War in China

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

oscar72se
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

RE: War in China

Post by oscar72se »

Nicely done Iomyrin. I have enjoyed your reports a great deal, thank you. I am however a little bit curious about what would have happened if Japan decided to utilize her aircraft for strategic bombardment. The way I see it, Japan could send in 4 factors to Chengtu, unintercepted... That would mean +1 on the chart. On a 5 would it would be bye, bye oil (60% chance/risk depending on point of view).

Regards,
Oscar
User avatar
micheljq
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Quebec
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by micheljq »

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

Nicely done Iomyrin. I have enjoyed your reports a great deal, thank you. I am however a little bit curious about what would have happened if Japan decided to utilize her aircraft for strategic bombardment. The way I see it, Japan could send in 4 factors to Chengtu, unintercepted... That would mean +1 on the chart. On a 5 would it would be bye, bye oil (60% chance/risk depending on point of view).

Regards,
Oscar

Nice idea.

Japan could also rely on a strategy of heavy bombardement on China, problem it that this can consume a lot of oil, which Japan does not have in excess.
Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
oscar72se
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

RE: War in China

Post by oscar72se »

Well, much is gained for the japanese player if that oil "dissappears". It is not fun playing China without oil and getting your only HQ flipped...
[;)]

Regards,
Oscar
User avatar
sajbalk
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:39 am
Location: Davenport, Iowa

RE: War in China

Post by sajbalk »

Thanks for all your hard work. Please do another, if possible.

As to strat bombing ... a good idea. However China should put its oil in one of the far NW cities. Cheng-Tu is too close.

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 31970
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: War in China

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

Well, much is gained for the japanese player if that oil "dissappears". It is not fun playing China without oil and getting your only HQ flipped...
[;)]

Regards,
Oscar

Allies should strive to get at least one more oil into China before the Burma road is closed by Japanese control.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
peskpesk
Posts: 2638
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:44 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

RE: War in China

Post by peskpesk »

ORIGINAL: Froonp
ORIGINAL: lomyrin
This then will conclude this example of the war in China.
Will there be another ?

Yes please! [&o] And maybe this times the soviets could rattle the sabres loudly at the Manchuria border and threaten to attack! And please keep at exact build/losses record count.
"'Malta - The Thorn in Rommel's Side"
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: War in China

Post by brian brian »

mucho thanks lomyrin!
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8508
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: War in China

Post by paulderynck »

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

Well, much is gained for the japanese player if that oil "dissappears". It is not fun playing China without oil and getting your only HQ flipped...
[;)]

Regards,
Oscar
This is why you usually find the Oil located in Kashgar.
Paul
User avatar
BallyJ
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:04 pm

RE: War in China

Post by BallyJ »

Thanks for this. I have enjoyed your reports. Come on release date!!! The new China looks great.
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 3107
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: War in China

Post by Joseignacio »

Thanks, I was also following and enjoying it.
oscar72se
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

RE: War in China

Post by oscar72se »

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

Well, much is gained for the japanese player if that oil "dissappears". It is not fun playing China without oil and getting your only HQ flipped...
[;)]

Regards,
Oscar
This is why you usually find the Oil located in Kashgar.
True, but you can't protect yourself from everything. IIRC there are japanese planes with 22 range and a strat-factor. [:)]
User avatar
Neilster
Posts: 3002
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 1:52 pm
Location: Devonport, Tasmania, Australia

RE: War in China

Post by Neilster »

Any chance of a Guadacanal scenario? It would give people a feel for naval combat in MWiF. For those that don't know, this can be quite unpredictable.

Cheers, Neilster
Cheers, Neilster
User avatar
micheljq
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Quebec
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by micheljq »

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

Well, much is gained for the japanese player if that oil "dissappears". It is not fun playing China without oil and getting your only HQ flipped...
[;)]

Regards,
Oscar

I speak about a long and heavy strategic bombardment of China, lower it's production and even destroy some blue factories. The chinese oil coup is easy to counter, just put the chinese oil far far away in the east, like in Urumchi. To reorganise, you just need a basic supply path of any lenght. [:)]
Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
User avatar
micheljq
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Quebec
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by micheljq »

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

True, but you can't protect yourself from everything. IIRC there are japanese planes with 22 range and a strat-factor. [:)]

I don't think Japan has this sort of plane early on. But again, China begins with a FTR in the setup, just put the FTR in the same city as oil, far away in the west, instead of having that FTR destroyed by the usually better japanese fighters.
Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
Mike Parker
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:43 am
Location: Houston TX

RE: War in China

Post by Mike Parker »

ORIGINAL: micheljq

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

True, but you can't protect yourself from everything. IIRC there are japanese planes with 22 range and a strat-factor. [:)]

I don't think Japan has this sort of plane early on. But again, China begins with a FTR in the setup, just put the FTR in the same city as oil, far away in the west, instead of having that FTR destroyed by the usually better japanese fighters.

They start 1939 with a 19 Range plane with a strat factors the H6K Mavis. A pretty valuable aircraft for them since its an ATR. In 41 they get a 22 Range G4M1 Betty, but that is a little late in the war.

