U.S.S. Macon

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

U.S.S. Macon

Post by Canoerebel »


I hadn't ever heard of the USS Macon until I happened across an old National Geographic article this weekend. The Macon was an airship that went down off the California coast in 1935. The most unusual thing I learned was that she carried a compliment of F9C Sparrowhawk biplanes (fighters). These were small planes (just 26 feet long with a 25-foot wingspan) that were lowered from the hanger by a "trapeze." They had a max speed of 176 mph. The planes could return to the airship - they were equipped with an iron rod that the pilot would "hook" onto the trapeze and then the plane was raised back up into the hanger.

If this airship hadn't gone down, perhaps she would have continued operating into the WWII years and we'd have something really odd to play with.


Image
Attachments
350pxUSSMaconNYC.jpg
350pxUSSMaconNYC.jpg (19.71 KiB) Viewed 503 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Kansas

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by jeffk3510 »

Interesting....
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
bradfordkay
Posts: 8686
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by bradfordkay »

Yeah... those Sparrowhawks might have been able to catch a Devastator...[:D]
 
The USN did operate several airships in ASW roles off both coasts during WW2. I'm not sure if they made it into AE...
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
bobogoboom
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by bobogoboom »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel


I hadn't ever heard of the USS Macon until I happened across an old National Geographic article this weekend. The Macon was an airship that went down off the California coast in 1935. The most unusual thing I learned was that she carried a compliment of F9C Sparrowhawk biplanes (fighters). These were small planes (just 26 feet long with a 25-foot wingspan) that were lowered from the hanger by a "trapeze." They had a max speed of 176 mph. The planes could return to the airship - they were equipped with an iron rod that the pilot would "hook" onto the trapeze and then the plane was raised back up into the hanger.

If this airship hadn't gone down, perhaps she would have continued operating into the WWII years and we'd have something really odd to play with.


Image
doubtful. she would of probobly been converted to helium and sat off the east or west coast hunting for subs like the blimps did. the american and british airship programs were complete disasters that got a lot of people killed.
I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.
Image
Sig art by rogueusmc
User avatar
bobogoboom
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by bobogoboom »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

Yeah... those Sparrowhawks might have been able to catch a Devastator...[:D]

The USN did operate several airships in ASW roles off both coasts during WW2. I'm not sure if they made it into AE...
they were blimps not airships.
I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.
Image
Sig art by rogueusmc
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by pasternakski »

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom
they were blimps not airships.
Well, that's a pretty rigid attitude to take, my lighter-than-air friend.

Yah. The story of the Akron pretty much sums up the success the U.S. had with these craft ... until professional football on T.V. came along...
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
Bearcat2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 12:53 pm

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by Bearcat2 »

They had one of the SprrowHawks at the Air Force museum in Dayton, Ohio on display the last time I was there[9 years ago]
Nevermind; it is not there now, it was on loan from the Smithsonian.
"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837
User avatar
bobogoboom
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by bobogoboom »

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom
they were blimps not airships.
Well, that's a pretty rigid attitude to take, my lighter-than-air friend.

Yah. The story of the Akron pretty much sums up the success the U.S. had with these craft ... until professional football on T.V. came along...
and those are not rigid air ships[:'(]
I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.
Image
Sig art by rogueusmc
Xxzard
Posts: 566
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by Xxzard »

The US Zeppelin program actually did OK for a while, but clearly it was quite a bit of effort for what it was worth. No airship was lost to a fire, unlike hindenburg, but they were vulnerable to storms, and so one broke in half, another crashed into the sea with considerable loss of life, and of all of them, only one survived to retirement.

It would have been possible for the USS Los Angeles to serve in WW2, but it was taken out of service in 1940, because of the akron and macon disasters, and generally it just wasn't very useful.
Image
User avatar
stevemk1a
Posts: 859
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Penticton B.C.

