AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues [OUTDATED]

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by thegreatwent »

Odd my P-36 at PH is a Float Fighter. I am not an expert but is that right?[&:]

Sorry it is a fighter Float equipped. Never knew they did that[X(]
User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by TheElf »

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

Odd my P-36 at PH is a Float Fighter. I am not an expert but is that right?[&:]

Sorry it is a fighter Float equipped. Never knew they did that[X(]
Probably a typo. We'll note it and have it set for the first patch. Alternatively, in the near term, players can change the setting with the editor.
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5364
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA
Contact:

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Tanaka »

I dont see any of the original Tainan group pilots in this scenario (Guadalcanal) or the others? Is there longer no historical pilots? [:(]

Image
Attachments
Clipboard01.jpg
Clipboard01.jpg (74.85 KiB) Viewed 487 times
Image

Check out my mod for Strategic Command American Civil War!

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopic.php?t=413785
User avatar
88l71
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:01 am

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by 88l71 »

Didn't the B-29 have 2x .50 cal and 1x 20mm in the tail gun position? None of the B-29's have a 20mm listed. Or am I wrong about that?

User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Some marks did, and do in the game. I forget if there's three or four subspecies of Superforts.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
88l71
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:01 am

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by 88l71 »

Ahh, okay, the B-29-1 has the 20mm/50cal combo, the other 2 versions have triple .50's in the tail. Must have missed one.
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by timtom »

ORIGINAL: TheElf

ORIGINAL: thegreatwent

Odd my P-36 at PH is a Float Fighter. I am not an expert but is that right?[&:]

Sorry it is a fighter Float equipped. Never knew they did that[X(]
Probably a typo. We'll note it and have it set for the first patch. Alternatively, in the near term, players can change the setting with the editor.

Aaaaargh. Expletive expletive catherding.
Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16598
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

I dont see any of the original Tainan group pilots in this scenario (Guadalcanal) or the others? Is there longer no historical pilots? [:(]

Image

I happened to see in the reserve pilot list (I think that was what it's called) S. Sakai (Saburo possibly)? He had the highest experience rating. But it showed him in Tainan daitai. Not sure why that is though. I don't really understand that part of it yet.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread

Post by pad152 »

Air Group (2221) VRF-3B  located on the Copahee (3056) has "0" aircraft!
User avatar
DBS
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:59 am

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by DBS »

Question - in the Editor, why are some fixed forward-firing weapons listed as Front, while others are listed as Centre-Line? Does it make any difference?

Very very very minor point - the Walrus II should have a Vickers K in the nose, not a Vickers V! The Swordfish Is used by No.4 AACU probably did not have any meaningful torpedo attack capability, since they were intended for utility duties, particularly as target tugs. The pilots will certainly have had no torpedo training. Suggest should be rerated as a light bomber with payload of 2x250lb.

Oh, and Stranraer misspelt for the RCAF.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12465
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

I dont see any of the original Tainan group pilots in this scenario (Guadalcanal) or the others? Is there longer no historical pilots? [:(]

Image

I happened to see in the reserve pilot list (I think that was what it's called) S. Sakai (Saburo possibly)? He had the highest experience rating. But it showed him in Tainan daitai. Not sure why that is though. I don't really understand that part of it yet.

There is a cross-link issue when groups are initially assigned pilots. They sometimes get 'borrowed' by another group.

The pilots aren't lost. They either end up in the wrong group or in the pilot reserve.
This is down to be corrected in the first patch.
Michael
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16598
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: michaelm
There is a cross-link issue when groups are initially assigned pilots. They sometimes get 'borrowed' by another group.

The pilots aren't lost. They either end up in the wrong group or in the pilot reserve.
This is down to be corrected in the first patch.

Hmm, does this mean there are incorrect numbers of pilots in some of the units, since they may be "borrowed" by another unit?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by timtom »

Boys, here's your chance to say thanks to long-suffering Michael McFarland, who's made all of AE's aviation-related goodness possible (all the F'-up's are pointy-ears fault [;)]).

Thanks Mike, for suffering me these past 30 months with such patience and good humour!

Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16598
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Mike Solli »

Question about the reserve aircraft in air units:  Is it worth keeping them in the air units (subject to destruction on the ground) since most of them have no pilots?  Also, is there a limit to the number of reserve aircraft there can be in an air unit?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16598
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: timtom

Boys, here's your chance to say thanks to long-suffering Michael McFarland, who's made all of AE's aviation-related goodness possible (all the F'-up's are pointy-ears fault [;)]).

Thanks Mike, for suffering me these past 30 months with such patience and good humour!


Thanks Michael!
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: DBS

Question - in the Editor, why are some fixed forward-firing weapons listed as Front, while others are listed as Centre-Line? Does it make any difference?

Centerline guns generally have better accuracy as wing guns rely on deflection shooting..
Image

User avatar
DBS
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:59 am

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by DBS »

Thanks!
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by DuckofTindalos »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Question about the reserve aircraft in air units:  Is it worth keeping them in the air units (subject to destruction on the ground) since most of them have no pilots?  Also, is there a limit to the number of reserve aircraft there can be in an air unit?

It's a very, very good idea to keep them in their units, because any attrition replacements are drawn from the reserves first, rather than the pool.

And no idea, that's for the flyboys to know.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16598
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Mike Solli »

Thanks, T.  I had forgotten about the "enhanced" attrition. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Advice on altitudes for CV strike groups

Post by Dili »

Centerline guns generally have better accuracy as wing guns rely on deflection shooting..

also less rate of fire.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”