I agree with putting the fighter with the oil, its not like you get much use of it elsewhere, the Japanese can usually manage to have a 4 factor Ftr (or CVP even) against your 3.
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: Mike Parker
They start 1939 with a 19 Range plane with a strat factors the H6K Mavis. A pretty valuable aircraft for them since its an ATR. In 41 they get a 22 Range G4M1 Betty, but that is a little late in the war.

I agree with putting the fighter with the oil, its not like you get much use of it elsewhere, the Japanese can usually manage to have a 4 factor Ftr (or CVP even) against your 3.
Japan does not start the Global War 1939-1945 scenario with the 19 ranged Mavis.
They have 3 FTR2 from which 2 must be put on the map.
They have 3 LND2 from which 2 must be put on the map.
They have 2 NAV2 from which 1 must be put on the map.
They have 1 NAV3 from which 1 must be put on the map.

The H6K Mavis is an ATR4 that enters the force pool in 1939, but it is not in game at start. It must be built for 4 of the 10 or so initial Japanese BP,and will at best be in game in M/J 40 after 4 turns of building.
Mike Parker
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:43 am
Location: Houston TX

RE: War in China

Post by Mike Parker »

ORIGINAL: Froonp
ORIGINAL: Mike Parker
They start 1939 with a 19 Range plane with a strat factors the H6K Mavis. A pretty valuable aircraft for them since its an ATR. In 41 they get a 22 Range G4M1 Betty, but that is a little late in the war.

I agree with putting the fighter with the oil, its not like you get much use of it elsewhere, the Japanese can usually manage to have a 4 factor Ftr (or CVP even) against your 3.
Japan does not start the Global War 1939-1945 scenario with the 19 ranged Mavis.
They have 3 FTR2 from which 2 must be put on the map.
They have 3 LND2 from which 2 must be put on the map.
They have 2 NAV2 from which 1 must be put on the map.
They have 1 NAV3 from which 1 must be put on the map.

The H6K Mavis is an ATR4 that enters the force pool in 1939, but it is not in game at start. It must be built for 4 of the 10 or so initial Japanese BP,and will at best be in game in M/J 40 after 4 turns of building.
I should have said "They start the 1939 scenario with only one long range bomber in their force pool the H6K Mavis which is an ATR.

I meant it was available in '39, it could be built (and often will be for its ATR as well as bombing) and it would then be capable of potentially being used against the chinese stored oil as was suggested.

I was trying to refute the idea that a 22 range bomber was available to get to the oil early, and well the only possibility is the Mavis early on, the Japanese don' get a 22 range bomber till '41, then they have to build it, then deploy it in china, then pretty quickly they will need to be attacking the CW so its pretty unlikely the G4M1 Betty will really get a shot at any stored oil.


User avatar
morgil
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 5:04 am
Location: Bergen, Norway

RE: War in China

Post by morgil »

I dont recall the cost of these planes, but i belive JPN start out with a 14 range Nell, 1 or 2 strat.
If you dont need this plane for partisan checkerage and can afford the oil, it can be quite helpfull to strat the chinese.
If you get the 2strat one, its 40% chance of a BP every turn, assuming you dont get intercepted, and that is about a MIL/GAR and an INF removed from the last picture in the scenario above...
Gott weiss ich will kein Engel sein.
Mike Parker
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:43 am
Location: Houston TX

RE: War in China

Post by Mike Parker »

Morgil,
 
You are right the JPN do have a 14 range NAV with 1 or 2 (depending on draw) Strat factors.  Not sure if it has the legs to reach out to get the on-map oil the chinese keep socked away though.
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8508
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: War in China

Post by paulderynck »

ORIGINAL: Mike Parker

ORIGINAL: Froonp
ORIGINAL: Mike Parker
They start 1939 with a 19 Range plane with a strat factors the H6K Mavis. A pretty valuable aircraft for them since its an ATR. In 41 they get a 22 Range G4M1 Betty, but that is a little late in the war.

I agree with putting the fighter with the oil, its not like you get much use of it elsewhere, the Japanese can usually manage to have a 4 factor Ftr (or CVP even) against your 3.
Japan does not start the Global War 1939-1945 scenario with the 19 ranged Mavis.
They have 3 FTR2 from which 2 must be put on the map.
They have 3 LND2 from which 2 must be put on the map.
They have 2 NAV2 from which 1 must be put on the map.
They have 1 NAV3 from which 1 must be put on the map.

The H6K Mavis is an ATR4 that enters the force pool in 1939, but it is not in game at start. It must be built for 4 of the 10 or so initial Japanese BP,and will at best be in game in M/J 40 after 4 turns of building.
I should have said "They start the 1939 scenario with only one long range bomber in their force pool the H6K Mavis which is an ATR.

I meant it was available in '39, it could be built (and often will be for its ATR as well as bombing) and it would then be capable of potentially being used against the chinese stored oil as was suggested.

I was trying to refute the idea that a 22 range bomber was available to get to the oil early, and well the only possibility is the Mavis early on, the Japanese don' get a 22 range bomber till '41, then they have to build it, then deploy it in china, then pretty quickly they will need to be attacking the CW so its pretty unlikely the G4M1 Betty will really get a shot at any stored oil.


In the boardgame the Mavis would still have to be based in the desert 2 hexes N.E. of Lan Chow to be in range of Kashgar. Having a plane based there in supply is not a simple matter for the Japanese.
Paul
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”