gun, skewing the scale of it a tad.

Also the fact that afik, non of these were used by the IJA, but I think I nead to get beyond that...
Looking at it, I think LoalYokel and the Martian both ought to get some points for this puppy. That mount is so very close to both their suggestions, and the breech clamp ring for 120mm shouldn't be all that different from a 127mm.

Maybe the IJA guys are just sloggin a IJN mount up the hill? Just 'cause you are humping it, doesn't mean you own it

What type of uniforms did the SNLF units use? I'm just curious since the gun is mis-ID'ed could the soldiers hauling it uphill also be mis-ID'ed? And it is impossible for us to ID it on one photo, especially when the publisher of the photo mis-ID'ed it to begin with. It holds definate similarities with both the 120mm Type 10 and the 12.7cm/40 Type 88/89.

Another thing to consider, weren't defensive installations typically built by Labor Engineer units? Some of those were IJA and some IJN, but I imagine who ever was on hand got the priveledge of hauling the heavy gun uphill into the position they built.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...359

Post by Brady »


I ran this past Taki, he confirms these are in fact IJA troops and that the gun is IJN, as to when and why.....Unknown

The explenation is likely as mentioned above an IJA work party detailed to help worry it into place.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”