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by stevemk1a »

It's not a balloon it's an AIRSHIP!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQyrd1BwusQ

[:D]
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7200
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by Feinder »

Gawd, I can still rattle off  a short bio of Capt. Dale Mabry (he was killed when the Roma crashed).  He was/is the namesake of the Arnold Air Society squadron at the University of Florida (and it was part of our material when we pledged).  Dale Mabry Hwy, a major parking lot (*ahem* thoroughfare) in Tampa is also named for him: altho you can probably count the number of Tampa residents who actually know that, on one hand.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
rjopel
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:32 pm
Location: Charlottesville, VA, USA

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by rjopel »

Well I drive on Dale Mabry every day and I never knew that.
Ryan Opel
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Xxzard

The US Zeppelin program actually did OK for a while, but clearly it was quite a bit of effort for what it was worth. No airship was lost to a fire, unlike hindenburg, but they were vulnerable to storms, and so one broke in half, another crashed into the sea with considerable loss of life, and of all of them, only one survived to retirement.

It would have been possible for the USS Los Angeles to serve in WW2, but it was taken out of service in 1940, because of the akron and macon disasters, and generally it just wasn't very useful.


The Los Angeles was the only one actually built by Mr Zeppelin himself.
Tha Akron and Macon were sister ships.
Image

User avatar
bobogoboom
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by bobogoboom »

one of the more expensive and costly wastes of time the us military has be appart of.
I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.
Image
Sig art by rogueusmc
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7690
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by wdolson »

AE includes airship/blimps, at least the ZPKs.  There are three squadrons.

US airships didn't catch fire because from the mid-20s on, they all used helium.  The Germans didn't use helium because the US controlled the world supply and wouldn't sell it to anybody.  Most helium is created by radioactive decay deep in the Earth.  Alpha particles are helium nuclei (helium atom without the electrons). 

The oil wells in Texas produced a large amount of helium as a by product of oil production.  I'm not sure about modern oil production, but in the first half of the 20th century, it was the world's only source of helium with large enough quantities for industrial applications.

The lifting power of USN blimps/airships was not as good as German airships because hydrogen is much lighter than helium (a hydrogen atom is 1/4 the weight of a helium atom), but since helium is not flamable at all, it's much safer for use in lighter than air craft.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7200
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by Feinder »

altho you can probably count the number of Tampa residents who actually know that, on one hand.
-F-
Well I drive on Dale Mabry every day and I never knew that.
-rjopel

Now there's 4 of us!

[:D]

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14529
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

Yeah... those Sparrowhawks might have been able to catch a Devastator...[:D]

The USN did operate several airships in ASW roles off both coasts during WW2. I'm not sure if they made it into AE...

Yeah , and what were they flying off carriers at the same time? 1936 ? Sparrowhawks were the equivalent. Don't you guys think they would have fitted a Wildcat with a trapeeze?
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by Canoerebel »

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
Yeah... those Sparrowhawks might have been able to catch a Devastator...[:D]

The USN did operate several airships in ASW roles off both coasts during WW2. I'm not sure if they made it into AE...

Yeah , and what were they flying off carriers at the same time? 1936 ? Sparrowhawks were the equivalent. Don't you guys think they would have fitted a Wildcat with a trapeeze?


I doubt it. Hangar space and minimum speeds would have been likely problems. The Sparrowhawk had a wingspan of 25 feet; the Wildcat was 38 feet. Also, as a biplane with a max speed of 176 mph, the Sparrow could probably throttle back to a low enough speed to allow for it to hook onto the trapeze with minimal force (it's min speed wouldn't have been that much faster than the cruising speed of the airship) while the Wildcat, at a faster minimum speed, might have been too jarring for the airship's framework.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by pasternakski »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
The Sparrowhawk had a wingspan of 25 feet; the Wildcat was 38 feet.
Well, and let's not forget that the Sparrowhawk weighed about the same as a coconut, and the Wildcat was a particularly heavy beast. I's a simple matter of weight ratios.

Now, an African swallow...
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: U.S.S. Macon

Post by Canoerebel »

What's your favorite color?
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”